Mini 1011: Help! My Computer Got Infected! (Game over!)

[FakeGod]

@SC: I believe I'm also voting for JJ.

[PieMan]

yeh p261 U beet me 2 it

[StrangerCoug]

@SC: I believe I'm also voting for JJ.

Fixed.

[Tazaro]

I urge people to suspect anyone who keeps his/her vote on gandalf.

@PieMan, Jelly Jiggler is a better vote than Gandalf. Unvote gandalf, the rest of you guys who have voted gandalf.
@JJ, answer my question in post 307. <<<You'll have no excuse to miss it>>>>

[UncertainKitten]

Aren't I the only one voting Gandalf, a.k.a Diginova? For rather well explained reasons?

[Tazaro]

Aren't I the only one voting Gandalf, a.k.a Diginova? For rather well explained reasons?

Yes. I only payed attention to the votes on JJ. Sorry.

[Tazaro]

...I didn't realize PieMan unvoted, and I forgot who the other guy was who voted gandaf.

[Tazaro]

facepalm: I looked at the vote count on p226.

[PieMan]

Yeh Taz wat iz ur deel Mahn? U hav ben overly pushy, an Im shure JJ kan c teh Million posts telling him 2 splain hiz aktionz. Pluz he seemz 2 b knot here mayb, it haz ben just @ teh 5 hour mark.

[Tazaro]

I'm kinda agitated that JJ avoided the question when he did some interaction involving his mouse roleclaiming a while ago.

[UncertainKitten]

@Pieman: What's wrong with being pushy? How does that assist scum?

[Tazaro]

Damn, I'm getting game stress. I looked at the latest vote count for votes on JJ, but when I came back I looked at 226 for the votes on Gandalf. And sorry about the triple post; I should calm down before I disperse my thoughts all over the place in multiple posts.

[jelly jiggler]

@Jelly Jiggler: WAIT A MINUTE!!! YOU DIDN'T answer the QUESTION, you scum:

If I had to vote right now I would probably vote for

screl

QUESTION: Explain this, jelly jiggler. Why screl?

[/quote]

When I was doing a reread a few days ago he was the only one that really caught my attention. Specifically the first thing I noticed were his first two posts. In post #0 he says that pieman deserves to die because of the way he talks and then in post #1 he seems to agree with xvart about him having a post restriction and yet he continues to vote for pieman. Later in post #4 he changes his vote to me and says my ideas are dangerous even though pieman was arguing for it more. I would have thought that would have made him keep his vote on pieman. Notice that my point here is not to distance myself from those ideas but to point out the inconsistencies of screl.

[PieMan]

@UK He k33pz telling peeps 2 remove their vot3 from Gandalf, knot liek there is kno reazon 4 teh vot3z 2 stai there, how mani ti3mz kan he post teh saem question 2 JJ.

@ JJ Noa while I l00k ovar 2 C waht I think of JJ's klaim, culd U give us ur ideaz currently.

[Tazaro]

When I was doing a reread a few days ago he was the only one that really caught my attention. Specifically the first thing I noticed were his first two posts. In post #0 he says that pieman deserves to die because of the way he talks and then in post #1 he seems to agree with xvart about him having a post restriction and yet he continues to vote for pieman. Later in post #4 he changes his vote to me and says my ideas are dangerous even though pieman was arguing for it more. I would have thought that would have made him keep his vote on pieman. Notice that my point here is not to distance myself from those ideas but to point out the inconsistencies of screl.

That actually makes sense. Heh.

[UncertainKitten]

@Pieman: He can post the question until it's answered. I disagree with unvoting gandalf, true, but if it's scummy for him to ask, it's a different scumminess than "he's pushy". Be more specific. Why is it bad for him to tell us to unvote gandalf? Why is it bad for him to repeat his questions?

Speaking of repeated questions, JJ, right after you left I asked a question. Please answer it.

[Tazaro]

Unvote

@tazaro We r knot all in teh comp

You're right. Like a mouse is outside. I'm glad that I made sure he answered that because I think kvart could be scummier than screl...

[jelly jiggler]

Speaking of repeated questions, JJ, right after you left I asked a question. Please answer it.

Not seeing it. But I might have already answered. Please point it out to me.

[Tazaro]

I have significant problems with the direction you are trying to take this game and your all mighty attitude about directing everyone, but I will get to that later. I just had to post this because I couldn't take it to get home and see six more pages of spam.

xvart... talking about me; a plan is brewing here in xvart's mind. This won't be good... read his posts in isolation, everyone.

[UncertainKitten]

@JJ: here. Please reply.

@Tazaro: Assume I'm lazy and spell out what precisely makes xvart having a plan bad?

[jelly jiggler]

Posts #4 - #7 by me. Notice I said "some content".

[Tazaro]

How about you drop the fake post restriction and explain to me how jumping hard and fast is defensive and being the center are appealing to emotion? PieMan - were you scum in the noob game you played? Also, how is leading people scummy? I'll do whatever I need to and use whoever I need to to get scum lynched.

The restriction is obviously not fake; kvart seems to be acerbic like Leech, who was scum in my noob game, 943, and scum like it when people say they were mafia in their previous game, because that makes those people like confirmed townies due to probability of not being scum the second time and they are therefore convenient night kills to keep around scummier looking players. Also, if the persons says they were town in their previous game, this still doesn't hurt the scum because it still gives a player who might be scum this time.
Saying how is leading people scummy, kvart? Well, I'm leading people, kvart. So is leading people scummy? No, you can say that the WAY I've been leading people is scummy, and this argument could be based on the notion of my not being able to be a town due to my wanting a policy lynch on gandalf that I retracted after knowing he's actually replacing out for not strategy reasons (he wasn't being a lurking scum) and due to my thinking that jelly jiggler could be linked to another person because of his unexplained vote. Did you know what could have been the explanation for jelly jiggler's vote, kvart? The rest of us didn't and there people were waiting for JJ to answer my question because we did not know what could have justified it. Kvart, you are raising my eyebrows. But, what do you have to say about all this. Am I a bad player?

[UncertainKitten]

I accept those posts as content. Fairly weird content, but still gives the feeling of scumhunting, or at least trying to. But it's kinda sad you have 4 posts that can be construed as such, and admit that yourself. I also don't recall you countering any of my points on active lurking. Not sure what to make of the current situation since you've started defending yourself.

I believe I'll follow with who's scum, JJ?

[Tazaro]

My two vote retractions (gandalf and jelly jiggler) and pushiness, are you going to make cases against me out of those things, xvart? I know you suspect jelly jiggler for a reason too. But noob scum is becoming a lesser possibility for what jelly jiggler is in my mind. Mouse is believable, and I am seeing myself paying attention to the notion that not all players who are town have the same object identity as I do.

[Tazaro]

double post: at least you CLAIMED you had a reason to suspect jelly jiggler as noob scum, xvart... IGMEOY