I certainly don't like this reaction, and, frankly, I feel as though at this point Calcifer is doing whatever he can to shed votes off him and turn attention away from him. If I was in Calcifer's position, I would be annoyed by Spyrex's advances, but I have to think that I wouldn't let myself get this much out of sync. Calcifer is playing extremely reactionary, coupled with his earlier information broking, means I have to think something sinister is at play.Calcifer 416 wrote:I won't let you get away with this. NOT BY A LONG SHOT.
Vote: SpyreX
---
This is a prime example of why I'm voting you. Could you be any less relevant to the game? I understand catching up, you know, and I sympathize with that. But what is this? It's like some random, forced comment on something. It's a stark contrast to the Hinduragi of old.Hindu 420 wrote:Spyre, don't nuke-threat anyone in here like that. It will bring up ALOT of wifom.
VV brought more substance to the game, I think (although I'm changing my opinion here again ). However, I unvoted him before the drop and before all these shenanigans with Spyrex. I mentioned "like Enigma did" because I felt that our reasons for dropping the vote were probably very similar.Hindu 420 wrote:What? You backed off Calcifer because he's clarifying something? I didn't see much clarification because the entire vote is still not explained. Why mention the "like Enigma did" part?
Prove me wrong. It's a judgment call on my part. Maybe you're busy, maybe you're letting Spyrex and Calcifer tear each other apart. Who's to say?Hindu 420 wrote:Yup, "active lurking" vote. Nice one. Let's just ignore the fact that I may actually have stuff to do.
It is a fact, regardless, that this a completely different Hindu than the one that was playing D1. I will continue fight you and Percy on that point.
Posted. Responded to his attackers. Continued to attack. All good things.Hindu 420 wrote:Pray tell, what did Doombunny do that gives him the pleasure of being on your backburner?
---
As comical as this may be, this reads nothing but tunnelled to me. For Spyrex to press you on having a night result that was, at one point, good enough to vote someone, and only later, when called out on it, wasn't, is absolutely logical play. For him to press you as hard as he is is a debatable move, but it tells me that he's serious. I think he smells something, and I, for one, don't blame him.Calcifer 421 wrote:Easy rectification would be!
Spy: OKAY CALCIFER FESS UP!
Calc: NO! NO NO NO NO NO!!
Spy: Okay! Sheesh! I stop now and prevent further damage!
NOT:
Spy: OKAY CALCIFER FESS UP!
Calc: NOO!!
Spy: FUCK YOUU WITH A GODAMN NUKE.
---
I still don't quite understand what expectations you're expecting me to adhere to, but I'm getting a vibe that you have some sort of perfectionist standard that you're applying directly to my reads on the game. I try to be as precise as possible with my reads, but mafia is very much an imperfect science. I gave Hindu a modest town read based on the things I've already told you. It was a D1 read with some 10 pages into the game. There have been serious, undeniable differences in his play since then.Percy 425 wrote:but my original point still stands - your original read on Hindu seemed to come out of the blue.
The latter was an error in my typing. I had typed nearly that entire post up in one sitting, so that was just an oversight (I'm sure there are plenty more within that post). Doombunny has been making stuff happen, Hindu has been letting stuff happen. That's significant. I agree that we probably are both very careful with our votes, but perhaps you don't put as much stock in playstyle shifts as I do. I sense a strong change in Hindu's play.Percy 425 wrote:Why was Doombunny on the backburner and not Hindu, or anyone else? You seem to be the player who, like me, likes to put a lot of thought into his voting, but this Hindu business rubs me the wrong way. And this is not the first time Doombunny has been out of your notice, you did leave him off your first scumscale...
Moreover, this is not some sort of staic position. Hindu and Doombunny can both still prove me very much wrong. I acknowledge your case against Doombunny as rational and sincere; I don't understand why you're not giving me the same courtesy.
---
This.Spyrex 447 wrote:Voting for percy after targetting him IS THE SAME THING WE JUST WENT THROUGH. If its a damn investigation say so. If not DONT DO WHAT JOHNNY DONT DOES.
It's your turn Enigma. Since it's impossible for a town power role to use information they may or may not have gathered at night and build