Mini 1012: Mafia In Soraville (Game Over!)

InflatablePie · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:02 am

Meanwhile, Kov is now at L-2. /triplepost

ready2rock · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:09 am

@ortiz: thank you far better stating what I was trying to say earlier about DH posting suspicions of everyone just to be suspicious of them and seem more pro-town.

I think Twornz is suspicious but I like my read on DH better and I think that DH is a much bigger threat.

TheLonging · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:23 am

I was actually at L-2 but ok. If I knew I was at L-1 I could have been in here more.

ready2rock · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:29 am

What is it with people and L-1? L-1 isn't the only time to claim/hold off on voting and wait for a defense/defend yourself more.

(see: D1 of SHM3)

TheLonging · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:50 am

See: This isn't a Large.

ortiz1193 · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:54 am

Guess I'll switch over since no one else supports a Twomz lynch :/. If kov flips town, its Twomz/DH, if Kov is scum, its Twomz/Kov/Friend.

I was rereading kov to make sure this was the right decision and I finally comprehended what's happened in the last page or so. lol at Kov voting DH to 'make him contradict himself' - major backtracking.

Ironically that's exactly what DH did at the beginning of the game... kov's flip should determine DH's alignment imo.

unvote, vote kov

Taking Pie's word for it that's it was L-2...

L-1, claim. I will rage if Pie lied to me and this is a hammer.

-----

r2r, the same principles in SHM don't apply to smaller games, plus parama just did that to be a douche and prove a point that no one was arguing. And L-1 claims are better than L-11 claims. >_>

TheLonging · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:58 am

I approve of this lynch. But when Kov flips scum, we should lynch DH tomorrow, mmk?

ortiz1193 · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:07 am

I was thinking a scum flip would be indicative of DH being town since he was the one who started putting pressure on Kov early in the game.

TheLonging · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:09 am

Which is how he tried to cover up for his backtracking behavior early in the game with Jack + IP + Friend. Which, I may remind you, is what he's wanting to lynch Kov for.

sorasgoof · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:13 am

Day 1 Vote Totals

If there is a mistake, point it out.
Last post seen:

TheLonging,

page 19.

[5] Kov:

TheLonging, DemonHybrid, Friend, InflatablePie, ortiz1193 [L-2]

[2] InflatablePie:

Jack, Fugitive [L-5]

[2] TheLonging:

esuriospiritus, Haschel Cedricson [L-5]

[2] Jack:

Twomz, Kov [L-5]

[1] DemonHybrid:

ready2rock [L-6]

[0/6] No Lynch:

None

[0/6] Deadline Extension:

None

Not Voting:

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Deadline is August 5th, at 11:59 ET.

ortiz1193 · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:14 am

Meh, we can wait until the flip. I've got a gut feeling that something is wrong with this wagon... it built fast.

Preview Edit: Pie. >_________________> Be wrong less.

InflatablePie · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:16 am

I fail at math. Keep thinking it's 6 to lynch for some reason. D:

Friend · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:35 am

Ortiz, what's your case on me again?

ortiz1193 · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:42 am

It's in my mind, I haven't posted it yet. >_> It has to do with you jumping around on the largest wagons and a few other small things. You've posted a lot so I'll have to do a lot of quote digging, combined with the fact that I'm more focused on Twomz/KoV/DH, I haven't exactly had the incentive to spend time on it.

Jack · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:28 am

back and read up, but a bit much for me to take in at the moment.

Friend · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:41 am

Okay, just checking.

DemonHybrid · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:38 pm

TheLonging wrote:Which is how he tried to cover up for his backtracking behavior early in the game with Jack + IP + Friend. Which, I may remind you, is what he's wanting to lynch Kov for.

Because Kov's plan didn't accomplish anything. He compared it to Jack voting IP with no reason, when, in fact, Jack did have a reason to vote IP. So, Kov's vote for you and Jack's vote for IP are wildly different.

TheLonging · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:54 pm

No, I'm talking about earlier (note why Friend's name is there)

DemonHybrid · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:07 pm

I know what you're talking about. I'm talking about the latter part of your sentence: Why I want to lynch Kov when I "did the same thing he did"...which I didn't. Kov had a terrible plan which did nothing based on a logical fallacy. I found scum in IP and possibly you. There's your difference.

ISO · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:58 pm

Quick note: I've been reading, but I have a ton of homework due at midnight so don't expect any analysis until tomorry.

Twomz · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:18 am

Just saying, every time I check the thread I think how funny it would be to toss a hammer if someone gets to L-1. Take that into consideration when waiting til there to claim

.

TheLonging · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:27 am

Sigh DH... I THINK you know what I'm talking about, you're just not making the connection. I'm not going to waste further time.

FoS: DemonHybrid, InflatablePie

Do we have a scumteam here? 2/3 I bet

DemonHybrid · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:48 am

TheLonging wrote:Sigh DH... I THINK you know what I'm talking about, you're just not making the connection. I'm not going to waste further time.

FoS: DemonHybrid, InflatablePie

Do we have a scumteam here? 2/3 I bet

No kidding? An FoS? You don't say.

Is that kind of like the countless posts that you've made saying that I'm part of the scumteam?

Kov · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:49 am

DemonHybrid wrote:
Um, right.

Except that Jack gave some reasoning
later on
and expressed why he was accusing Pie, perhaps in a quiet way, but at least he did.

My reason was to get you to show how you are contradicting yourself. See bolded. I did the same as Jack he votes and gives reasons much later. I decided to vote with no reasons to emulate Jack. You find it scummy for me but not for him. THAT'S WHAT A CONTRADICTION IS! Voting for TL means nothing against him I don't see as scummy. I choose him as it would draw most attention.

I see your post as a flat out lie. You would vote TL to get me to contradict myself?

Your wrong and Yes because I'm pretty sure you and Jack are buddies.

DemonHybrid · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:56 am

Kov wrote:
DemonHybrid wrote:
Um, right.

Except that Jack gave some reasoning
later on
and expressed why he was accusing Pie, perhaps in a quiet way, but at least he did.
My reason was to get you to show how you are contradicting yourself. See bolded. I did the same as Jack he votes and gives reasons much later. I decided to vote with no reasons to emulate Jack. You find it scummy for me but not for him. THAT'S WHAT A CONTRADICTION IS! Voting for TL means nothing against him I don't see as scummy. I choose him as it would draw most attention.

I see your post as a flat out lie. You would vote TL to get me to contradict myself?
Your wrong and Yes because I'm pretty sure you and Jack are buddies.

He had a valid reason. You didn't. I don't see how that's so hard to understand.

Why vote TL when, if you think Jack and I are scum buddies, Jack suspected IP over everyone else? He even said that he thinks TL is town. Just curious.