Supernatural mafia - Mafia team wins!!!!!

[ReaperCharlie]

Why are you so against tubby's "obstinacy" and lack of contribution when there are so many other guilty parties? Trying to flail at anything to keep people looking not at you methinks.

i am against tubby's obstinacy because it's anti-town. for the EXACT SAME REASON you were against GH's obstinacy on day 1. lmao. your hypocrisy is showing.

and magna, in case you still didn't see it, which i find miraculous given your high intelligence level, benmage's double standard consisted of 1. attacking GH for withholding information from the town, but 2. not attacking tubby for refusing to scumhunt. the only reason i can see is that tubby said he'd sheep benmage off a cliff, benmage put it in his sig, and after that they were fast friends. but he kept on GH even after 3/4 of the thread had told him to drop it, and that is a double standard. and that is scummy.

also: while you telling me i did a bad job at tracker is ultimately helpful and all in the long run for my career, it obv won't help in this game if you lynch me. and i have never played tracker before and yes i WAS approaching it as if playing a cop. so there. lol

anyways, i see no point to posting any further. if you're gonna lynch me you're gonna lynch me. if you guys decide to lynch somebody else, have the mod throw me a pm to check back in and begin scum hunting again, because i have said about all there is to say, and i can't defend myself any more than i have already.

oh and if people can be revived once they're 'waiting in the wings'... then somebody please revive me. haha

[Benmage]

Stop saying false statements RC, you're making yourself look bad.

Tubby isn't withholding information. He isn't playing a style you wish he was. These are drastic differences.

And again, why are you only focusing on tubby's lack of content, and not others. Thats the only hypocrisy I am seeing.

[ReaperCharlie]

chainsaw defending tubby to the end, i see. he sucks your dick, you suck his.

ok. that's valid.

[Benmage]

chainsaw defending tubby to the end, i see. he sucks your dick, you suck his.

ok. that's valid.

Deflect, again. God you made this easy.

[MagnaofIllusion]

and magna, in case you still didn't see it, which i find miraculous given your high intelligence level, benmage's double standard consisted of 1. attacking GH for withholding information from the town, but 2. not attacking tubby for refusing to scumhunt. the only reason i can see is that tubby said he'd sheep benmage off a cliff, benmage put it in his sig, and after that they were fast friends. but he kept on GH even after 3/4 of the thread had told him to drop it, and that is a double standard. and that is scummy.

What you are presenting isn’t a double standard. A double standard would be treating the actions of two players that are similar in different fashions. Benmage didn’t attack GH for not scum-hunting (which would be an accurate attack, IMO, as GH hasn’t done any significant hunting at all) while ignoring Tubby’s.

You want to make an argument that benmage is scummy for letting low to no content posters off the hook while targeting others for things not as important as lack of scum-hunting? Great. But don’t claim a fictional double-standard as scummy behaviour when it does not exist.

anyways, i see no point to posting any further. if you're gonna lynch me you're gonna lynch me. if you guys decide to lynch somebody else, have the mod throw me a pm to check back in and begin scum hunting again, because i have said about all there is to say, and i can't defend myself any more than i have already.

Throwing in the towel? I expected better of you, regardless of your alignment.

oh and if people can be revived once they're 'waiting in the wings'... then somebody please revive me. Haha

Actually if this is a valid option please bring back Starbuck.

[ReaperCharlie]

Throwing in the towel? I expected better of you, regardless of your alignment.

Sorry. too many games going on, and my wife is about to go into labor so I guess it is for the best actually, lol

[Benmage]

Throwing in the towel? I expected better of you, regardless of your alignment.

Sorry. too many games going on, and my wife is about to go into labor so I guess it is for the best actually, lol

WELL.... Congratulations!!!

[ReaperCharlie]

Thanks

[Midnight's Sorrow]

Sorry Magna.

But I still think your full of shit. In my PoV I find RC's claim more believable, then I believe anything coming from you.

Hunt: MangaofIllusion

[animorpherv1]

Well, if RC wants to be lynched, I'll hammer. Just to ake sure no obv pro-town players go down because RC is a scum bomb or something.

