Mini 1045: M&L:BIS! Game Over

[Katsuki]

Is there anything you would like to provide for us Calciscum? Or are you just gonna keep going with the "everyone follow me and vote kat cuz kat

"never"

policy votes ppl even though that's not true" shtick?

[Calcifer]

Ain't it great that Katsuki's calling us scum without even voting for us?
Can anyone else say Cognitive Dissonance?

[Katsuki]

Mario doesn't need vote in order to call you scum.

[Calcifer]

ITT we learn:
Katsuki doesn't know basic grammar.
Katsuki claimed Mario?

[gandalf5166]

WTF? Claim already?

[Calcifer]

Unvote, Vote: Katsuki

[CryMeARiver]

*clicks suicide button*

[gandalf5166]

Unvote, Vote: Katsuki

[Katsuki]

Oh my didn't expect gandalf there.

Any others wanna hop on?

[Katsuki]

Also lol, calc was already voting me.

[CryMeARiver]

Also lol, calc was already voting me.

Yes, I think I will, until you explain the bullshit reason you had for even thinking of softclaiming.
UNVOTE: UnvoteVOTE: Vote: Katsuki

[Calcifer]

The unvote/revote was for effect.

Anyone else want to earn some brownie points?

[gandalf5166]

Also lol, calc was already voting me.

Yes, I think I will, until you explain the bullshit reason you had for even thinking of softclaiming.
UNVOTE: UnvoteVOTE: Vote: Katsuki

You quoted the wrong post

[Calcifer]

lol @ CMAR. XD

Votecount would be nice, Ani.

[Calcifer]

Is there anything you would like to provide for us Calciscum? Or are you just gonna keep going with the "everyone follow me and vote kat cuz kat "never" policy votes ppl even though that's not true" shtick?

Prove us wrong, then. THAT shouldn't be too difficult of a task... right?

[animorpherv1]

Vote Count!

Katsuki (4): Calcifer, jimfinn, gandalf5166, CryMeARiver
gandalf5166 (1): Framm 18
drmyshottyizsik (1): Katsuki

Not voting (6): mallowgeno, CSL, Tangion, drmyshottyizsik, mothrax, CostumeParty

detal? I probably mean detail, but if you can show me what you mean, it may be different.

With 12 alive it's 7 to lynch!
Deadline is on September 20th at 3:21 PM EST!

[Calcifer]

Actually, Kat. Don't prove us wrong. Let us prove your wrong. Here's a COMPLETE list of completed games you were in:

Newbie 955 Kat was town. Opened up the RVS with some generic SE stuff, then votes someone for not participating in the RVS.
DNA Evidence Kat was town. Defended himaself first, then voted DJ for a creepy avatar.
Newbie 949 Kat was town. Voted for the Mod.
Prison Mafia Kat was town, replaced in. Jokingly suggests a policy lynch of IH.
Mafia War Kat was town. Votes mod again.

So nope, no policy votes there.

[mothrax]

I don't like how quickly this wagon has run up... there is scum on it... especially considering that six of twelve players have posted and four of those are voting for kat.
Calcifer: we have (well one of your heads and I) similar experienc with docwhosiwhatsit, and I agree, if he is scum he will slip, but if he is town he will also scumslip... so he will be lynched either way, so why not get it out of the way D1? Option one, we hit scum D1 and move on to d2, option 2, we myslynch but get rid of an incredibly anti-town player.

This is one policy lynch I am down with...
VOTE: drmyshottyizsik

[Calcifer]

I don't like how quickly this wagon has run up... there is scum on it... especially considering that six of twelve players have posted and four of those are voting for kat.
Calcifer: we have (well one of your heads and I) similar experienc with docwhosiwhatsit, and I agree, if he is scum he will slip, but if he is town he will also scumslip... so he will be lynched either way, so why not get it out of the way D1? Option one, we hit scum D1 and move on to d2, option 2, we myslynch but get rid of an incredibly anti-town player.

This is one policy lynch I am down with...
VOTE: drmyshottyizsik

WE. ARE. NOT. LYNCHING. DMSIS. NOW. Tomorrow, maybe.
Katsuki is today. DMSIS cannot run a scumgroup by himself.
There is scum on almost every wagon, so go ahead and get on this one. Katsuki is the superior lynch.
WE ARE NOT LYNCHING DMSIS NOW. AGAIN FOR EFFECT. DMSIS CLAIMED SCUM IN GHOSTBUSTERS MAFIA.
Its only a matter of time.

And did you miss the fact that KATSUKI CLAIMED MARIO. AND HE DIDN'T SAY IT WAS A JOKE. OBV_SCUM. LYNCH.

[quote="Option one, we hit scum D1 and move on to d2, option 2, we myslynch but get rid of an incredibly anti-town player.[/quote]
HORRID. SCUM_LYNCH IS ALWAYS SUPERIOR TO ANTI-TOWN LYNCH.

FoS: mothrax

[Calcifer]

Tag fail.
Also, mothrax is #1 scumbuddy to Katsuki ATM.

[mothrax]

So because I am not voting the way you want me to I am scummy? I saw the softclaim, and I saw the pressure as a response, but I don't feel comfortable putting someone at l-2 with 5 people still to post when I don't have a strong read on them. Opportunistic scum would love this to end in a quicklynch. And I am not going to vote for them because you tell me that this isn't the way they play, especially when others are saying otherwise.

[jimfinn]

Let us assume for for the sake of negation that Katsuki is truly Mario and is a town-aligned role. The role of Mario in this game would likely be a PR. Any person with any knowledge of the flavor ought to assume that. Therefore, to claim Mario without full-claiming would likely draw a NK, which would cause the death of one of the town's PRs. Therefore, no pro-town player with any common sense would possibly perform such an action. Katsuki is most likely scum, and even if town, a better policy lynch than DMSIS because Kat has already performed a blatantly anti-town action.

[Calcifer]

So because I am not voting the way you want me to I am scummy? I saw the softclaim, and I saw the pressure as a response, but I don't feel comfortable putting someone at l-2 with 5 people still to post when I don't have a strong read on them. Opportunistic scum would love this to end in a quicklynch. And I am not going to vote for them because you tell me that this isn't the way they play, especially when others are saying otherwise.

Because you are voting for a policy lynch over a real lynch, yes, you are scummy. Because you ignored our case on kat and STILL tried to go through with the same policy lynch he was trying to push, yes, you are scummy.

If scum quicklynch at L-2, then that means we've lost 1 townie in exchange for netting 2 scum, which is something I can definitely live with. Can't you?

That's not the only reason we're telling you to vote.

[Calcifer]

I don't like how quickly this wagon has run up... there is scum on it... especially considering that six of twelve players have posted and four of those are voting for kat.

Where are the scum? Why do you disagree with the vote?

I also have experience with Shotty. He replaced in, nailed scum, got nightkilled. I disapprove of policy lynched because 1) they don't give people a chance to improve, 2) they rarely hit scum, 3) they're lazy, and 4) they lynch anti-town over scum. Now, if you'd like to explain why a Shotty policy lynch will actually be BENEFICIAL to the town (I mean, if you didn't want to play with him, maybe you shouldn't of signed up for the game), then I'll listen. Otherwise, I'll need some reasons for why you're still stuck voting in the RVS and deciding to ignore our legitimate vote completely.

[Calcifer]

And I am not going to vote for them because you tell me that this isn't the way they play, especially when others are saying otherwise.

I'm not telling you. I'm SHOWING you. I'm giving you solid proof. So disprove it, or don't say things like this, okay?