I'm back to L-1.
Point 1
: Charter's reaction to my wagon
charter wrote:
I think Brandi is pretty likely to be scum. After Dramonic starts to seriously garner suspicion, she asks for a votecount, and hasn't said anything about Dramonic. I think this is probably pretty lazy scumbuddy action trying to see whether she needs to bus or can try and pull suspicion off Dramonic. Plus she's given zero insight into the game.
I still think FakeGod is likely to be scum. He voted Dramonic, his voting with regard to Dramonic is pretty weird, he voted him twice, neither time with much reason, and when he voted him the second time, Dramonic was miles away from a lynch, and I don't think FakeGod posted again before he got lynched.
Pom I'm kind of neutral on. Her Dramonic vote gives her about the same number of town points as the number of scum points she's racked up throughout the game.
BV, scummy as hell as well. Has done nothing but vote Kitoari a few times.
Scumspicions (In order)
BV/Brandi
FakeGod
Pom
Charter's thoughts when he was pushed to "L-1"
charter wrote:For thinking I am scum, FakeGod sure is concerned in 364 that the mafia are (were) going to quickhammer me. It's almost like he's knows I'm town (since I doubt mafia would quickhammer themselves right now).
Lol, FakeGod wanting three people to claim. Obvscum.
Pie wrote:There's usually reasons why people don't claim, FG, and I haven't seen many instances where scum hasn't claimed at L-2/L-1.
I would never claim in a game in a scenario like this, where most of the people voting me haven't given a good reason. First you defend yourself, and if no one is buying your defense, and people threaten to hammer, then you might (depending on role) claim.
FakeGod's softclaim in his last post there is pretty suspect as well. "Oh, this dead person can confirm me, but Athey're dead so you'll just have to take my word for it!", yeah right.
I'm willing to hammer FakeGod. I've given many reasons I'm suspicious of him (and some more in this post) and he hasn't given any satisfactory explanation.
His post after my wagon formed.
Not to mention that he jumps on my wagon like his life depended on it, but also his tone/style is incredibly different.
This is a character break, people. Don't forget it.
Point 2
: Pom's voting reasons
Pom votes me (5th vote on the wagon) and gives the following as her reasons:
Pomegranate wrote:I mean, charter is scummy, but WTH FakeGod, three claims?
Why
? No.
VOTE: FakeGod
Extremely shallow reasoning, because her vote is based on one post I have made in the entire game. It seems like she is rather bandwagonning on a easy prey, a point only confirmed later by her unvoting and revoting later (which she tries to show her "indecisiveness"), to distance herself away from the mislynch which now seems unavoidable.
Point 3
: Brandi + Pie's reaction to my meta
Brandi posts this along the way.
Brandi wrote:Based purely on meta, I would say I still don't believe FG is scum. He was incredibly scummy and portraying all sorts of obvscumtells in Furry, that it's hard to think he's much different here than there. I can provide links for anyone interested. LYLO was where he was most notably scummy. I wont support this lynch though, unless someone can show me a game they played with FG where he was scum and acted this way as well.
I really appreciate the meta defense, but unfortunately a counter-example (something that would complete this defense) doesn't exist.
There was no game where I was scum.
What's interesting about this post is Pie's reaction, or rather non-reaction, to it.
Pie says soon afterwards:
[quote="InflatablePie" Whereas FG is just being scummy as all get-out and needs to die.[/quote]
Pie makes absolutely no remarks toward the meta defense. Pie, as one of the few players who personally knows what Brandi's meta defense is talking about, completely ignores this and do not even respond to it, even when Brandi remarks on it again in her later post.
My play here actually parallels that other game quite well. For example, my posting the Plan-Of-Action here drew just as bad opinions as my Life Gamble in the other game. The speedwagon on me on day 2 is almost identical in both days. While I could go on about how the games are similar, the point is that Pie ignored them all completely. I'm pretty sure even though he has noticed the similarities in my play styles and what's happening between the both games, but chose deliberately to not bring them up or to respond to them when Brandi brought them up.
Point 4
: Unnatural speed of my wagon
Yes. I went from 0 votes to L-1 within matter of hours. Only a naive fool would say that scum had done nothing to help it out. Quicklynches are almost always bad for the town, and here is no exception. It seems extremely convenient when some of the players switched out and bandwagoned onto my wagon, as soon as I provided them an easy excuse to do so with. (my plan + my full claim)
Judging by the unnatural speed and how most of the votes are based on extremely specific things I have said, there's no doubt that there is at least one scum on my wagon
right now
, and you guys need to slow down before it's too late.
Also, lastly, consider yourselves in my position. You have no powers, and your sibling died on day 1 without you or your sibling making significant amount of breadcrumbing. To add to this, sibling flips as a VT, which would absolutely trash your claim's cred later on. Yeah. It looks pretty bleak, doesn't it?
Do you guys really believe that I am scum, and that I would have claimed Joey and put myself in this position?
