Mini 1011: Help! My Computer Got Infected! (Game over!)

[Tazaro]

EDIT: "I doubt there is NOT more than one vanilla townie." I'm bad with my NOT omissions sometimes.

[jelly jiggler]

It's obvious that I am claiming to be a vanilla townie. It's obvious there is only one mouse. But I really don't see why there can't be more than one vanilla. Are you saying that all of you have powers?

[Tazaro]

I meant to say that I don't think that there are NOT more than one vanilla. I'll put the edit in to repeat my point:

Well maybe it won't for you since you aren't even trying. Ah w/e I will do it anyway since I have nothing to lose. I am the mouse and I have no powers.

The people who have no powers are vanilla townies. There is not more than one mouse; I doubt there is NOT more than one vanilla townie. Your claim is suspect, jelly jiggler. <<<<< Unless a mouse is some type of tree stump?.

[UncertainKitten]

@JJ: Why do you assume I'm asking for the sake of implicating you? I actually am trying to get into your head and see what

you

consider content. I'll assess more from there.

As for your active lurking arguments...one is self defeating due to your lack of experience.
Two makes no sense for what I understand to be the definition of active lurking. Can you please elaborate how hiding your online status (something I am doing, actually), assists active lurking?
Three has two problems in that RBT is a terrible player and that I don't know what parameters you are using to describe "active lurking". If you could elaborate on these I'd appreciate it.
Four just means that you're still helping the town if you consciously avoid active lurking, and doesn't really explain how it's not a scumtell.

@Tazaro: That is a terrible argument and you should feel terrible for it. Flavor != role. In themed games, different flavor names can have the same role. I've done it in the past, though mostly offsite since I tend to use only one vanilla townie per game. I wouldn't suggest using a flavor argument.

Oh, yeah, this being a bastard game a single vanilla townie is entirely possible, but not necessarily going to happen.

[Tazaro]

What was I thinking saying "tree stump"?

[jelly jiggler]

@JJ: Why do you assume I'm asking for the sake of implicating you? I actually am trying to get into your head and see what

you

consider content. I'll assess more from there.

Why? Because people do it in every game. Vezo is the most obvious one in this game.

Now I have to leave once again. Won't be back home for at least 5 hours.

[Tazaro]

I'm a single memory module, jelly jiggler. I think there would be others.

[UncertainKitten]

Will you acquiesce to my request when you get back? I mean, hell, if I wanted you mindlessly dead with some thing justification, I'd ISO you and throw together something that looks good when I hammered. I'd rather actually discern if you are scum or not, and I believe you showing me what you believe to be content will help in that endeavor.

@Tazaro: Is there a reason you claimed your role name? Further, why are you using flavor arguments?

[Tazaro]

Guess what my power is, everyone. You'll generate flavor discussion. Please do that. And I want to suggest that flavor is very important in this context. Consider PieMan; what's the object or software that he is? It's got to be related to his post restriction.

[UncertainKitten]

...

FoS: Tazaro

That's rolefishing out the ass. Why the hell do you want people to guess your power? It'll at the very least give insight into THEIR powers. Why do you need to know what Pieman's role is?

[FakeGod]

o cool, are we speculating role/powers now?

[Tazaro]

I won't tell anyone my power even if they get it right. Lighten up, Kitty.

[Tazaro]

Double post: And you guys sure as heck better not discuss things in a way that gives away your actual powers.

[vezokpiraka]

UK is scum all the way with tazaro. Although I am not that sure about tazaro.
C'mon. You discussed with me flavor and now you are suspicious of tazaro cause he wants to discuss flavor?
Sorry that doesn't cut it for me.
You are the next day's lynch.

[UncertainKitten]

No, again, that's

not the point

. The point is, anyone guessing is very likely NOT guessing the power they have. In fact, they are not even likely to be guessing within the same broad type of role they have. i.e., a cop wouldn't guess an investigative role.

Why do you need this information? How does it help town?

@Vezok: Could you please cite sources on where I discussed flavor with you in an anti town way? I really hope you aren't broadbrushing so you can get a mislynch ^-^.

[FakeGod]

UK is scum all the way with tazaro. Although I am not that sure about tazaro.
C'mon. You discussed with me flavor and now you are suspicious of tazaro cause he wants to discuss flavor?
Sorry that doesn't cut it for me.
You are the next day's lynch.

Does this mean JJ's not scum?

[UncertainKitten]

Also, bonus points for trying to make your post more dramatic while flip flopping on Tarazo. That does not read as town .

[Tazaro]

UK is scum all the way with tazaro.

That's a stretch Come on, vezo.

[Tazaro]

UK is scum all the way with tazaro. Although I am not that sure about tazaro.
C'mon. You discussed with me flavor and now you are suspicious of tazaro cause he wants to discuss flavor?
Sorry that doesn't cut it for me.
You are the next day's lynch.

Does this mean JJ's not scum?

I assume Vezo means that JJ is THIS day's lynch.

[Tazaro]

Triple Post: Kitten, I'm not forcing anyone to discuss. I want to know if anybody can discuss flavor in a way that's strategic. It seems interesting-- to me, anyway.

[UncertainKitten]

Generally flavor discussion this early in the game aids scum more than town. It tends to give a vague bead on power roles which really doesn't help town. Now, in a massclaim scenario, flavor discussion can be a little more helpful, though with good mods, it tends to be a bunch of red herrings. Basically, as far as I know, the ideal theory of theme modding and role naming is to have massclaim hurt the town as much as possible. Flavor speculation also tends to hurt town since it leads to assumptions they shouldn't be making.

So, in general, flavor discussion is a distraction from scumhunting. Further interesting is the fact we've been having a fairly good discussion about Jelly Jiggler and suddenly you try to start up a flavor spec discussion.

[Tazaro]

Further interesting is the fact we've been having a fairly good discussion about Jelly Jiggler and suddenly you try to start up a flavor spec discussion.

That was prompted by jelly jiggler's "mouse" claim. I'm still waiting to see if M=W will put jelly jiggler at L-1. Then we would need a hammer.

[vezokpiraka]

Yeah. That part when I said with tazaro was a stretch.
UK is still scum though.

[UncertainKitten]

He's already at L-1, isn't he? Anyway, I understand that but it's still not a good direction to go in

Anyway

/me ruffles vezok's hair

How cute, you're trying to attack me with absolutely no evidence, and when asked for it decide to go dogmatic. I could just pet you you're so adorable ^-^. I'm sorry mafia doesn't work like that, but it's so cute to see the little chihuahua trying to bite me and failing ^-^.

[Tazaro]

@UncertainKitten: He has five votes against him; I voted for him and so did FakeGod when there was three votes. M=W could make six. And then the hammer.

UK is still scum though.

It's obvious that she was thinking that the way that I MYSELF was referring to flavor discussion was dangerous. It's different from the discussion she had with you because I wasn't it. Simple as pie.