Star Wars Quote Mafia- Game over

[Thoth]

vote:Thok

There can be only one.

[Thoth]

unvote:Thok

To the mod: Can we vote/unvote after a finishing vote (eventhough it won't count if the finishing vote was indeed the last vote).
Could be important if you want to give someone some time to speak after a wrong finishing vote, but don't want to keep him one away from lynch, so that the first one posting after you can finish im of.
Conversely if you might want to finish someone of for good and cast a real finishing vote..

[Thoth]

I basically agree with what ibaesha just posted. Would like to hear more from armlx though before adding my vote.

[Thoth]

I'd also like to hear from dranko what he meant with that. No vote for now though.

[Thoth]

My guess for the 'boring conversation' role would be a day vig. That would usually be enough for me to vote him as more often than not this is a scum ability. This time, in the light of his quote, it looks much more like a protown one though.

[Thoth]

Thoth: I thought post 99 from Thoth was odd. He agreed with a strong anti-armlx post from ibeasha, but didn't vote armlx. Instead he said he wanted to hear more from armlx before adding his vote. But armlx had already claimed. Nervous about getting on a bandwagon of someone he knew to be town? His post 184 is also odd.

I missed the roleclaim obviously (and was not the only one in that looking at some later posts)

What is odd about my 184 post? I gave my opinion on the naked one's quote.

[Thoth]

Sinterklaas coming up, so hardly time to post today and tomorrow. Just dodging the activity check

[Thoth]

Let me try then.

I think the argument against Quailman is that he voted PB for lurking (and attacked BJ for unvoting PB) where PB had posted just the day before that (more recent than Q himself). Both were away before that because of some weird American holiday. In that light Quailman's vote seems rather strange to me as well.
Add to that that he checked in several times, but gave no explanation for this I can understand people voting for him.

The thing I don't like about this bandwagon is the speed with which it started and the fact that noone typed out their reasons and just voted, making it especially easy for scum to hop along.

[Thoth]

Unless ibaesha's vote counts double my guess is: No.

[Thoth]

Counting is not one of Norinel's strong points

[Thoth]

Lol @ PBuG for using 'you idiot' and 'I didn't see an entire page or two' on the same line.

[Thoth]

Let me finish it of then:

vote:elvis_knits

[Thoth]

Sorry completely forgot different rules:

unvote
Finishing vote: elvis_knits

I've indeed not been so active last week and hardly been on. I'm not buying the claim though, so I put my vote on. I'm not convinced there are quotes from the 2nd series with only one other player saying they have one. Getting one so obscure and adding basic townie is enough for me.

[Thoth]

I have to agree with Coron here. There's no need to rush a day like this. Just let everybody get in and then lynch someone.

[Thoth]

Where is everyone?

I think that TSAGod is a good target from the quicklynchers. He's been keeping a low profile throughout the game.

vote:TSAGod

rajrhcpfreak claimed already and without a counterclaim he's definitively not mafia in my eyes. Could still have been recruited into the cult though as his double vote giving ability must have been high on the cult's desired acquisition list.

[Thoth]

It's 3 out of 6 if I'm not mistaken. PB's 2nd vote was just a typo correction.

[Thoth]

So there's four of six required. I totally missed yesterday. I was off to scout camp for a while.

No need to go that far to miss it. I just went to bed and already missed yesterday (it lasted from 10.25PM to 4.23AM my time).

[Thoth]

Mod: Could you prod a few players? The day is already 5 days old and still only 5 out of 10 players have posted.

[Thoth]

TSAGod/Dranko: Why are you voting ranger? You both voted without any explanation. Would be interested to hear the reasoning.
Hell, would be interested to hear anything the way this game is going .

[Thoth]

I'll Vote: Dranko also, I guess. I don't really like the TSA wagon (

because lynching zu_faul did seem to make sense at the time

) and the Ranger wagon makes even less sense to me.

The reason the quicklynchers are targeted is not because they lynched zu_faul. There were good reasons for lynching him.
The reason is that he was lynched so fast. There's no good argument to lynch him without even giving him the chance to speak, unless you're scum and don't want to give him the chance to reveal last nights result.

[Thoth]

You quote me and then you change 1 word in each quote when you repeat them in your own words, so they mean almost the complete opposite of what I said .

Alright, this isn't much, but it does seem sort of fishy. Thoth states initially that TSAGod would be a good target

for

the "quicklynchers" and votes him for that reason. Later, however, he states that ther quicklynchers (including TSAGod) are being targeted

because they lynched zu_faul

.

First bolding: I said

from

the quicklynchers, not for.
Second bolding: I said

not

because they lynched zu_faul.

After this remarkable twisting of my words I'd even more like to hear from Quailman whether he was indeed blocked the last two nights as Ranger says. Of course Q may have a role with which he can not know that.

[Thoth]

<-- Needs to learn to type faster

[Thoth]

Quailman is not responisble for either of last nights two kills.

Sorry, guess you're not the only one misreading. Read this is not responsiblefor a kill last two nights.

[Thoth]

Dranko is certainly a good option. The main thing that worries me is that he counterclaimed SOS earlier in the game. I cannot remember many counterclaims by scum this early in the game.

[Thoth]

vote:TSAGod

Still the same reasons why I voted him yesterday and now he added another one with his vote on Ibaesha.
I'm not sure what the 'obvious' reasons are for voting Ibaesha, but her continuously getting the double vote would seem like a good reason to keep raj alive if Ibaesha was scum.

[Thoth]

I think it's clear that the mafia didn't know who raj was as otherwise he would still be alive (unless some other source killed him and mafia didn't kill, but that seems really unlikely).

I've not seen a mafia spy that knew who the mafia was at the start of the game, but they sometimes have an investigation ability. Never seen an investigation ability coupled with another ability though. That would seem a little strong to me.

[Thoth]

I think it's very unlikely that Fritzler was able to recruit every night. Otherwise his role would be extremely overpowered.

[Thoth]

... when the mafia spy/vote doubler gave Thoth two votes today, when he had been giving them to Ibaesha. He clearly found something out and not knowing he'd be slain, decided to help Thoth.

You've got to be kidding me. You mean that if the mafia spy found me as mafia and he was a complete and utter retard he would give me the double vote today.

There would be no way for that to be beneficial. If he gets killed that night (which is not that unlikely as the ability is not one scum wants around) he just managed to fuel precisely the argument you're using as his role is revealed. If he does not get killed the double vote is of little use as there are too many townies left.

The clearly correct play for the spy/vote doubler if he can investigate and found mafia would be to wait until coming night to give the double vote. If he survives that night he can reveal himself and have a day majority. If he doesn't survive it depends on how the other kills go that night whether the mafia wins the game right there.

[Thoth]

Activity check: Prodding ibaesha and Shamrock.

Hi.

TSAGod- 3 (

Thoth

, PeaceBringer)

So, since if neither of you changes your vote he'll be lynched Tuesday, could one of you recap your reasons for voting TSA?

I already gave my reasons previously (to which TSAGod never responded), but I'll repeat them again.

1. Speedlynching zu_faul. There was no protown reason to not give him a chance to talk.

2. Low participation level. Almost all his posts are 1 line only (or a quote and 1 line fromhimself). Especially before he started getting votes.

3. Voting Ibaesha for a very weak reason, similar to the one Quailman is voting me for now, but even worse.