Elmo wrote:Let's restate. You think she's scum, clearly voting her is fine, but that is based on things that happened in Day 0; so you must have suspected her back then, but didn't question or pressure her, in order to get good info for later. To me, it looks a little like you didn't actually do anything until Day 1, where you're sort-of-required to throw a vote out. Do you see my view?
I did suspect her back then. In fact, take a look at post 0 in my iso. However, Day 0 was Boring Mechanics Day.
Also I'm not required to throw a vote out at the beginning of Day 1. But I want to see Hoopla hang, see.
mith wrote:Papa Zito, Troll: You two have hydra'd together several times. I'd be interested in your current reads on each other
Papa Zito be unable to read Troll in a reliable way. Papa Zito finds him be quite capable of masking true intent while appearing as a paragon of towniness.
That said, I think his hider stuff Day 0 was terrible and more scum-motivated than town. Also law of averages.
Troll wrote:@Papa Zito, what be your opinion about games without alignment reveals? (Mind you, Troll believes Troll knows the answer to that but would prefer that you be the one who shares it now.) What made you pick janitor as one of the two roles you would like to give scum?
I find them crippling. What was that one game... I think it was Plum's, where you'd lynch people but they wouldn't flip right away, and you'd have to vote them again to make them flip. It was absolutely maddening.
ITT though the janitor is one-shot, and that's what attracted me. I like the idea of giving scum a role they can only use once, and then effectively become vanilla.
Hoopla wrote:Oh wait, how am I missing out on the KMD wagon?
Duh.
Vote: KMD
Haha look at this.