Star Wars Quote Mafia- Game over

zu_Faul · Post Post #19 (isolation #0) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 2:20 am

Unvote: Sinister Overlord

zu_Faul · Post Post #29 (isolation #1) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 6:50 am

Vote: armlx

for not having posted yet.

zu_Faul · Post Post #100 (isolation #2) » Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:33 am

Armlx seems scum he wanted to quicklynch Thok while Thok was just providing a claim. Can hardly imagine something more scummy.

It isn't helpful. If you don't provide your reasoning, how will we know why you're voting for that person? Of course, I seem to be under suspicion to so maybe my playing style isn't much better. I have no idea why armlx is more suspicious than Dranko.

FOS: RangerOfTheNorth

A try to defend armlx. If the latter is scum, so should RangerOfTheNorth be.

zu_Faul · Post Post #127 (isolation #3) » Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:45 am

^good post.

zu_Faul · Post Post #140 (isolation #4) » Fri Nov 25, 2005 2:07 am

I would vote him, if he wasn't one away from lynch.

FOS: Dranko20

zu_Faul · Post Post #158 (isolation #5) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:33 am

I don't think we should lynch him... if I was about to make a role to this quote, I would have madde something very bad for the town...

Vote: RangeroftheNorth

Post 82:

I have no idea why armlx is more suspicious than Dranko.

Post 123: [qoute]I'll admit that he [=Dranko] wasn't as scummy as armlx[/quote].
Something there doesn't make sense.

zu_Faul · Post Post #163 (isolation #6) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:11 am

If you have so many good reasons why don't you vote me?
Vote stays.
And, oh it does make sense, what about a role that does harm to us if it is killed.
And no, you're not my victim. It's just chance.

zu_Faul · Post Post #190 (isolation #7) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 4:30 am

[quote=Thok"]
vote zu_faul for his post 158.
[/quote]

FOS

Thok because he made a post. [/sarcasm]

zu_Faul · Post Post #191 (isolation #8) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 4:31 am

Thok wrote:
vote zu_faul for his post 158.

FOS

Thok because he made a post. [/sarcasm]

zu_Faul · Post Post #242 (isolation #9) » Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:29 am

Oh.
My.
F***ing.
God.

Need. A. Vote. Count. Please!

zu_Faul · Post Post #275 (isolation #10) » Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:31 am

Vote SOS

Not a nice way to speak...

zu_Faul · Post Post #319 (isolation #11) » Wed Dec 07, 2005 7:23 am

SOS, if you find all the things mentioned in your last post so scummy, why don't you vote ANYONE if this is a town full of scum?
Vote stays.
And grats to Norinel for counting to 3 properly

PBUG wrote: It's not my fault that people post when I'm gone and I don't keep track of the last post I read.

Whose fault is it then?

zu_Faul · Post Post #336 (isolation #12) » Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:01 am

Why is everyone turning back on Dranko when we have a target in SOS, and we have a reason for it.

zu_Faul · Post Post #488 (isolation #13) » Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:45 am

Don't lynch Shamrock; just lynch SOS

Vote SOS

Two kills matches perfectly, doesn't it? One to kill Stoofer and one to "prove" your innocence. Lying Scumbag.

zu_Faul · Post Post #511 (isolation #14) » Fri Dec 16, 2005 11:44 am

"Search your feelings. You know it to be true."
Cop
S_O was found innocent Night1, therefore my unvote of him without a vote.
Shamrock was found innocent at night2.
SOS was found guilty on Night3.

Oh and in my pm it seems like I'm not the only cop.

zu_Faul · Post Post #814 (isolation #15) » Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:18 am

Nice game, nice frame.