Open 245 - Mini Love - Scum win!

[Mokujin_]

quadz08 (2): GarethByrd, Mokujin_
Tasky (1): WingsOWisdom
ZeroFang (2): quadz08, drmyshottyizsik
Zed (1): ZeroFang
drmyshottyizsik (1): andrew94,
andrew94 (1): Zed
WingsOWisdom (1): Tasky

Not voting (3): chesskid3, Battousai, tvellalott,

12 alive, 7 to lynch

Yet better than a few pointless Q's.

[quadz08]

Which you answered, without complaint.

[Mokujin_]

With no profit whatsoever.

[quadz08]

What, you expected your answers to provide an immediate start to the game? Come on, now.

[GarethByrd]

1. Lynch all lurkers? - No, burn all lurkers, slowly.
2. Lynch all liars? - I don't tend to go in for policy lynches - it all depends on the case.
3. RQS or RVS and why? - RVS: it amuses me.
4. Favorite previous game? - ...I don't have any. I'm in a newbie game as well at the moment, though.

I don't think quadz's questions were particularly suspicious. Sparking discussion is good for town, whether it is profitable or not. Here, the profit isn't in the question answers but in your response, Mokujin_.
Serious

Vote: Mokujin_.

[Battousai]

Vote: No Lynch

I prefer to have my vote out, but there isn't anything particularly scummy. Post more when I get time.

[drmyshottyizsik]

^^see a no lynch is the wrong way to go man
day one with this set up will be like the only day we can afford a quick lynch.
and if we lynch a goon today tomorow both lovers should claim and we take our best shot and if we miss we lynch the other one the next day, and worse case senario it's 2 to one lylo day 3

[Mokujin_]

Well...yes.

Quad's Q's only sparked discussion of his Q's usefulness. All in all, RQS only has any usefulness because there isn't a consensus on its validity. The questions themselves are irrelevant. And in the end, Day 1 will slump because of the RQS. RVS creates more content.

[andrew94]

what happened to your 'we must lynch drmyshotty'

[drmyshottyizsik]

^^god you're oppurtunistic

[Mr.Sandman]

don_johnson replaces chesskid3

[andrew94]

he stated at the start drmyshooty is an idiot, now he votes quadz, with apparently no explanation

[Mokujin_]

I dislike policy lynches, but love discussing them. My vote is explained. Read. My posts aren't cryptic.

[andrew94]

Well...yes.

Quad's Q's only sparked discussion of his Q's usefulness. All in all, RQS only has any usefulness because there isn't a consensus on its validity. The questions themselves are irrelevant. And in the end, Day 1 will slump because of the RQS. RVS creates more content.

u said your vote was serious. now your saying ur vote is an rvs?

[WingsOWisdom]

Quad's Q's only sparked discussion of his Q's usefulness. All in all, RQS only has any usefulness because there isn't a consensus on its validity. The questions themselves are irrelevant. And in the end, Day 1 will slump because of the RQS. RVS creates more content.

Unless you've got some examples, that's purely speculation. Day 1 will only slump if we let it slump.

u said your vote was serious. now your saying ur vote is an rvs?

I don't know where you're getting that impression. "RVS creates more content" != "My vote is random"

[quadz08]

Quad's Q's only sparked discussion of his Q's usefulness. All in all, RQS only has any usefulness because there isn't a consensus on its validity. The questions themselves are irrelevant. And in the end, Day 1 will slump because of the RQS. RVS creates more content.

Unless you've got some examples, that's purely speculation. Day 1 will only slump if we let it slump.

QFT. And in my (admittedly limited, though apparently less limited than yours) experience, RQS has worked better than RVS.

[ZeroFang]

So how about this. We stop talking about RVS/RQS and actually get on with the game. I like that idea.

[Mokujin_]

In my expirience, this has happened. I'm not going to quote games. You'll see for yourself, then.

[tvellalott]

Random is random, but when you have a significantly higher number of town you're probably going to hit one.
At least questions get people talking and discussing.
You're opposition to them is very telling Mokujin_.

[don_johnson]

howdy howdy howdy...

vote: battousai

no lynch is no good.

[Mokujin_]

Misrep. You're fallacitically implying that I'm trying to stop discussion, perhaps to help a wagon on me.

vote tvellalot

Discussion matters little if about nothing. The best result from RQS is discussion provoked by those opposing it.

You, for example, just became my best read.

[tvellalott]

Whoa. O_O; That was a ridiculously defensive response.
All mafia discussion starts out being about nothing, then someone does something stupid like voting for someone merely for questioning their motives.

[Mokujin_]

No, it wasn't. I agree with everything else.

[Battousai]

I'm not very active on the weekends, due to having a bad internet connection.


@Don- Really? I had no idea. Thanks for pointing that out...

@tvella- So, you are saying that voting Mokujin was stupid (from the line "someone does something stupid like voting for someone merely for questioning their motives")? If it is stupid, why is your vote still on him?


Also, drmyshottyizsik (is this supposed to be, "Doctor, my Shotty is sick"?) is obvscum.

unvote, vote: drmyshottyizsik

"Afford a quicklynch", plus planning out the rest of the game on the basis of hitting scum D1.

[Mokujin_]

Stop. Shotty is an idiot. You have to understand this. Or you'll mislynch.

We could policy kill him. Or have a vig do it.