Xite wrote:2) Just pointing out that you failed to realize that I was voting someone else.
I knew you were voting for someone else at the time of my post. You absolutely were not at the time of the post I quoted. Just because you changed your vote later, does not erase the circumstances around the situation prior. Notice how you're trying to dismiss this point without defending it?
Xite wrote:3) That, my good sir, depends on how well I played and the people left playing after me.
There is never an excuse to intentionally act scummy. No matter how you slice it, you would be making a suspect out of the only player in this game you knew to be town. That is absolutely no different then trying to draw suspicion on someone you knew to be innocent via cop investigation to keep the game moving. In either case you would be intentionally making a player you know to be town, appear to be scum. Doesn't matter how you play it, it's bad for the town to do this. Every vote cast on that player can be justified by the fact that you were being scummy.
Xite wrote:4) I thought I had said it, hence my saying it now, so that you have it if I do contradict myself.
Your reasoning and justifications are laughably transparent. You are saying it now, because you claimed to have said something earlier that you did not. It's actually comical how you claim to not have enough time to ISO yourself to see if you actually have said something before, yet you have time to post as often as you do. What you are describing translates to posting frequently without thought, and using that as an excuse for your contradictions.
Xite wrote:5) I was attempting to clear my good name, since you seem so hellbent on sullying it.
You felt the need to defend yourself from an accusation I was making about Wendy? I wasn't drawing into question your post, rather the fact that Wendy was claiming Prana's actions were in place of yours.
Xite wrote:I guess I didn't call them as a scumteam, just voted one and FoS'd the other, but honestly, how short is that of actually calling them a scumteam?
I consider it the difference between night and day, actually. Just because you FOS a person while voting another doesn't translate to your thinking they are a scumteam. Suggesting such is an incredible stretch.
Xite wrote:The other thing is that what I meant is that townies should for the most part be able to be consistent without having to check back on what they've said because they feel stronger about it.
Considering you haven't been consistent, what does that say about you, by your own logic? I won't push that very far, because you are entirely wrong on the subject. In every game I do my best to check whether or not I've actually said something, or if it was just a thought at the time. Considering I do have suspicions and thoughts that I don't post, it makes it easy for the scum to call a claim I make in the game that I haven't posted. Checking to see if you've actually posted something, instead of it being a thought you've had is not a scum tell.
Tomorrow Wendy wrote:He was supposed to be the first to claim. He says that he understood the setup and the goal of the massclaim, and chose not to claim like he was supposed to because "Scum early on would play safe and claim vanilla" -- a contradiction, right? I think he is lying about it, and lying is a symptom of begin scum, right?
You are not taking into consideration that the phase was the RVS where you most players will make joke posts. When I read Iam's post I thought it was a joke as well. It wasn't until later that I realized he was actually trying to accomplish something with it. While Iam said "it's no joke" I still didn't see the point in it. The "gambit" was ruined by players not taking it seriously, as a whole. No one player was responsible for it not working. Your method of thinking can be applied to every other player in this game.
HF wrote:To those getting suspicious of tw...does that change the way you view dalt's play?
No. Dalt's apparent meta on this site is posting next to nothing and getting replaced. I don't see how anything can actually be taken seriously from that. If you're going to meta, you should consider that the last time he's done that he was town. Looking at both sides of it, nothing can really be learned from his alignment from his actions.
Tomorrow Wendy wrote:please cooperate. can't catch scum if I state goal of questioning prior to receiving answers.
You're clearly trying to get everyone to answer those questions to see how that compare to Prana's. Which would only work if the entire situation was anything other than null.
