First off, my eyes started glazing over toward the end of this, so I haven't really digested the last page or two. However, I did see this and I really don't get it.
Katsuki wrote:Can you please quit stalling the game by bringing up arguments that occured ages ago? Thanks.
@Jesse: I didn't see the second part of your post, but for antihero, it is a combination of gut and stuff like the above that makes me think he is scum. He has clearly shown a blatant laziness in terms of reading.
Only thing I have to add is that warrior is obvtown and you guys would be best following him. Proxy-vote to warrior until I am able to get consistent access/time to analyze.
Apologies about the flow of this, but I was just making notes as I went through. I'm also pretty tired, so I hope it all makes sense to you.
This is an odd defence of Katsuki. Only his third post at the time.
warriormode wrote:Scott Brosius wrote:Muthaa wrote:@Katsuki: Yes I have, I was just wondering if you're asking me to participate in random shit.
Just wondering: how familiar are you with each other?
Around half of this game participated in this exact setup last time. We all ended up dead.
Katsuki's push on Muthaa seems forced and really doesn't have merit.
Unvote
Vote: Katsuki
I think he's just trying to get the game moving along a bit.
This one is really weird. Not only did he miss where Jesse explained it, I don't really see why it's voteworthy even if Kastsuki was wrong.
Antihero wrote:Scott Brosius wrote:And what do you think that means?
I thought it was because he might be scum, and casting a vote would cause too much cognitive dissonance for him. But since there are better things to persue, like Katsuki and SSS's defense of it.
Katsuki wrote:@Scott: Oh are you protecting muthaa's lack of wanting to place a vote?
Jesse at least explained why they didn't
, muthaa has yet to.
Really? And where did he do this?
UNVOTE: nopointinactingup
VOTE: Katsuki
SSS wrote:Nothing was happening, so people wanted to start a wagon to get discussion going. I'm going to:
unvote, vote:antihero
why does it matter whether or not jesse votes?
Chainsaw defense, much? What I say to warrant a vote?
DMSIS wrote:no because if he truely were claiming scumz he would be mod killed
any way there's nothing here against gandalf, but no point you are looking really scum, and ultra super dumb.
unvote
vote nopoint
if you aren't scum(which it's looking like you are), this would almost be a kill a dumb doctor who would just protect scum and confuse the town policy lynch
Ah, f$#%, here we go again.
Based on what he said here, I don't get why he voted Katsuki over SSS.
I thought the chain of posts starting
here was a little off.
warriormode doesn't look that good there.
Phaen in post 98 wrote:Gandalf is utterly unreadable to me. Claiming scum is kind of a null-tell but at least he's generating discussion with his antics.
Muthaa is suspicious to me, the bandwagon was useful to get us talking a bit more and he seemed against it.
@Muthaa - Please clarify how you feel about bandwagons in general, are they usually good or usually bad or what?
unvote; vote: JesseSheffield
my vote belongs here again. I don't like Jesse's reason for not voting. Sure, having a reason to vote is good. But, sitting there not voting and saying he isn't going to randomly vote will not cut it. I can't imagine he has NO opinion on ANY player.
@Jesse - Has anyone done anything scummy in this game so far? Who do you suspect the most?
Also I'm not familiar with the term scumseeking. I have a vague idea, but could you explain more?
Page 4 and he's talking about not getting reads? I don't like how he's acting like the game is so advanced at this stage. Most of the posts so far have been nonsense.
Since this is an open game, I'm assuming that the votecount on Jesse here should be two, correct?
crywolf20084 in post 109 wrote:Vote Count: Day 1
7 to lynch; 6 to no lynch.
Katsuki: (3)
Muthaa, Scott Brosius, Antihero
Antihero: (2)
warriormode, smashbro
nopointinactingup: (2)
drmyshottyizsik, animorpherv1
JesseSheffield: (1)
Phaen, nopointinactingup
drmyshottyizsik: (1)
Gandalf
Gandalf: (1)
Katsuki
Once again, any mistakes, let me know. etc etc
Later tonight, or tomorrow morning I will be doing a prod check.
Edit was to appease ani w/ the spelling of his name.
Antihero's
vote on Jesse is weak. It seems that he didn't like how the Jesse wagon was dying off so he tried to kickstart it again.
warriormode wrote:animorpherv1 wrote:This game makes my head hurt. At least it isn't the most stupid.
In all seriousness, gandalf didn't claim scum, nopoint is just tyring to make it seem like that.
vote nopoint
This is his only post relevant to this game and its a pretty crappy one due to the accuracy of his point.
Unvote, Vote: animorpherv1
Really? With all that's starting to happen, you pick on a lurker/flaker? This seems like a copout and it's magnified by your other contributions.
Katsuki's bemoaning of the Jesse wagon doesn't feel right. He had been voting Jesse previously and
now he's saying that the wagon looks bad.
I don't get this.
Scott Brosius wrote:warriormode wrote:
Shotty- i got scum vibes from him for trying to make Gandalf change his vote off of him and onto one of the major wagons. didn't like that.
Actually, I think it's more telling that Gandalf obeyed this without question.
Unvote
Vote:gandalf5166
All in all, I don't really understand the Mufaa wagon. He's been kind of lurky, but why him over my predecessor or warriormode or even Shotty?
From my read, I'm leaning scum on warriormode and Antihero, warriormode sticks out the most to me.
VOTE: warriormode