[TheLonging]

and magna, in case you still didn't see it, which i find miraculous given your high intelligence level, benmage's double standard consisted of 1. attacking GH for withholding information from the town, but 2. not attacking tubby for refusing to scumhunt. the only reason i can see is that tubby said he'd sheep benmage off a cliff, benmage put it in his sig, and after that they were fast friends. but he kept on GH even after 3/4 of the thread had told him to drop it, and that is a double standard. and that is scummy.

What you are presenting isn’t a double standard. A double standard would be treating the actions of two players that are similar in different fashions. Benmage didn’t attack GH for not scum-hunting (which would be an accurate attack, IMO, as GH hasn’t done any significant hunting at all) while ignoring Tubby’s.

You want to make an argument that benmage is scummy for letting low to no content posters off the hook while targeting others for things not as important as lack of scum-hunting? Great. But don’t claim a fictional double-standard as scummy behaviour when it does not exist

oh and if people can be revived once they're 'waiting in the wings'... then somebody please revive me. Haha

Actually if this is a valid option please bring back Starbuck.

First one: I'm fairly sure he might mean something else; attacking GH for not providing information/doing anything (not saying the 2 accounts) while buddying with tubby, despite tubby not providing any information/doing anything. If it's not that then I can't see the double standard point.

And I'd like whoever could to bring back Starbuck as well, and someone else (forgot who).

[TheLonging]

Well, if RC wants to be lynched, I'll hammer. Just to ake sure no obv pro-town players go down because RC is a scum bomb or something.

Woah you came out of nowhere.

[animorpherv1]

Well, if RC wants to be lynched, I'll hammer. Just to ake sure no obv pro-town players go down because RC is a scum bomb or something.

Woah you came out of nowhere.

No kidding.

[willows_weep]

chainsaw defending tubby to the end, i see. he sucks your dick, you suck his.

ok. that's valid.

Uhm, why in the world would this kind of post be okay?????

[Benmage]

Sorry Magna.

But I still think your full of shit. In my PoV I find RC's claim more believable, then I believe anything coming from you.

Hunt: MangaofIllusion

Can you state specifically what you don't believe Magna to be saying is true, rather than just generalizing it with "anything".

[Midnight's Sorrow]

Unless Magan is a watcher, for him to state that he tracked RC to Mole....he would have had to have been tracking Mole too! Thats why I'm calling bullshit.

[animorpherv1]

@MS:

No. Trackers track a target to whoever they visited.

vote: Midnight's Sorrow

that thar was BS.

[animorpherv1]

EBWOP:

hunt: Midnight's Sorrow

[Midnight's Sorrow]

Either way Magna is lying. Because he shouldn't have been able to do anything.

[animorpherv1]

unless MoI claimed not tracker or watcher, I don't see why not.

[Midnight's Sorrow]

He was Roleblocked.

Him correctly guessing that RC visted Mole reeks of Informed minority.

[animorpherv1]

He claimed to be roleblocked? I need to read closer.

[Midnight's Sorrow]

No...I ROLEBLOCKED HIM!!

[animorpherv1]

[Sawyer]

Umm I know it was probably just a rambling list but how in the heck could Reaper have claimed Doc / similar style role if Mole is dead.

It was just a rambling list, but since you asked, I think there are a few roles that could negate the effect of a doc, like a JK.

Is it your opinion that players should be required to unvote simply based on a claim? Tracker is essentially unproveable and unchallengable when said Target is dead. We already have a proven Dayvig. Given three people died last night it is also likely that we have some other Town vig style role. How many Vigs / Limited Vigs do you think are reasonable for a game this size?

This is exactly why why Reapers claim should be more likely true than not. Fakeclaiming Tracker would not automatically clear him of suspicion when he targeting someone that's dead, especially when you claim to be a tracker as well. So if he was scum, I'd say he would be much more likely to claim Vig, since that would explain why he targeted someone that's dead without being scum.

No...I ROLEBLOCKED HIM!!

Whoa, this game has so many twists and turns. So you roleblocked Magna? Why him?