Herodotus wrote:Ekim, do you generally lurk as town? As scum?
I generally lurk as either when I can't think of anything useful to say. If anything I'd say I lurk more as town, as I find it quite easy to fabricate townie-looking things to say as scum, and quite hard to do useful "behavioral" scumhunting as town, especially early on.
Also I've just attended a funeral and am working quit hard to finish my MSc so my time has been limited. I'm still going to try to put the time in and play, but I find it difficult to find something worth saying in a large game. Hopefully this will improve.
Herodotus wrote:Do you have opinions on anyone, including the person you're voting (Hoopla)?
I have several town reads that I don't think it'd be useful to share.
I've been thinking about it and I don't think Hoopla's performance is coming from scum. I've been in a game with her with her as town and me as scum and she melted down when backed into a corner in a fairly similar way. That was at the end of a game, but it's a similar style of thing. So Hoopla acting like this as town isn't out of character. She said she's never used AtE as scum, and her meltdown here would be a pretty lame way to start. If I've been fooled then I'll feel a bit silly after the game, but I don't think I have.Therefore:
UNVOTE: Hoopla
In terms of current wagons and suspects.
I don't like the Hoopla wagon for the above reasons.
Vasudeva is playing... badly and drawing attention for it. Feels like such an easy target. I've seen similar things for him in another game. Bah, I hate wagons on players with terrible style generally, for their style. How can you evaluate whether it's coming from scum? I don't know. Feels more townie.
I think the possible slip on zoraster is decent and (rare D1) concrete evidence---he seems to assume she's town when explaining why she's scum.
VOTE: zoraster