Mini 1011: Help! My Computer Got Infected! (Game over!)

[UncertainKitten]

EBWOP: Yes, I know xvart wasn't asking me but as one of the people on the wagon I figure it wise to justify my vote against comparative situations.

[screl1]

@PieMan - again, isn't it beneficial to start the game asap? Besides pressing people what other way can one start the game? You said that 1 from each group is mafia. Please tell us who is in which group so there is no confusion later in the game.

@Vez – post 49 – what on earth are you talking about with azure.exe and night.exe?
Also why do you keep claiming power roles so early? How does this help town?

@JJ – why do you have a problem with xvart pressing PieMan?

@UK - Sorry but to me if you are online you are a male. I will try and remember this in the future but no guarantees, sorry.

[UncertainKitten]

@screl: That's a rather outmoded and misogynist viewpoint. Think girls are too stupid to use the internet or something?

I'd prefer you check your fucking privilege, thank you very much.

Huh, I don't seem to have much game related to say after that. A shame.

[screl1]

@screl: That's a rather outmoded and misogynist viewpoint. Think girls are too stupid to use the internet or something?

I'd prefer you check your fucking privilege, thank you very much.

Huh, I don't seem to have much game related to say after that. A shame.

I never said that girls are to stupid. From my experience more people who use forums are overwhelmingly male so I just refer to everyone as such.

[UncertainKitten]

Hmmph. Still rather presumptuous. But I did jump to conclusions based on some very stupid people I've seen on the internet.

So, I'll apologize for my own presumption since it wasn't fair to you.

[StrangerCoug]

VOTE COUNT

gandalf5166 (5):, jelly jiggler, FakeGod, UncertainKitten, PieMan, Me=Weird
jelly jiggler (3): bv310, screl1, vezokpiraka
PieMan (2): Nobody Special, xvart
Not voting (2): gandalf5166, Ademisk

With

12

players alive, it takes

7

players to lynch.

I think the mod has me and gandalf mixed up. I was the first to vote gandalf and he never voted.

Fixed. Make sure you bold important information like this.

[StrangerCoug]

Ademisk has requested replacement, which will be by Twomz.

[xvart]

EBWOP: Yes, I know xvart wasn't asking me but as one of the people on the wagon I figure it wise to justify my vote against comparative situations.

Yes, I'm less concerned with the first couple of votes, but the others that piled on afterwards are extremely opportunistic; especially Me=Weird's with the context he provided.

I think the mod has me and gandalf mixed up. I was the first to vote gandalf and he never voted.

Fixed. Make sure you bold important information like this.

Okay, now that that is cleared up; the reason I was asking was because, based on flavor, maybe someone had control over gandalf's vote or had forced/hacked his vote, or he had to do something to "free" his vote; all of which would appear to me to be a scum action against gandalf.

xvart.

[PieMan]

@screl1 Diztanzing mai b teh main reazon 4 the xvart thing. Juzt a idea. He jumped hrd, hrdr than 1 shuld wif liek no evidense. 4s 4 woo iz maf, them being maf iz juzt speculation.

@xvart U only vote 4 who U C. I 4got they were hear. Ghot 2 keap a better I. Gand haz posted much, in other placez, while the other 2 R MIA. Zo Gand iz activ lurkz, and teh otherz r MIA.

[PieMan]

@xvart Y did U whant 2 Kno teh bad stuff frum me posting rong?

p 152

[xvart]

2 Itz hrd. 1f Gandalf, waz Aktiv from start, It wuld be on xvart, It iz a low end caze, but having the vote out ther, givs moar dizcussion.

So if gandalf was active from the start you would be voting me? But not Ademisk, who has also not been active, and who you already acknowledged existed by trying to vote earlier?

@xvart U only vote 4 who U C. I 4got they were hear. Ghot 2 keap a better I. Gand haz posted much, in other placez, while the other 2 R MIA. Zo Gand iz activ lurkz, and teh otherz r MIA.

