It is the last, I wasn't really paying attention. Mysterio's post didn't seem to answer the opportunism. And I'm a sheWickedestjr wrote:flinter's beginning to raise my suspicions. First the bad points against Xite and now he has completely ignored Mysterio's defense of my point against him. It's like either he wants to sit back and watch me decide the next move or he isn't paying attention to the person he's voting for.
Investigation
The reasons I followed:
The factsWickedestjr wrote:Mysterio:
First he votes JDodge for being so confident in his read on Danakillsu, but then later decides the case against Danakillsu was good (the case consisted of things that had happened before Mysterio voted JDodge). He looks like opportunistic scum. If the case against Danakillsu was really that good, then why did he vote JDodge after it happened before he eventually switched to Dana?Vote: Mysterio
Mysterio wrote:Unvote
Vote: JDodge
Way too sure of his reads this early in the game when half the players haven't even posted yet.
Mysterio wrote:@dana, what specifically has Frank done to make you think he is scum? So far, I've only gathered an OMGUS vote and you complaining that he might be making a weak case against you (hint: it's not weak). These are not scum tells, that is simply you pissed off at the notion that someone wants you lynched.
Also, I still don't understand how anyone can be so sure of a read this early in the game. It could very well be possible that dana is just playing terribly, you can't know for sure. To act as if it's an open and shut case and we should lynch a few pages after the game started is ridiculous. Both JDodge and now Frank are guilty of this.
Now, the first quote of Mysterio is his second vote. As I read it, it wasn't intended to be random, but the vote on Jdodge is bad. In the second post, he pulls the breaks on the Dana wagon. It's going too fast, people are too confident.Mysterio wrote:Not at all. I said your case wasn't weak, not that dana is sure fire scum, which is what you've continuously implied in your posts. He is indeed the scummiest playerFurcolow wrote:Thank you for saying my case isn't weak. You flip-flop on this somewhat by discrediting it for being early on in the game.so far, which is why I wanted to give him a chance to explain his weak scumhunting case against you. Having said that...
This is a completely worthless reply. I asked you to explain yourself, not just repeat your claims. I saw no contradictions in his posts, and everything else you've just repeated is exactly what I already categorized as you thinking Frank has a weak case against you. Even if I were to accept your claims 100%, at worst it simply means Frank is wrong about you. It does NOT, however, mean that he is scummy. That is something you've failed to make a valid case for.dana wrote:@ Mysterio
I could understand if you didn't read the thread, but if you did...what? How can you not know what Furc has done? The very first post I made in our argument lays it out clearly. His posts have been full of self-contradictions, confusing/invalid logic, and assumptions used as proof. He wants UA lynched more but is voting for me, for instance. And he wants the day to end ASAP judging by the nature of his posts.
As it happens, you've neither shown that Frank is wrong or explained how he is scummy. As such, I'll go ahead andUnvote,Vote: dana.
And suddenly, by the next post, when Frank mentions that Mysterio gives off a mixed signal, he follows the largest bandwagon. That is opportunism.
Now, his defensive post in no way answers the problem that Mysterio went from "he isn't surefire scum and he might be a terrible player" to "vote Dana". I don't really care about "the case that he agreed with", I care about his switch in thoughts about how the game should be played day 1 (from opposing to joining the bandwagon)
. And I have commented on their agurment, saying it gave me a headache, because honestly I just found it dumb. But why only focus on those two? There is several people who have commented on other people play style, but it seem everyone who confronts me always ask why I haven't commented on them two :<. Honestly neither of those two people seem scum to me, thats my opinion on them. Now I predict about 7 people are going to attack me because I said that. If I have something to say/comment on/defend/attack or w/e I will post. Out of 24 people, I'm more then sure not all of them have posted, I am confident to say at least 15 people have posted out of 24, but yes lets focus on the guy who is posting, just not anything that is worth wild.
.
