Open 245 - Mini Love - Scum win!
-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
VOTE: WingsOWisdomWingsOWisdom wrote:VOTE: Tasky
Your avatar creeps me out.
for obvious reasons-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
VOTE: andrew94andrew94 wrote:
u said your vote was serious. now your saying ur vote is an rvs?Mokujin_ wrote:Well...yes.
Quad's Q's only sparked discussion of his Q's usefulness. All in all, RQS only has any usefulness because there isn't a consensus on its validity. The questions themselves are irrelevant. And in the end, Day 1 will slump because of the RQS. RVS creates more content.
for misrepresentationLast edited by Mr.Sandman on Sun Sep 12, 2010 8:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
wow...andrew94 wrote:
you are an active lurking retard that attempts to pick up on seemingly easy targets like me, if u actually LEARN SOME ENGLISH, you would see that above that statement mokujin voted quaz, and said that was a serious vote. therefore i was pointing out the irregulaties of that statement. you are a fail reader and have only contributed 3 posts and 1 is confirm, 1 is omgus and 1 is just randomly pointing at me. now, start reading moreTasky wrote:
VOTE: andrew94andrew94 wrote:
u said your vote was serious. now your saying ur vote is an rvs?Mokujin_ wrote:Well...yes.
Quad's Q's only sparked discussion of his Q's usefulness. All in all, RQS only has any usefulness because there isn't a consensus on its validity. The questions themselves are irrelevant. And in the end, Day 1 will slump because of the RQS. RVS creates more content.
for misrepresentation-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
for not having placed a single vote.
FoS: tvellalott
VOTE OR DIE!-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
ok, how about a serious vote now?tvellalott wrote:
VOTE: Tasky for having a creepy head.Tasky wrote:for not having placed a single vote.
FoS: tvellalott
VOTE OR DIE!-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
he can express an opinion. he doesn't have to know who is scum. but he has to see someone who is a little more scummy than the rest. he doesn't have to be sure. a gut vote will do in this stage of the game.Mokujin_ wrote:But there's only been about 100 posts! How can anyone ever vote seriously at this point?
if we go into the game with the attitude that there can be no serious vote now, this game is gonna end badly, we are never going to catch scum.
btw: your statement is quite contradictory:Mokujin_ wrote:No. Vote is serious. You hurt Day 1.FoS:Mokujin_-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
what are you talking about?andrew94 wrote:you started it rofl-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
you are scum. period.tvellalott wrote:the FAN-FUCKING-TASTIC possibilities
1) andrew94 is the doctor, no one counter-claims. He dies tonight.
2) andrew94 isn't the doctor, the real doctor counter-claims. We lynch andrew94. The real doctor dies tonight.
3) andrew94 isn't the doctor, the real doctor doesn't counter-claim. We don't lynch andrew94. He doesn't die tonight. We lynch him tomorrow.
4) andrew94 is the doctor, no one counter-claims. He doesn't die tonight. We lynch him tomorrow.
And so on.
Best case scenario: andrew94 isn't the real doctor, the real doctor DOESN'T counter claim.
Worst case scenario: andrew94 is the real doctor, we don't lynch him and lynch another townie instead, mafia don't kill him and we lynch him tomorrow.
For more information, see this youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK2tWVj6lXw
UNVOTE: VOTE: tvellalott-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
what's my price?andrew94 wrote:well tasky picked up on my case-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
this kind of speculation is extremely useless. you just want others to think you are doing something, you aren't. the last time I saw this kind of NK-WIFOM speculations they always came from scum-side.tvellalott wrote:
you are wrong. period.Tasky wrote:
you are scum. period.tvellalott wrote:the FAN-FUCKING-TASTIC possibilities
1) andrew94 is the doctor, no one counter-claims. He dies tonight.
2) andrew94 isn't the doctor, the real doctor counter-claims. We lynch andrew94. The real doctor dies tonight.
3) andrew94 isn't the doctor, the real doctor doesn't counter-claim. We don't lynch andrew94. He doesn't die tonight. We lynch him tomorrow.
4) andrew94 is the doctor, no one counter-claims. He doesn't die tonight. We lynch him tomorrow.
And so on.
Best case scenario: andrew94 isn't the real doctor, the real doctor DOESN'T counter claim.
Worst case scenario: andrew94 is the real doctor, we don't lynch him and lynch another townie instead, mafia don't kill him and we lynch him tomorrow.
For more information, see this youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK2tWVj6lXw
UNVOTE: VOTE: tvellalott
I think it's obvious the real doctor should counterclaim if he is out there. catching one scum is worth giving up the doc during the night.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
do you want a cookie for it?andrew94 wrote:well i pointed tvell out but as usual, u guys ignored me-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
this game needs more tvellalot votes-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
you serious? no taking this back later, you know?Zed wrote:I've been thinking about this for awhile, and while I don't agree with it, it seems to be agreed upon by everyone else that is the best thing to do.
cc doctor.
