MagnaofIllusion wrote:This combined with the next quoted part is quite a disproportionate reaction. The point I was making is this – you got a pretty free ride Day 1 due to vezok’s lyncher play and your claim as Claire. Now that Jack, arguably THE main character of the show, has flipped scum you get no flavor based protect as Claire.
I beg to differ here. The game could've been over for me not five pages into D1 because people were following a questionable claim by a known VI. Not what I would call a free ride exactly. I had to claim my name in order to prove vezo's claim wrong. But I never considered myself to be unlynchable on D1 because I had claimed the name Claire. On the contrary, people were debating whether the lynchee could still be scum. But I weren't getting a lot of suspicion later on D1 although other "Unlynchables" like vezo or BC still were. I wonder why that is?
Ademisk wrote:@Dekes: Well the thing, your vote on me today is "for the same reasons as yesterday". Your reasons yesterday was me being suspicious of the unlynchables. Therefore your point about having more info to base your vote on is moot.
That was one of the reasons. The others were your distancing from the lynch candidates and your dubious claim (not the name, but the circumstances surrounding it).
If you want a D2 update why I think you're scum, here we go.
It starts off with your catch-up post, which - for my taste - contained just a tad too many filler questions to make you look like a good, curious townie.
That post ends with a case against chesskid and a vote on him.
So, two pages into D2 in your first post you vote the person that you claim to be one of your top town reads D1. What happened to your supsects on D1: BC, dram, vezo and even AGar whom you made a case against late on D1?
Incidentally - and here it gets interesting -, besides AGar and yourself (and vezo's obligatory vote on me), chesskid was the only one with a vote on at that time. And he had the weaker position in that debate with AGar (BC, for example, sided with AGar).
Sure as hell could be looked at as you sacrificing your top town read (or even your scumbuddy, who knows?) to start an early counterwagon with all the suspicion you're still facing.
Ademisk wrote:wth, you're playing like crap today. On D1 you were near the top of my towny list along with MoI. Now you are just not even trying. With posts like these you are not doing yourself any favors, and make me think more my vote is accurate.
This is irritating me. Feels like you weren't even that suspicious when you voted him back then (which would support the counterwagon theory) and now you're trying to strenghten your original vote.
Couple that with your continued vagueness about your knowledge of jenni's role:
Ademisk wrote:If chess thinks the softclaim was BP and you (MoI) do not, what else could it be (rhetorical)?
Lol, if you know her role why do you want other people to guess? The fact that you added rhetorical makes it even worse.
Dram's and BC's behaviour surrounding their softclaim is unsatisfactory indeed. But it's fine for know, the longer they are alive the more questionable their claim becomes (inb4 WIFOM). I have a greater problem with the fact that they've been only addressing this matter lately and haven't been engaging into scumhunting for a while now (especially BC). I'd advise you to get on it and people will automatically drop the poking for your fullclaim.
