Open 249: Mayo Clinic **Game Over!**

warriormode · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:01 am

Im inclined to lynch scott or hacker today. It really doesn't matter because one will get lynched and the other Im probably vig killing. Scott has been very low key like everyone else has been saying. Hacker's slot just pisses me off. Animor was retarded and Katsuki already pointed out Hacker's idea of letting docs lead scum hunting. I'm placing my vote with smashbro. I've liked all of his thoughts so far in this game.

Vote: Scott

Katsuki · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:34 am

*point at sig*

I would prefer hacker over scott, but if warrior is vig'ing hacker, then I will vote scott if needed.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:20 am

Sigh, voting me for being low-key is laughable given the lurking by Phaen, Antihero. If I get lynched one of you please kill Phaen, the whole I can't get into this game, idk why I just cant! is so scummy. She hasn't done anything this game especially this day.

It DOES matter who you lynch. Saying that is beyond ridiculous. Lynch candidates cannot be protected, NKs can. So don't feel resigned to this lynch because you'll kill your other read at night. That is not guaranteed and we can lose this game tonight.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:21 am

Also don't reveal your ideas on vig targets. Scum has a doctor and they don't need any hints who they should protect.

HackerHuck · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 1:17 pm

Katsuki wrote:This post is quite the gem.
Lets have the docs, half of which are scum, lead the scumhunting.

How are you going to figure out who the scum are if the confirmed townies are the only ones doing scumhunting?
Let the docs run around pointing the fingers at each other and have the confirmed town sort out the mess. That way everyone that matters is on record.
The other part of that is that we don't want the vigs laying out all of their suspects so that the scum have a better idea of whom to target with their doc and nightkill.

You don't want to commit to a target now anyway, because you should be reevaluating your vig target based on who gets lynched and how they flip.

crywolf20084 · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 1:42 pm

Vote Count: Day 2

5 to lynch someone; 4 to not lynch anyone.

Scott Brosius: (4) (L-1)

JesseSheffield, Phaen, smashbro_of_the_SSS, warriormode

HackerHuck: (2)

Antihero, Katsuki

Phaen: (1)

Scott Brosius

Not Voting

HackerHuck

Once again, any mistakes, let me know. etc etc

HackerHuck · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 2:04 pm

crywolf20084 wrote:
Vote Count: Day 2

5 to lynch someone; 4 to not lynch anyone.

Scott Brosius: (4) (L-1)
JesseSheffield, Phaen, smashbro_of_the_SSS, warriormode

HackerHuck: (2)
Antihero, Katsuki

Phaen: (1)
Scott Brosius

Not Voting

HackerHuck

Once again, any mistakes, let me know. etc etc

Mod

, it looks like I should have two votes.

I didn't realise that I hadn't voted. I thought it was on Antihero, but I guess I missed it in my day one post.

I'll give us another day to get some more posting in before I drop the hammer on Scott. Based on his last post, I'm now doubtful of a Scott/Phaen/Antihero scum team, but he could just be throwing up some noise.

Edit was to fix a number by mod. 10/4/10 9:28pm EDT

crywolf20084 · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 2:22 pm

shoot. I forgot to change the number. thanks for catching it.

Phaen · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:11 pm

I like how Scott says I need to be vigged tonight & then in the very next post he says not to reveal ideas on vig targets.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:49 pm

Good to see you are keeping up with the thread without posting content.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:20 am

Phaen wrote:I like how Scott says I need to be vigged tonight & then in the very next post he says not to reveal ideas on vig targets.

Also I meant for the vigs to not reveal their ideas. We can chat all we want about it, when it comes down to it, we aren't shooting.

Katsuki · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:28 am

You know.

Scott is starting to seem more town than phaen right now.
Phaen activity thus far in D2 is... slightly like scott in D1... This bothers me, as it seems like that phaen may be trying to avoid saying anything incriminating against herself...

JesseSheffield · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:34 am

I would agree with the above but I really don't find it any worse than Scott.

HackerHuck · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:49 am

Katsuki wrote:You know.

Scott is starting to seem more town than phaen right now.
Phaen activity thus far in D2 is... slightly like scott in D1... This bothers me, as it seems like that phaen may be trying to avoid saying anything incriminating against herself...