I think we should neither lynch Zed nor andrew at this point.
if we leave them both alive this night, scum won't be able to kill our doc (since they would expose the fakeclaimer), and the real doc would have one less possible target this night which increases the chances of a successful protect.
I think we should go and look for the other scumbags that are around.
if we kill one of them however there are two scenarios:
1. we lynch scum and lose the doc in the night => this is still favorable, but it doesn't make the most out of the situation, since we lose our protection starting from day 1
2. we lynch the doc, N1 someone get's killed and we lynch scum D2. => this is bad, as we lose a protection for the rest of the game have to waste another lynch on the scum. two lynches on doc+scum isn't good for town.
therefore we want to force scum to kill the real doc sooner or later.
andrew: you sure you are claiming cop, last time I'll ask: if you are town, take back your claim. it's the worst thing a townie could do. (well, technically it's already to late, but late is better than never)
only exception: if andrew or zed should be someones lover, the lover should claim that, since doctor isn't a lover.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
not necessarily.Mokujin_ wrote:Personally, I'm pretty sure that the CCer is Town. I mean, CCing just isn't a good move for scum here on Day 1. Scum doesn't do 1 for 1 trades.
claiming doc out of nowhere isn't a good move either
and besides there is still the WIFOM possibility that Zed knows we suspect andrew more than him and tried to pull of the gambit.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
I don't agree. if neither of them dies, we have the advantage of one night protection today. all things being equal, it's better to have a chance of preventing a NK, isn't it?ZeroFang wrote:I'm inclined to believe the CC. Andrew has been really scummy, and the scum usually won't risk a 1-1 ration of scum to PRs. Due to there being a claim and a counterclaim, it's very likely that one is scum and one is a doctor. Either way, they both die, the scum are short a member, and we're short a doctor. It's not the best tradeoff but it's already happened, so we might as well make the most of it.
VOTE: andrew94
Leaving the scum to choose is a bad idea. You should never leave scum with decisions. It allows them to choose what will work best with their current plans. The death of both is inevitable and we don't need to eat WIFOM cake in the event that neither of them die. It's much safer and better for the town to lynch the counter-claimed doctor.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
andrew, so you stay with your doc claim?
why aren't you voting for Zed then?
I mean. if you are the real doc, you would know he is scum, right?-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
I want andrew's replacement to do talk before we lynch.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
oh, right...
back to:
VOTE: tvellalot-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
well... we need to start somewhere, don't we?tvellalott wrote:
Here I was thinking we could be friends today.Tasky wrote:oh, right...
back to:
VOTE: tvellalot
Come on Tasky, this tunnel is ridiculous.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
hmmm... I really can't get a good read on this game.
for now I'll follow ZeroFang's case:
UNVOTE: VOTE: quadz-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
oh, and a question:
Zero, what do you mean by:
"I would guess town on statistics alone, which of course means absolutely nothing"-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
probably.drmyshottyizsik wrote:
so if i vote for some one and it gets more votes than this wagon will you switch again?Tasky wrote:hmmm... I really can't get a good read on this game.
for now I'll follow ZeroFang's case:
UNVOTE: VOTE: quadz-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
!drmyshottyizsik wrote:Tasky wrote:
probably.drmyshottyizsik wrote:
so if i vote for some one and it gets more votes than this wagon will you switch again?Tasky wrote:hmmm... I really can't get a good read on this game.
for now I'll follow ZeroFang's case:
UNVOTE: VOTE: quadz
???????????????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
laziness.Wisteria wrote:
Why not do something about it?Tasky wrote:yaawn. this game is boring...-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
yeeeeee. quote pyramid for the win.drmyshottyizsik wrote:
either you are dumb or you just admitted to being oppertunistic scumTasky wrote:
!drmyshottyizsik wrote:Tasky wrote:
probably.drmyshottyizsik wrote: so if i vote for some one and it gets more votes than this wagon will you switch again?
???????????????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am not scum. I am not dumb. I am just lazy and nothing is happening in this game.
WHY DID I JUST ADMIT BEING OPPORTUNISTIC SCUM?
ACTUALLY I THINK IT'S THIS GUY BEING OPPORTUNISTIC SCUM HERE:
yeah. I wanna build wagons. that's cool.quadz08 wrote:I'm with shotty on this one. VOTE: Tasky
Are you serious? You're just gonna switch to whoever's got the largest wagon? Super-town play, there.
and it does catch scum. maybe.
as soon as I get motivated again, I'll do something serious. for now I don't feel like it.
