Other than Poro and a single post on Ythan, who's scum-meta have I even mentioned? I've defended my own meta, I haven't attacked anyone over their own meta. And my 'attack' on Poro was merely to Null a town-meta read from someone.MOI wrote:Overall most of his ‘scum-hunting’ revolves around meta attacks, which he states in ISO 2 he dislikes (emphasis added)
Does the post below ring any bells?MagnaofIllusion wrote:You have stated you have a scum read on Sando in 511. At the time you made this vote Sando had 3 votes and Jack only 1. If you think they are both members of the scum team why push on the member with less votes? Why are you afraid to put Sando at L-1?
One reason I'm sticking with Jack now is that he's the common denominator between the Zajscum and Sandoscum theories. I'm curious about the timing of your hop off the wagon, though - why don't you want Jack at lynch-1?MagnaofIllusion wrote:QFT to farside’s 501. Scum have shown they have no compunctions self-hammering if caught. Anyone who puts Sando at L-1 and facilitates the end of the day before
1. farside returns and posts said content, and
2. Erg0 finishes his ‘catch-up’ posts and gives some actual reads that can be used to assess his slot
they deserve to be roasted over hot coals. If you feel Sando is obv-scum FOS him at this point.
This is something to remember if Jack does flip scum.You have stated you have a scum read on Sando in 511. At the time you made this vote Sando had 3 votes and Jack only 1. If you think they are both members of the scum team why push on the member with less votes? Why are you afraid to put Sando at L-1?
That’s really my point. You really haven’t done much attacking / questioning of anyone in the game. Except for your very recent post on Jack you really have only gone after vollkan and poro. Thus even though your haven’t talked much meta what you have talked about has constituted a large part of your scum-hunting.Sando wrote:Other than Poro and a single post on Ythan, who's scum-meta have I even mentioned? I've defended my own meta, I haven't attacked anyone over their own meta. And my 'attack' on Poro was merely to Null a town-meta read from someone.
Yes it does. That said I made that post so that you and farside could provide content. By the time you made your vote you had already made point 2 moot. The post was more directed at anyone not named Erg0 and farside.Erg0 wrote:Does the post below ring any bells?
Erg0 wrote:I'm curious about the timing of your hop off the wagon, though - why don't you want Jack at lynch-1?
These posts have similar themes so I lumped my response together on them.Sotty wrote:MOI's last post was all kinds of strange for me. He talks about Sando's scum meta in that one game where he doesn't ignore his partners but then goes on about how Sando could be scum. Feels off to me, like he wants it both ways. The unvote was weird too. I'm not getting it.
Point 2 was moot, but point 1 was still valid (farside hadn't returned) and there's an "and" between them. So if I'd voted Sando at that point then I still would have met your critera as someone who "deserveMagnaofIllusion wrote:Yes it does. That said I made that post so that you and farside could provide content. By the time you made your vote you had already made point 2 moot. The post was more directed at anyone not named Erg0 and farside.Erg0 wrote:Does the post below ring any bells?
MoI wrote:@Poro – why is Locke not listed at all on your ‘Who is in the game’ post at 455?
MoI wrote: My question is – why if you like the playerlist and overall game here the best why are you playing ‘in the background’? That makes no sense.
Here you say that most of my attacks revolve around meta, and you implicitly attack me because that doesn't gel with my 'hating meta', fair enough so far.MOI wrote:Overall most of his ‘scum-hunting’ revolves around meta attacks, which he states in ISO 2 he dislikes (emphasis added)
My response, saying that no, I'm not attacking anyone over meta really. I've responded to a claim to Poro is acting to town-meta by showing that he's also acting like scum-meta, ie null. And I've said that Ythan was playing well outside his town-meta, but too early to base anything off that.Sando wrote:Other than Poro and a single post on Ythan, who's scum-meta have I even mentioned? I've defended my own meta, I haven't attacked anyone over their own meta. And my 'attack' on Poro was merely to Null a town-meta read from someone.
Can you find me somewhere where I said that someone had to be scum because of how they were playing?
Firstly, your question, no, I only mentioned his scum-meta because someone else mentioned his town-meta. I have questioned Poro for non-meta reasons and that has nothing to do with others reads.MOI wrote:That’s really my point. You really haven’t done much attacking / questioning of anyone in the game. Except for your very recent post on Jack you really have only gone after vollkan and poro. Thus even though your haven’t talked much meta what you have talked about has constituted a large part of your scum-hunting.
Are you saying the only reason that you even have questioned Poro is not because you think he is scummy but because someone else had a Town read?
Zajnet wrote:I am stumped by my semblance of a reread. Nobody really jumps out to me as scum. Sando, Poro, and Jack all exhibit elements of scumminess, but nothing blatantly a scum-tell. I need to reread looking specifically for connections to Jason now, but a preliminary look over MOI's analysis seems to show that Sando is the scummiest because of voting patterns. However, I am not comfortable enough in that to vote for anyone, especially with Sando at L-2.
Where does this change come from?Zajnet wrote:Sorry for needed to be prodded (again).
I'm going to sound like lurking, wagoning scum, but that's OK.
UNVOTE: VOTE: Jack
There's nothing I could say that wouldn't be a direct quote from someone in the last page. Jack is scum.
Quoting this again.Jack wrote:This post is today, wednesday.Zajnet wrote:Whoops, got prodded. Time flies when I'm taking 16 hours of honors courses >.> speaking of which, gotta run to one of them. I'll post a catch-up post and some analysis later tonight.
He posted content in another game today.
On tuesday he had 8 posts, in 3 different games.
monday he posted once
sunday was the last time he'd posted
So why is he pretending like he's been busy with honors courses and hasn't had time to post? That excuse reads fake to me.
In trader mafia as town he had 93 posts--10% of the game. Here he has 14 posts--less than 4%. And they have been very content light.