Open 249: Mayo Clinic **Game Over!**

gandalf5166 · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:24 pm

I can hammer before deadline, someone put him back at L1.

Katsuki · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:29 pm

Or you can put him at L1, and let whoever comes on next hammer.

Don't be difficult. You and shotty's reluctance to vote AT DEADLINE is not making me happy.

Katsuki · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:30 pm

Scott, you can also stop sitting there while making noise and doing nothing.

HackerHuck · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:04 pm

UNVOTE: warriordude
VOTE: Shotty

Katsuki · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:12 pm

Actually, I take back my statement. Scott's statement wasn't entirely noise.

JesseSheffield · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:25 pm

drmyshottyizsik wrote:
unvote

I need to ISO him, I really want to be sure about this

Why would you vote him if you weren't sure in the first place? What's changed your mind so drastically right before deadline that you don't think that's where your vote should be anymore?

Katsuki · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:26 pm

hint hint scum wanting no lynch?

Or just standard shotty play.

JesseSheffield · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:51 pm

I really don't think that's the case. If shotty were scum wanting no lynch he would've made a much bigger deal about it I feel like. If anything it's more like scum trying to slip out of a lynch for some reason, what reason that would be...who knows.

Katsuki · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:52 pm

Oh?

Why would he have made a big deal about it? That excuse he gave for unvoting seemed as much an excuse to slip off and unvote as any. Muthaa not coming in is bad though.

JesseSheffield · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:18 pm

I just doubt that the reason would be a no lynch when there were so many players interested in hammering. I think he would've figured that if he wanted a no lynch he'd actually have to put some effort in. Of course that's all WIFOM but that's what I think.

Katsuki · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:19 pm

Well, we have approx. 10hrs until deadline.

Phaen · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:04 pm

He'd have to be hopelessly optimistic to hope for No Lynch. He doesn't want his name on the final vote count for some reason.

HackerHuck · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:29 pm

JesseSheffield wrote:I just doubt that the reason would be a no lynch when there were so many players interested in hammering.

You'd think so, but no one really jumped on with a vote to put him back to L-1.

Phaen wrote:He'd have to be hopelessly optimistic to hope for No Lynch. He doesn't want his name on the final vote count for some reason.

I can't really think of a pro-town reason for that, but no one else was willing to push for a late Shotty wagon. I can understand that, since I'd rather not risk the no-lynch myself.

UNVOTE: Shotty
VOTE: Muthaa

That should be L-1 again.

Katsuki · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:32 pm

Something tells me I've been up too late. I never noticed that you voted shotty instead of muthaa with your last post...

gandalf5166 · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:49 am

unvote, vote muthaa

Mark my words, he'll flip town. And I didnt vote earlier and let Huck hammer because unlike him, I could be on at deadline.

crywolf20084 · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:00 am

Vote Count: End Of Day 1

LYNCH

Muthaa: (7)

smashbro, JesseSheffield, warriormode, Katsuki, Phaen, HackerHuck, gandalf

Katsuki: (3)

Antihero, nopointinactingup

Gandalf: (1)

Scott Brosius

Muthaa was...

the

Serial Killer

.

The deadline for the night is in 72 hours from this post. I only randomize the compulsory roles if you happen to miss your action.

crywolf20084 · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Fri Sep 24, 2010 3:02 am

The sun rises upon three dead bodies. Nopoint, gandalf, and Shotty.

All three were doctors.

8 live.

Vote Count Day 2

5 to lynch.

Not Voting:

Antihero
Scott Brosius
Warriormode
Katsuki
JesseSheffeild
Smashbro_of_the_SSS
Phaen
HackerHuck

Day 2 Starts Now.

Phaen · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:55 am

Ok, I'll admit I'm lost about how to interpret all this. Can we get a few words from the folks more familiar with the setup?

2/3 of the people I suspect (shotty and gandalf, mainly because it seems like scum

would

think Muthaa was innocent since he wasn't on their team) died last night and came up as doctors so I'm not feeling all too confident about my reads right now -_-

I'm glad both the vigs are still alive. Is it advisable for us to massclaim with 2 vigs, 3 scum, and only 3 doctors? It means the scum will surely kill a doctor tonight and if we mislynch or misvig another doctor or two tonight the vigs wont have any protection on the 3rd night. However, massclaiming will probably protect the vigs from death tonight and (if we're accurate about hitting scum) on the 3rd night too. Is it worth it?

Scott Brosius · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:56 am

Yeah we should mass-claim.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:27 am

[quote="Phaen"]Ok, I'll admit I'm lost about how to interpret all this. Can we get a few words from the folks more familiar with the setup?

/quote]

What exactly are you lost about? We have 3 doctors 2 vigs and 3 scum left.

JesseSheffield · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:50 am

Hoooly crap yeah I agree with both of you that a massclaim is pretty necessary.

Katsuki · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:57 am

LOL that was a good night, the VI trio is gone (jk guys).

That aside, we are in a good position. SK gone as well as main active lurkers. I will look over everything tonight if I have time, and hopefully get some analysis data up.

P-EDIT: HOLD THE MASSCLAIM UNTIL I GET HERE. I WANT TO GET MY ANALYSIS OFF BEFORE ANY CLAIMING OCCURS.

HackerHuck · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:15 am

Wow, pretty hard to believe that with six doctors we weren't able to protect any of the three townies that died last night. Good news is no vig deaths, but I was really surprised that all three of those slots flipped town.

This is one case where I think that a massclaim is a really good idea. Given what happened yesterday, Katsuki should go first. Please claim when you post your analysis.

Anyone claiming vig needs to claim their target, but I don't think that the docs need to.

Phaen · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:29 am

Scott Brosius wrote:What exactly are you lost about? We have 3 doctors 2 vigs and 3 scum left.

I'm well aware of which roles are remaining. I am following the game. I'm just unsure concerning whether to massclaim and concerning my reads on people.

Sorry, the sentence order/word choice of my post might have been confusing.

Katsuki · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:30 am

Reasons for me first. I do not mind claiming, but I am not claiming just because you say "you first". Also, I'm in class so analysis is out of the question (posts will be colorful

).

Hacker's statement bothers me. Would you like to provide any reasoning as to why you are distraught over the lack of doc protection on questionable players at best?
If anything, those 3 dying N1 was a good thing, as it removes a ton of distractions for today's lynch. Considering that 2 of those were vig shots, the lack of doc protection was a GOOD thing.

Hacker: Your scum suspects please.