BUT, my vote on you sit's just fine for now-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
hmmm... WAAAAAIT... we are NOT quicklynching.
I have to think this over.
I am terribly furious at andrew for how he screwed us over with that stupid doc-claim.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
huh? do you mean "if you play dumb like that I promise I will keep my vote for a bit"?drmyshottyizsik wrote:@tasky- you are playing dumb like that I promise. I will keep my vote for a bit, but
Do you think I am playing dumb? Is [playing dumb] = [scummy]?
lol.Wisteria wrote:
Hey, scumbag. Already regretting that bus?Tasky wrote:hmmm... WAAAAAIT... we are NOT quicklynching.
I have to think this over.
I am terribly furious at andrew for how he screwed us over with that stupid doc-claim.
No panic, I just don't want to quicklynch. There is still so much to be said.Wisteria wrote:By my count, quadz08 is only at L-2. Why the panic, Tasky? Were you not complaining earlier that this game was boring?
To the few of you who were complaining about how andrew94 screwed up this game: He did not totally ruin it. His fake claim was poor play, but he managed to give me a few strong town reads out of that ordeal. If you are not getting a grip on things, I suggest rereading Day 1.
Game's getting interesting, that's a good thing.
Well, how do you call a play which causes a mislynch and a killed doc? For me it's just terrible. Would you mind share that few strong town reads with us?
explain please. I don't understand what you mean.don_johnson wrote:hm. if we're correct, we've netted ourselves a pair of masons to counteract andrew's poisonous play.
_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_
what exactly don't you like? Is [you not liking it] = [scummy]?Nexus wrote: I don't like Tasky's whole attitude, and he doesn't really seem that fussed about things.
what's so ridiculously suspicious about Tvell? is [just not very good] scummier than [ridiculously suspicious]?Nexus wrote: Tvell was ridiculously suspicious in the last day, and quadz is just not very good.
would you hammer tvell if he were at L-1?
why do you respect it? Do you think quadz is scum, yes or no? If yes, why aren't you hammering?Nexus wrote: I will respect Tasky's request not to quicklynch yet, but this is me declaring an intention to vote quadz at some point soon.
_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_
post 353. If someone can tell me what I am about to say about that post, he wins a cookie.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
why aren't you telling them now?Wisteria wrote:Happy birthday, andrew94!
What is there to say? We cannot draw associative tells until quadz08 and I flip. I will share my reads in twilight; there is a couple of things I am waiting on for the moment.Tasky wrote:No panic, I just don't want to quicklynch. There is still so much to be said.
if you wait for twilight, you risk being cut short by the mod starting night.
if you are waiting for something for the moment, doesn't that mean that you too don't want a quicklynch?
PS: I think scum has a winning strategy at this point even if quadz flips scum. so we might as well give up.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
lol. no. I'm not telling scum how to win.Wisteria wrote:
Out with it. Right here. Right now. Not in your scum QuickTopic.Tasky wrote:PS: I think scum has a winning strategy at this point even if quadz flips scum. so we might as well give up.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
If I haven't missed anything, the strategy can't be broken. But I'll recheck everything as soon as I have some time.Wisteria wrote:
What, is it a strategy that town cannot break?Tasky wrote:
lol. no. I'm not telling scum how to win.Wisteria wrote:
Out with it. Right here. Right now. Not in your scum QuickTopic.Tasky wrote:PS: I think scum has a winning strategy at this point even if quadz flips scum. so we might as well give up.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
there is no breaking strategy. That was supposed to be a scum-trap which I learned from a great player.
it was unlucky, Wisteria was the last person I'd have wanted to answer on it. you couldn't know of course, I would have done the same thing as you, but you neutralized my play.
I'm sorry if I created confusion.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
lol. you are so scum.quadz08 wrote:
Yeah, that's what I was referring to. Do you plan on continuing that strategy the whole game? Simply mindlessly hopping on wagons? Because that's anti-town, at the very best. I like my vote where it is.Tasky wrote:you mean this?
if that's it, well I was serious about wagoning until something happens. something has happened today. today we lynch you, then tomorrow I will bandwagon again until scum slips up again.
I never said I wouldmindlesslyhop on wagons.
aren't you going for the "anti-townish" lynch here instead of looking for real scum?-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
hopping on the largest wagon is NOT "mindless" if it's done for a good reason. trust me, it DOES catch scum.quadz08 wrote:No, you did. You said you would probably hop on the largest current wagon. That says "mindless" to me.
