The way CKD summarized the QT doesn't put SS in a positive light-
Still, we should lynch Espy now.
What the hell?Jack wrote:espy wagon is nothing but laziness
Jack wrote:Sorry, don't feel like putting in the work right now.DemonHybrid wrote:What the hell?Jack wrote:espy wagon is nothing butlaziness
Can you explain this?
Oh, the irony of a VI complaining that somebody else is unreadable :igmeoy:Vezok wrote: I can't get volkan in a scum or town category.
Ahhh.
SS is wrong. If there is scum in your pair, then plainly they stand to gain by having a free NK. And, for the same reason that OSVs shouldn't claim that they are OS (though, interestingly, I think that it's perfectly legit for multi-shot-vigs to lie and say they are OSVs...), it was anti-town of her to claim that you were OS.CKD wrote: The first paragraph, given that we are indeed a one shot CPR Doc, if one of us dies (the other can use the ability without having to come to a consensus), and the other is scum, do you think that scum will get "extra" help? Why do you think here that SS is saying they dont? (BTW: I just doubled checked the PM again, and yes, the other can make the decision alone.) Do you feel that a.) that is scummy to misrepresent that and b.) do you feel it was a good move as town to mention the one shot part? Also do you understand/agree with SS's vote on me?
There's no scum motivation for your actions. And, in light of you being OS and suspecting your neighbour, there is an obvious, if not universally accepted, pro-town one.CKD wrote: 2nd paragraph, first of all, this is a completely untrue statement. I DID discuss it in the QT thread, my neighbor, decided to quit posting in there. I did not go behind ANYONE's back and I stated my intentions clearly. But for WIFOM sake, what possible motivation could I have as scum to coming forward? IF I was scum, wouldnt it have been easier (and a much better play) to shut my mouth today, kill off my neighbor tonight, and simply use the CPR doc on someone I knew wasnt going to be killed? I am interested in hearing theories here..
You didn't think of this before?SS wrote: Hmm, actually, now I understand why you wanted to claim...in a weird way. I don't think you went about it in the right way, since you brought too much attention to yourself in a bad way, but thinking that I was a part of the scum faction, and I could communicate to them to kill you tonight (which I didn't understand you were getting at earlier), it would make sense for you to want to draw attention to us so that if I were scum, I would automatically be the target the next day.
singersigner wrote:you are, in fact, part of the scum faction. Dumb ass.
singersigner wrote:I disagree, and almost think that CKD is part of the mafia faction because he decided to make that decision on his own.
WTF? First you go and say that you're almost positive CKD is scum, to that you almost think he's scum, to he may be scum if the neighbor faction don't know the other alignment as well? Explain. Now.singersigner wrote:this theory only works if their “neighbor” faction doesn’t know each other’s alignment as well, along with CKD and I say this confidently knowing I’m town aligned, but also understanding that the rest of you have no way of knowing
Uhh... what? How am I lurking? I didn't post on sunday because I had church and I spent the day with family. However, I made 6 posts yesterday alone, so you really can't say I'm lurking, now can you? And I unvoted because espeonage had answered my questions.CooLDoG wrote:You seem to be lurking (like me...) And the it seems like the second one of the town votes espy you unvote...
What's the problem with me voting and unvoting? I vote based on my suspicions at the time, and if I see something really scummy, I'll probably switch my vote because of it.Don't like the many votes/unvotes going on with you.HRD wrote:Unvote, Vote: Looker
Where?zwetschenwasser wrote:ITT hd makes a Freudian slip.
But you say it'd be stupid for him to claim if he wasn't running a gambit?Espeonage wrote:I'm saying that they COULD be running a gambit and they COULD just be neighbours. But either way zwet is a better lynch infowise for the reasons I stated.
Town, Town, 33% chance of being Town.horrordude0215 wrote:So we have Esp, Looker, and SS for scum so far. One or two more and I'd say we have the entire team
I already asked you the question earlier which one of you do you prefer we lynch, to which you replied with an OMGUS.curiouskarmadog wrote:@ Demon, and who ever else feels so inclined to answer (the more the merrier, would like opinions and stances on this question)..also interested in seeing who blatantly ignores this post.
Get what? How to breadcrumb properly?SnakePlissken wrote:Sorry, this is my first game outside of Newbie on here. I'm still trying to get it.
I'm holding you to that. UNVOTE: VOTE: StefStef wrote:Prodded. My account has been inactive up till now so that's the reason for my inactivity. Will reread and post my thoughts as soon as possible.
