drmyshottyizsik - 1 - Zajnet
ekiM - 1 - yabbaguy
kyle99 - 1 - ekiM
yabbaguy - 1 - Beefster
Ythan - 1 - Alduskkel
Not voting: drmyshottyizsik, Dry-fit, kyle99, Netlava, The Fonz, Ythan
With 11 alive, it is 6 to lynch. Deadline: August 16
I won'tekiM wrote:@mod--- normal wording would be "half rounded down plus one", I guess...
@yabba - From experience, games where people vote early and start bandwagons get going quicker. It rarely hurts.
What's a semi-random vote? You've got a semi-reason you don't want to share, yet you chastised Alduskkel for the same thing. Huh?
Well with your sole contribution to the game having been one word I was trying to get more content out of you.Ythan wrote:I'm looking over a lot of setup information before I look at the smaller pool of probably meaningless RVS information. Are you questioning why I'm not contributing to the noise?
I eenie meenie miney moed.Ythan wrote:Al, provide a reason for your vote on me.
What if someone says they would shoot N0? That lowers the probability that they're a Vig and makes the Mafia's job of finding power roles easier.Ythan wrote:Before anyone answers, does anyone disagree with asking everyone what their policy is on shooting N0 as a vig?
Immediately after my first post? Has everyone even posted?Alduskkel wrote:Well with your sole contribution to the game having been one word I was trying to get more content out of you.Ythan wrote:I'm looking over a lot of setup information before I look at the smaller pool of probably meaningless RVS information. Are you questioning why I'm not contributing to the noise?
Anyone with any role other than vig knows more than that.I don't think there is much to glean from the setup at this point, all we know is that we have VV or VVVV (and either way, we have at least 1 Vigilante).
Doesn't match up.I eenie meenie miney moed.Ythan wrote:Al, provide a reason for your vote on me.
Good point.What if someone says they would shoot N0? That lowers the probability that they're a Vig and makes the Mafia's job of finding power roles easier.Ythan wrote:Before anyone answers, does anyone disagree with asking everyone what their policy is on shooting N0 as a vig?
Meh, anything the town can work out is helpful.Dry-fit wrote:I don't know how useful setup speculation is going to be day 1.
vote: Beefster
RB interference is a confounding variable as well.There's really no reason for the SK and mafia not to shoot every night.
I see big help to mafia and minimal help to town. So, disagree.Ythan 36 wrote:Before anyone answers, does anyone disagree with asking everyone what their policy is on shooting N0 as a vig?
This seems blatantly anti-town.Netlava 37 wrote:No, I don't disagree.
Not quite true. SK might be trying to hide themselves, and there are corner cases where mafia might not want to kill (4 player LYLO?).Netlava 39 wrote:There's really no reason for the SK and mafia not to shoot every night.
This seems like a serious vote, so can you explain it clearly. What doesn't match up about what Alduskkel said? What's suspect about his good point?Ythan 40 wrote:Doesn't match up.I eenie meenie miney moed.Ythan wrote:Al, provide a reason for your vote on me.
Good point.What if someone says they would shoot N0? That lowers the probability that they're a Vig and makes the Mafia's job of finding power roles easier.Ythan wrote:Before anyone answers, does anyone disagree with asking everyone what their policy is on shooting N0 as a vig?
vote Alduskkel
OK.yabbaguy wrote:The big beef I have is that the random votes themselves, save for Newbie games where there's always an L-2 freakout bound to happen, is that nothing transparent ever comes out of those votes alone. Usually, yes, it's someone doing something else controversial apart from that.
Yeah, I picked a random argument that's rather trivial and saw how people reacted to it, and that being that you thinking RVS was going to help was nowhere near the mark. What do I learn:
-you're quite reasoned and level-headed
-Alduskkel has a rather impatient temper in this game, which is fascinating.
-Ythan is content to actively ignore the debate altogether. Also fascinating.
-Zajnet is reasoned when defending that same opinion I find very, very wrong. Not afraid to weigh in.
We'll see where it goes from there. That's why I inhibited the reasons, so I could get more reactions.