And no, I'm not. I said "anti-town at best." Very different than just plain anti-town.
also, "anti-town at best" is also very different from scummy.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
yeah. lol.ZeroFang wrote:
You basically just said mindless wagon hopping isn't mindless if it's not mindless wagon hopping.Tasky wrote:hopping on the largest wagon is NOT "mindless" if it's done for a good reason.
Real Life.Wisteria wrote:
Link, now, as well as an explanation why you did not paste this link as evidence as soon as you brought this up.Tasky wrote:there is no breaking strategy. That was supposed to be a scum-trap which I learned from a great player.
if we lynch you and you flip scum, the other lover pair will become masons.Additionally:
This is bothering me. This is the second time you have referred to quadz08 and I as a "mason pair." Why do you sound so certain of our innocence?don_johnson wrote:if the other lover pair is okay not being revealed, lynching outside of quadz/wisteria runs the risk of exposing them. exposing means town loses potential masons for tomorrow. ugh.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
so you are town?quadz08 wrote:*facepalm*
Dammit, man. You couldn't even let any damn discussion go on about my perfectly valid, good idea? Ugh.
I still say look at Tasky; I'll try to get a re-read/brief ISOs before night falls, but I can't guarantee anything.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
lovers claim. NOW. we lynch the Treacherous Lover.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
noooo wait. I just thought this over.
if we lynch the Treacherous Lover we lose:
7=3(VT),2(scum),1-1(loverpair)
day lynch lovers -> 3,2
nightkill -> 2,2 LOSE
we have to go for the goons:
7=3(VT),2(scum),1-1(loverpair)
day lynch goon -> 3,1,1-1
nightkill:
if lovers -> 3,1 standard endgame setup
if townie -> 2,1,1-1
day lynch goon -> 2,1-1
nightkill:
if lovers -> 2,0 WIN
if townie -> 1,1-1
lynch lovers -> 1,0 WIN
but lover should still out themselves, since scum already know them and there is no reason to risk lynching them at this point.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
u don't get it, do you? SCUM ALREADY KNOWS THE LOVER PAIR.don_johnson wrote:Claiming = bad. R u afraid to name suspects? Much more info comes from letting scum play without a claim...
no. lovers claim. period.Sevei wrote:Also, should we vote on whether the lovers claim or not?
there is NO REASON to withhold that information as scum already has it.
what reason would you possibly have to delay the claim?Consigliere wrote:A claim is in order...but is it necessary RIGHT NOW? So long as we don't rush headlong into things, a little posturing can go a long way.
is odd=scummy? if yes, why? if no, why bother stating it?That was an odd opening of the day Tasky...Logic machine runnin' overtime there fella?
I was thinking about this game at night, yes. so what?
no. wait. it is reasonable to assume scum believed andrew's claim until the CC, since they knew he wasn't one of them and it is such a totally stupid move for a townie to claim doc.Sevei wrote:Scum knew Andrew wasn't scum, so by pushing for a CC, they knew for sure who the real doctor was and that they could get a mislynch in the bargain.
why aren't you digging, then?Sevei wrote:ANYWAY. I think that's one of the best places to dig for scum.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
am I getting this right?don_johnson wrote:No no no no no.
I wasn't expecting this, but I wasn't claiming because I wanted to set where "suspicions" were going...
Nexus is scum. Sevei has to be goon.
vote: Sevei
Nex had a good showing(though brief) in the qt two nights ago. This is fucked up.
are you claiming to be Nexus' lover?
Nexus, claim NOW, who is your lover?-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
actually we should be happy about the situation.
if scum hadn't claimed lover, we would have 3 townies and 2 goons left to look at, that's a hitting chance of 2/5=40%. Because of the lover claim, we KNOW one of Sevei and don_johnson is goon, and that's a hitting percentage of 50%.
scum just increased our odds of winning.
still, we should be careful.
so here are some rules to follow:
1. DO NOT VOTE, put FoS's if you want, but voting just gives scum the opportunity to quickhammer.
2. DO NOT LISTEN to anything Nexus is saying. He is confirmed scum and trying to analyze his words is just pointless WIFOM. just pretend it wasn't there.
I have to reread a bit.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
UNVOTEdrmyshottyizsik wrote:Vote sevie
He is our goon, I am sure of it now.
Nexus would not tell the truth.NOW
we are not giving scum chance to quickhammer!
and IGNORE NEXUS' POSTS. this is just WIFOM.
if you have some other reason for voting sevie, fine, say so and FoS him. but if you are voting him just because Nexus' statement, you should stop.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
good game, scum.
whoever that townie was, Consigliere or drmyshottyizsik who voted without thinking in LyLo, you shall feel deeply sorry and stupid now.
andrew, who you ruined us, you shall feel even more stupid and sorry, I probably won't join any game with you in the future
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.