1. He said it himself in the QT that he wanted to be open and honest about the "one shot vig ability." I'm not really sure why I'm the one getting all the blame for this...curiouskarmadog wrote:I also think we should be open (mostly) with the town about our ability. Meaning, I think we should tell them we have a one shot vig ability. this way, if one of us dies, and a mysterious "vigging" occurs, they know where it came from. I dont think we should mention (AT ALL) about the doc ability.
No you didn't. If you did you would have brought it up but you didn't which tells me you were content to let him fly under the radar. Why?vollkan wrote:I want to know his reasoning too. But that doesn't make him scum.NC wrote: I don't know about you but I kinda want to know why he's switched his vote twice and why he hasn't explained anything.
What on earth do you find scummy about his claim?[/quote]NC wrote: Read your own ISO. You said you'd claim. I don't like day 1 claims but fine. You said that what you have to tell us will help. Fine. I'm patiently waiting on you to explain yourself. But I'm NOT pushing for your lynch...at least not yet.
DH has made 3 posts, and you haven't even mentioned Jack until now. So that makes one person who could not reasonably want to lynch (DH) and then you jumping behind the consensus candidate (Esp) and the apparent rival (Jack).NC wrote: From my vantage point Jack, ESP and DH all look bad. Are they all scum? I'd like to think so but I doubt we are that lucky. But for the time being they all look like decent lynch candidates.
Now you get an additionalNC wrote: That said I'm on board for lynching all three but Jack is the one I'd like to see go the most.
Making fun of my name is a bit childish...CooLDoG wrote: @neo chain
What false information?Vezok wrote: unvote P
vote singersinger
You tried to force a lynch on CKD. By using false information.
We won it based on our performance in a scumteam in Advertising Mafia.Looker wrote: How can vollkan and curiouskarmadog both have "Best Mafia Performance"?
This is good posting.SS wrote: @vollkan...no I did not think of that before, because I'm dumb. In fact, your theory "b" sums up a lot of it, except after CKD was able to explain it in a manner I understood (sorry, I just wasn't getting everything that led up to it), when I accepted it. Honestly, I wish an apology for being so blind-sighted (regarding him claiming by himself) would actually be accepted on this site. But alas, that is not how people work here.
The guy made three quicks posts then went on VLA. He clearly had good reasons for not explaining himself immediatelyNC wrote: No you didn't. If you did you would have brought it up but you didn't which tells me you were content to let him fly under the radar. Why?
You're spouting bullshit.NC wrote: I never called his claim scummy, mostly 'cause he hadn't claimed yet but I did want him to explain himself better. Why do you find my wanting an explanation so scummy?
CKD then legitimately asked:NC wrote:CKD deserves an FOS until he explains himself better.
Your response:CKD wrote:curious as to what anything I have said is scummy.
If somebody asks you "What have I done that is scummy?" (after you'd clearly expressed the view that you considered them scummy, through your FOS) and you respond by pointing their claim and that you won't lynch them "yet", theNC wrote: Read your own ISO. You said you'd claim. I don't like day 1 claims but fine. You said that what you have to tell us will help. Fine. I'm patiently waiting on you to explain yourself. But I'm NOT pushing for your lynch...at least not yet.
So, two questions:Vollkan wrote: What on earth do you find scummy about his claim?
So, basically, it's my fault for expecting to be able to see some logical pathway in your suspicionNC wrote: From the time I posted to the time you posted there were 19 more posts. Maybe I play different than you but I don't auto read, my reads will change through the game based on new posts. I already mentioned ESP in my first post. Jack's 109 is especially stupid but 108 and 115 are full of fail as well. His no sell of 116 is scummy as fuck. I also find it incredibly odd you call ESP and Jack rivals when it looks a whole lot more like buddying. This sounds like scum/aggressive townie just trying to fling stuff at the wall and hopes it sticks.
ie. "candidate...and the apparent rival"Vollkan wrote: you jumping behind the consensus candidate (Esp) and the apparent rival (Jack).
Again, you are distorting what I am saying in the worst possible way.NC wrote: How the hell is me not thinking Jack was scummy in my first post as scum tell? Why do I want Jack lynched over ESP? I find Jack scummier. Watch this, why do YOU want ESP lynched over Jack? Perhaps you and Jack are scum buddies, yes?
to one in which Jack is scummy (with no explanation as to why), which is made worse, as I indicated, becasue suspecting him is utterly unreasonableCKD deserves an FOS until he explains himself berrter.
ESP ISO 3 is bad.
ESP ISO 9 is WIFOM
vote: DemonHybird
All the guy does is vote and then goes V/LA.
NC wrote: your massive chainsaw defense of Jack is noted.
Ok. So what do I call it when you defend Jack by atacking me?vollkan wrote:NC wrote: your massive chainsaw defense of Jack is noted.THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CHAINSAW DEFENCE!