In fact, how can you justify this post by saying gandalf has posted much, when at the time of your vote he had only posted once (the equivalent of Ademisk)? Sounds to me like you are trying to justify for your original vote on gandalf after the fact.

@xvart Y did U whant 2 Kno teh bad stuff frum me posting rong?

p 152

Like I said (in the post you mention at the bottom of your post), I'll explain once you tell me what the ramification of violating your post restriction is. How did the moderator respond to your inquiry about the lack of information in your role pm? Again, I see no gain for scum to know this information and if I did I would never have asked it in the first place.

xvart.

[Nobody Special]

More PieMan votes, please. Or my head will, quite literally, explode.

EBWOP: Yes, I know xvart wasn't asking me but as one of the people on the wagon I figure it wise to justify my vote against comparative situations.

I missed this. Please explain your compulsive need to explain your actions.

[UncertainKitten]

Because if I hadn't, then we'd be in a situation where I have unexplained behavior, and being transparent is pro town, IMO. Hence why I've been asking people all game to justify their scum reads. I can't ask for that and then just be like, "Oh, hey, I'm going to vote this guy but completely ignore the other person doing the same thing"

[Nobody Special]

But you answered a question that was asked of someone else, so that negates ANY GOOD THING YOU MAY HAVE TRIED TO DO.

[UncertainKitten]

That was a lapse of reason. I cede I should have waited.

[vezokpiraka]

Stop voting gandalf. He is not scum.
More jelly votes.
@screl : I am not answering your questions. No fishes in this hole.

[UncertainKitten]

What proof have you of that, vezok? I merely would like him to contribute.

[vezokpiraka]

I have no proof. Just meta form ongoing games.
If you want to convince yourself though lynch gandalf.
Jelly is scum so we need more votes on him.

[UncertainKitten]

As I said, if he produces adequately, I'll move on. I already know where I'm likely headed actually.

[Nobody Special]

I look greatly askance at two playerslots with such recent joindates discussing meta.

[Nobody Special]

To clarify: I'm referring to vezo & gandalf.

[screl1]

@Vez - Why do you refuse to answer questions? Is there some reason why they are not valid?

[PieMan]

2 Itz hrd. 1f Gandalf, waz Aktiv from start, It wuld be on xvart, It iz a low end caze, but having the vote out ther, givs moar dizcussion.

So if gandalf was active from the start you would be voting me? But not Ademisk, who has also not been active, and who you already acknowledged existed by trying to vote earlier?

@xvart U only vote 4 who U C. I 4got they were hear. Ghot 2 keap a better I. Gand haz posted much, in other placez, while the other 2 R MIA. Zo Gand iz activ lurkz, and teh otherz r MIA.

In fact, how can you justify this post by saying gandalf has posted much, when at the time of your vote he had only posted once (the equivalent of Ademisk)? Sounds to me like you are trying to justify for your original vote on gandalf after the fact.

@xvart Y did U whant 2 Kno teh bad stuff frum me posting rong?

p 152

Like I said (in the post you mention at the bottom of your post), I'll explain once you tell me what the ramification of violating your post restriction is. How did the moderator respond to your inquiry about the lack of information in your role pm? Again, I see no gain for scum to know this information and if I did I would never have asked it in the first place.

xvart.

Ademisk iz AFK, Knot cuming bak, just gone.

Gandalf haz posted much, in other placez Nub. He iz active lurkzorz.

He siad prolly a warning, I azzume 2 an' I die.

Bai nao, I prolly would hav removed mai voet, from xvart, but I hav ben triing to use it moar to encourage people to tlk, so I kant sai were it wuld b, I almost wunder vezo, and Jelly, but taht culd b zo rong. Diztanzing Principal

[jelly jiggler]

@JJ – why do you have a problem with xvart pressing PieMan?

I don't have a problem with this at all.

[StrangerCoug]

Bumping the count to the next page.