Mafia on Holy Orders (Game Over!)

[Iecerint]

Can revote if someone decides that he is lying 95% chance or greater or whatever.

[Plum]

Sorry! Catching up.

[Plum]

Also I didn't even get the prod yet - again!

>.> ~Vi

[Plum]

MOTHRAX: Is there any flavor thar beyond that? Why track AGar, pray?

[Furcolow]

unvote

[mothrax]

MOTHRAX: Is there any flavor thar beyond that? Why track AGar, pray?

not much no, my abilities (tracking, voting, etc...)

And I have been very vocal about having a scumread on AGar since D1. Why not track my biggest suspect.

[curiouskarmadog]

unvote, vote pacman

[curiouskarmadog]

unvote

wait a minute..can you point out where you thought Agar was scum day 1.

[mothrax]

posts 7-9 on my iso are addressed to AGar and from D1 and while I didn't come out and directly call him scum, I did want to keep an eye on him, both litrally and figuratively. As for d2, reread my list of scumspects... a majority of my posts not concerning furcolow have been concerning AGar.

[curiouskarmadog]

you went from,

And I have been very vocal about having a scumread on AGar since D1. Why not track my biggest suspect.

to

while I didn't come out and directly call him scum, I did want to keep an eye on him, both litrally and figuratively. As for d2, reread my list of scumspects... a majority of my posts not concerning furcolow have been concerning AGar.

so the fact you "track" him and you didnt see him do anything, made you suspect him more?

[Iecerint]

So...did your null track on AGar affect your feelings about him?

[curiouskarmadog]

these are the posts that you "were vocal about"? about on day 1.

AGar,I am curious, If I were to "me too" vote and follow you would you be any less of an asswhole? I see you do it all the time, you just use more words than I do. Sorry, not in the habit of posting Wall o' Texts, never will unless it is an ISO.

yes AGar, you followed the wagon on wraith when your vezo push didn't work out and your most recent vote on vezo comes right after a vote on vezo from plum.
and it comes with only this under a bunch of "Plum is Good"

If so, I agree quite wholeheartedly with that. Actually, I can agree with that statement in regards to almost all of his posts.

Friend wagon fizzles, and I'm not gonna stick with my vote on a dead wagon when scum's a ripe for lynchin'.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: vezokpiraka

I call that "me too"

Also, to say I am butthurt implies that I give a rats ass. I play mafia for fun, not out of some latent need to assert my badassedness. So we're here for different reasons, I just wanted to know if I needed gloves to stop the constant facepalms from bruising.

Apologies AGar, I misread the votecount. When I said wraith I meant friennnd. Just pointing out your buddying to plum.

also, yout 10th post was...

VOTE: furcolow
his seeking approval strikes me as trying to distance homself from a mislynch.

uhhhh?

your vote was on Fur before you jumped on the wraith wagon...why not track him?

[curiouskarmadog]

also, did you leave a crumb as to your targeting of agar?

where..

if not, why or why not?

[mothrax]

Just because I got a null track on him doesn't mean he is clean... could be a prless scum who didn't submit the kill... I am not going to ignore my reads on him when I am nt a cop, a nulltrack is not as clearing as an innocent.

preview edit: AGar is my number one scumread, however his lynch is unlikely as he seems to have backing from plum and no one else seems to want to contradict that little makeshift alliance. Why vote for someone who has little chance of being lynched. I figured if I saw him visit someone who turned up dead or someone who was blocked... etc... it would enable me to push his lynch much more actively.
Furc is scumspect number two and the vote for him came after what looked(looks) like a large slip to me, but after it became apparent that lynch wasn't going to happen it was time to move on again.

and no there was no crumb. something I am working on in my play is crumbing and softclaiming, not so great at it (i usually end up fullclaiming by the time anyone sees it) so I didn't even attempt it.

[pacman281292]

Just because I got a null track on him doesn't mean he is clean... could be a prless scum who didn't submit the kill... I am not going to ignore my reads on him when I am nt a cop, a nulltrack is not as clearing as an innocent.

Indeed, null track won't clear AGar.

preview edit: AGar is my number one scumread, however his lynch is unlikely as he seems to have backing from plum and no one else seems to want to contradict that little makeshift alliance.

Whuh? I can't see such alliance. My read on AGar is null BTW if you ask me.

Why vote for someone who has little chance of being lynched.

Because you can't just go and vote someone you don't feel is scum. Just shifting your vote around won't help to your case, and makes you look scummy if you ask me.

I figured if I saw him visit someone who turned up dead or someone who was blocked... etc... it would enable me to push his lynch much more actively.

That's why trackers do track. However, tracking might bring lots of WIFOM after a claimed result on certain circumstances.

Furc is scumspect number two and the vote for him came after what looked(looks) like a large slip to me, but after it became apparent that lynch wasn't going to happen it was time to move on again.

See above.

and no there was no crumb. something I am working on in my play is crumbing and softclaiming, not so great at it (i usually end up fullclaiming by the time anyone sees it) so I didn't even attempt it.

No trouble I guess. Getting one of your breadcrumbs caught by scum might be quite nasty.

[Socrates]

unvote, vote:Mothrax

[Iecerint]

Null track doesn't clear AGar, but it's probably as close to clearing him as a track is able.

I'm personally guilty of not trusting my negative tracks at times, though.

[Socrates]

Mothrax is totally scum guys.

[mothrax]

preview edit: AGar is my number one scumread, however his lynch is unlikely as he seems to have backing from plum and no one else seems to want to contradict that little makeshift alliance.

Whuh? I can't see such alliance. My read on AGar is null BTW if you ask me.

Why vote for someone who has little chance of being lynched.

Because you can't just go and vote someone you don't feel is scum. Just shifting your vote around won't help to your case, and makes you look scummy if you ask me.

I never voted someone I don't see as scum, I just voted for lesser scumspects. I have a strong scumread on furc, and a strong one on AGar. I also had scummy read on wraith. I voted where I thought my vote would be the most usefull.
And it is probably the way I read it, but I see some of the exchanges D1 between agar and plum as buddying and plum seems to hold a hi influence over a decent portion of the town (socrates' pledging his vote to her?)

preview edit: I am really tired or seeing posts like that.
"so and so is totally scum you guys..."
please elaborate. If you want me lynched fine, but you are going to have to try harder than that.

[Socrates]

You are confirmed scum. That's why.

[mothrax]

oh? I thought I had claimed town tracker... I must have been mistaken... unless you see something I don't.

[Socrates]

I am not explaining.

[Plum]

MOTHRAX: Is there any flavor thar beyond that? Why track AGar, pray?

not much no, my abilities (tracking, voting, etc...)

And I have been very vocal about having a scumread on AGar since D1. Why not track my biggest suspect.

That's funny. Because the sample Town PM doesn't list voting as an ability at all, and my PM (which might or might not be the same as the Sample PM) doesn't list voting as an ability at all.

EDIT: Socrates is right, in any case.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: mothrax

[Friend]

Envoy of good? What kind of a name is that for a tracker? An envoy is a messenger, an agent; not someone who tracks. I don't see how the name fits with the role.

Tracker is a really easy and good scum fakeclaim and I'm not backing down from mothrax because of the claim. He's still scum, I'm pretty sure, and Socrates' latest posts make it even more apparent.

[Friend]

Also, Plum is right - there is not a vote ability.