Yet you're not voting for either...

I'm also thinking Scott's town now. If he were scum, one of his buddies would have hammered to gain some town cred. Anti-hero made it clear he wasn't voting and and Katsuki didn't want to do it either. I'm swapping Scott for Katsuki in my last scum slot, although I'm not entirely sure that both scum would camp out on me so early in the day.

Although I'd prefer an Antihero lynch, this will even things up (2 docs on each wagon). Let's see who jumps where.

VOTE: Phaen

And in case it's still not obvious, the docs should

only

be protecting the vigilantes tonight and it would be best to pick one randomly to maximize the chances of protection.

Katsuki · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:48 am

I wonder why I am not voting for either of them?

Maybe it is because I like Hackerscum lynch better.

Katsuki · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:49 am

@Scott: Why phaen over hacker?

Scott Brosius · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:01 pm

Katsuki wrote:@Scott: Why phaen over hacker?

Scott Brosius wrote:THe whole claiming a lack of interest in a game for whatever reason I find to be scummy. I find that people who really feel this way replace out, but nobody wants to replace out as scum. Hence people who claim this and stay in the game are usually scum.

I find that tell pretty accurate, and it's clear she's following the thread, not commenting on anything though. Hacker is at least participating.

JesseSheffield · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:34 pm

Better question- Why Phaen over you, Scott?

Scott Brosius · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 1:15 pm

I'm actually producing content. Phaen's D2 has consisted of listing a scum team without much reason, claiming she's not "into the game", an empty promise of a D1 reread and comments, and popping in for a failed attempt to discredit me further. No content and lurking.

JesseSheffield · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 4:12 pm

Hm. I'm not sure why but I actually feel inclined to agree with you there.

HackerHuck · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 4:54 pm

Katsuki, what ever happened to your beef with Antihero? You two were all over each other for a while yesterday and you both seem to have dropped it.

I'm also interested in what Antihero thinks about Katsuki's interest in wagoning me today. Do you think he's bussing or do his actions make one of us appear more townish?

Katsuki · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:25 pm

You happened.

Antihero has been :goodposting: today, hence why my attention has been focused elsewhere, like on hackerscum for example. I have yet to find anything scummy in antihero posts today, though I too am rather curious as to why he still finds me scummy.

HackerHuck · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:55 pm

Katsuki wrote:Antihero has been :goodposting: today, hence why my attention has been focused elsewhere, like on hackerscum for example. I have yet to find anything scummy in antihero posts today, though I too am rather curious as to why he still finds me scummy.

Really?
I'm now very curious what you find to be :goodposting: Could you link/quote some of that?
I'm also wondering what happened to this-

Katsuki in post 349 wrote:Erg.

I will see if I have the energy for analysis tonight. I have another I must get to first though.

My top suspects are as follows
Hacker - For D2 comments. I think I explained some of it already. He is my top candidate.
Scott - Accuses me of doing nothing when his own iso is essentially empty. Seems like coasting scum imo.

Antihero: Useless player. Knows nothing but misrep.

Phaen is prob town imo. Need to look at her though.
Jesse is most likely town as well.

I REALLY THINK, THOUGH, THAT WHAT OUR VIG'S THINK ARE MOST IMPORTANT. CONFIRMED THEY ARE, NONE OF THE REST OF US ARE.

So you've recently said that you think Scott is more town than Phaen, you're now saying that Antihero is :goodposting:. I get that you think I'm scum and maybe that earlier comment means you think that Phaen is scummy now. If that's the case, then who is your new third scum?

warriormode · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:33 pm

Unvote

Need to take a step back.

Antihero · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:36 am

HackerHuck wrote:Katsuki, what ever happened to your beef with Antihero? You two were all over each other for a while yesterday and you both seem to have dropped it.

I don't believe I did such a thing.

Hackerhuck wrote:I'm also interested in what Antihero thinks about Katsuki's interest in wagoning me today. Do you think he's bussing or do his actions make one of us appear more townish?

Your wagon is small and probably not going anywhere. Kat's "interest in wagoning" you doesn't mean you're on opposite teams. In fact, since your wagon probably isn't going anywhere, it looks more like a bus.

Phaen's nitpicking isn't helping her case...