I know that. I'm not going to stop being suspicious of you just because you claim, though.TheLonging wrote:Has, you DO realize why I've claimed right?
It's funny how it's always the powerroles that get bandwagoned to the point of claiming first.
Meh, I wish.Jack wrote:up to page 14:
DH
haschel
esurio
Is my pick for scumteam. Feeling pretty good.
Mind elaborating on why you think this (other than being convinced Pie is scum either way)? I don'tIf he flips scum Pie is 100% scum.
You have a habit of keeping your vote on someone but pushing for someone else's lynch. You did this with TL, too.DemonHybrid wrote:I like the pressure on Twomz. However, I don't want Slippery "Kov" McSlick over here getting away.
Yeah, I don't see the problem with that. Active scumhunting means never to let your suspicions go of one person. I don't like Kov. I don't like Twomz a little less, but wouldn't mind pressure on him to get reads.InflatablePie wrote:You have a habit of keeping your vote on someone but pushing for someone else's lynch. You did this with TL, too.DemonHybrid wrote:I like the pressure on Twomz. However, I don't want Slippery "Kov" McSlick over here getting away.
I switched to Kov because I know with the claim a TL lynch isn't going to happen today; leaving my vote would be a waste of time. Also, I haven't said anything about lynching Kov for information-purposes; my vote on Kov is because of his contradictions and actions surrounding his vote for Jack and argument with DH.ortiz1193 wrote:HC/Esurio connection is strange. Both pushed TL until he claimed, then both switched to Kov. Both are pushing kov over Twomz for information-purposes which makes me cringe. Both have hardly posted until called out, and their posting styles are similar. Playing a pretty similar game... just something to take note of.
I WANT AT LEAST 10,000 WORDS OR YOU CAN'T VOTE, NOW GIVE ME A TRIPLE PBPA OF EVERY PLAYER IN THE GAME INCLUDING EVERY GAME FROM THEIR META OR UNVOTE NOWDemonHybrid wrote: Jack is on drugs or something. I'm still waiting you to answer my question. I said it once, and here it is again: EPIC question dodge. Why is that post scummy to you? Why is the fact that I called what you did an epic question dodge scummy? What was it about your re-read that was scummy?
In fact, make a PBPA. I want you to speak a little more now.
So, you aren't willing to go indepth to create a valid case on me, in other words.Jack wrote:I WANT AT LEAST 10,000 WORDS OR YOU CAN'T VOTE, NOW GIVE ME A TRIPLE PBPA OF EVERY PLAYER IN THE GAME INCLUDING EVERY GAME FROM THEIR META OR UNVOTE NOWDemonHybrid wrote: Jack is on drugs or something. I'm still waiting you to answer my question. I said it once, and here it is again: EPIC question dodge. Why is that post scummy to you? Why is the fact that I called what you did an epic question dodge scummy? What was it about your re-read that was scummy?
In fact, make a PBPA. I want you to speak a little more now.
This week on "inside the mafia play book" we have special guest DemonHybrid, who will explain to our viewers how to poison the wellDemonHybrid wrote: So, you aren't willing to go indepth to create a valid case on me, in other words.
Town vs. town.Jack wrote:This week on "inside the mafia play book" we have special guest DemonHybrid, who will explain to our viewers how to poison the wellDemonHybrid wrote: So, you aren't willing to go indepth to create a valid case on me, in other words.without looking scummy and anxiousto discredit a vote from a townie.
Oh, I'm doing nothing to discredit your vote. In fact, nothing of what I'm saying has anything to do with your vote.Jack wrote:This week on "inside the mafia play book" we have special guest DemonHybrid, who will explain to our viewers how to poison the wellDemonHybrid wrote: So, you aren't willing to go indepth to create a valid case on me, in other words.without looking scummy and anxiousto discredit a vote from a townie.
DemonHybrid wrote:
In fact, make a PBPA. I want you to speak a little more now.
Consistent? Yeah, I don't think so. I can't remember when someone's openly confronted Jack instead of just voting for him and leaving the convo be, but I can't be halfassed to ISO everyone, so if you find something, let me know.ortiz1193 wrote:DemonHybrid wrote:
In fact, make a PBPA. I want you to speak a little more now.
Does this make anyone else lol? Jack is playing consistent with his play all game, which DH has avidly supported and talked up, but as soon as its vs. him its time to change.