@RedCoyote
: Here's my summation of what you said about Hinduragi in that post:-You agreed with him that not reading the thread is a nulltell,
-You called him on misreading Enigma's sarcasm,
-You don't like Sociopath's vote on Hindu,
-He is fourth on your townlist.
Now I have read your notes, and you've gone back and explained how you arrived at your townread by making parallels with other stuff you said, but my original point still stands - your original read on Hindu seemed to come out of the blue.
But now this makes your vote on him doubly puzzling. Sure he hasn't been posting much, and it was a case of "Sure, I've got a free vote, whatever". It's like you didn't have any opinions on Hindu at all.
Also, as I pointed out, there were cases floating about. Why was Doombunny on the backburner and not Hindu, or anyone else? You seem to be the player who, like me, likes to put a lot of thought into his voting, but this Hindu business rubs me the wrong way. And this is not the first time Doombunny has been out of your notice, you did leave him off your first scumscale...
I can't put it better than Hinduragi already did:
Hmmmmmmm.Hinduragi 420 wrote:Pray tell, what did Doombunny do that gives him the pleasure of being on your backburner?
And, my reaction was different to yours, wrt the dropped message. I'm looking for scum motivation; you were looking for a reaction from Zhero.
@SpyreX
: The problem I have is that you're painting this mess as a failed scum gambit, and that Calc needs to claim to clear it up. It's clear that the Calc hydra view the move as a mistake, and I don't see how knowing the details will help the town conclude anything about their alignment. I'm not convinced it's a scum gambit, but I'm not convinced the other way either. The best way to clear this up is to talk about other things
, rather than treading over the same ground.Because I believe Doombunny is scum, maybe with RedCoyote, and I don't think Doombunny was/is bussing Sociopath. That crosses SocioPath off the "Warsaw Pact" list, but doesn't clear him from being the SK.Faraday 413 wrote:... I don't know why [Percy] doesn't think Socio can be scum? Any reason apart from the message thing?
Now Doombunny is getting really condescending, saying the problem is with my interpretation and there is a little bit of "you are scum for voting me" tone creeping into this post, and I'm not a fan. Where did I get the idea you're voting Socio for lurking? Oh yeah, when you say things like this in the post where you vote for him:
If that's not a "You are scum because you are a lurker" case, then I don't know what is. Quibble over definitions if you like, but you made the determination that Socio was the lurkiest of the lurkers, and he was scummy in his lurking.Doombunny9 223 wrote:Hey Socio... You going to you know? Actually contribute something? Out of ten posts (Whereas most people have over double that and the only people with less posts are Percy and Spyre (Not counting Papa since he dropped off the face of the Earth)) only one was actually good (good defined as participating in discussion etc. etc.): #5. The rest just mainly being fluff. Also, out of the 3 posts he made in Defcon 3, two vere votes/votechanges with nothing more than a 3 or 4 word explanation (If I even want to call it that). Finally, he kept his RV on Spyre for an exceedingly long amount of time. guys, I think we have a scum here.
But, you've been inconsistent in your lurkerhunting, as I've pointed out, which is how I sort the town lurkerhunters from the scum lurkerhunters.
Your unvote to test the waters of a Calcifer lynch, then putting it
back on Sociopath
when SpyreX starts to get votes is awesome. The unvote shows just how little you actually believe in your Socio vote, also how you're opportunist scum, and revoting Sociopath is the move of a cowardly toothless paper baby tiger.
