Erm, my eyes are bleeding. Does no one here study biology?
A
DNA Decoder
is, in essence, someone who decodes DNA. The best example of these types of scientists are those who worked on the Genome Project, decoding the human DNA, and finding out what each sequence represents. One does not decode DNA in forensics, one matches it to others (DNA profiling). While methods such as electrophoresis may involve using DNA/RNA/proteins, though it is based on running the given sample and analyzing how it compares to a known sample. In essence, DNA profiling, which is the identification of individuals through the use of their respective DNA profiles, does not, in any way, involve DNA decoding. A simple example of this principal (while not necessarily DNA profiling), is fingerprints. This was what also suggested to me that shotty's claim is not entirely believable.
To put it short, zwek's claim of Evidence Collector (or something along that line) is believable as it is what occurs at a crime scene, but a DNA decoder simply does not exist in the realm forensics, and I doubt, in this game.
p.s. I do not know how clearly I explained everything, so if any part is confusing, just ask. I still think shotty's claim is BS, though prox's bad play made him an easy target.
Fluffy fluffy~~~ |
"READING KATSUKI IS LIKE SOME SORT OF POSTMODERN ARTFORM"
- GreyICE
Katsuki is by far more absurdly beautiful than Fate.
(hai parama)
Katsuki's Madness coming to you shortly: Nov, 2011!
.