Mafia on Holy Orders (Game Over!)

Iecerint · Post Post #1700 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 3:20 pm

It doesn't make much sense that smoking/lighting drains the battery AND half of it is from scum...why wouldn't scum just always spam gibberish?

M=W being scum would make me feel so good... :/

Furcolow · Post Post #1701 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:15 pm

Haylen wrote:Furcolow, "Iecerint has no scumtells. Vote Iecerint. I'll switch." Isn't that what you're saying about me too? That I'm not scummy but that you think I'm scum?

Reading.

but you replaced vezokpiraka, who is completely the opposite

Plum · Post Post #1702 (ISO) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:53 pm

Guys.

Iec lynch is good.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1703 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:37 am

Iecerint wrote:
M=W being scum would make me feel so good... :/

but he is not, is he?

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1704 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:39 am

Agar, I am curious given out recent back and forth.

if you had to put a percentage on M=W being scum, what would it be?

Iecerint · Post Post #1705 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 1:18 am

I would love M=W being scum because that would match my D1 feelings, etc. But I don't think he's scum with Haylen. This is old news.

pacman281292 · Post Post #1706 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 2:01 am

@Plum, CKD, and anyone voting Iecerint: Why do you think (aside from CKD's... er... gut is it?) that Iecerint is scum?
Just voting in without reason is useless, and annoying. did you know?
@Iecerint: I think you're now under pressure. So, I think that active lurking will worsen your situation. WAKE UP.
Post (and likely vote) tonight. No time now
/quickposting

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1707 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 2:24 am

yeah, just as useless as not voting, at least you know what my fucking stance is.

also, is my vote just gut pac?...read over my posts.

Iecerint · Post Post #1708 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 2:30 am

I'VE BEEN VOTING FOR AGES. AND POSTING CONSISTENTLY. LYNCH SP WITH ME. HE IS SCUM.

I'll help lynch M=W if it comes to it. It looks unavoidable at this point, since the Haylen wagon is gone and no one will lynch SP with me. But I'm not going to like it, because I don't think M=W is scum with Haylen.

This is all very old news btw. Just to be clear.

Haylen · Post Post #1709 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:32 am

Me=Weird is scum because:

* He case of Vezok was complete bullcrap. "He random voted the largest wagon." That's not scummy, that's called applying a bit of pressure to a player to get them to squeal and talk, what he said is a misrep.

* He votes Furculow without explaining why. Looks like a bussing attempt to me.

* A lot of what he says is Information about the game rather than analysis, which isn't very helpful or pro-town. It's a way of looking like you're posting lots without posting much at all.

* Hypocritical, in his #17 iso, he said that AtoE is a nulltell but I'm pretty sure he said that my outburst was scummy when they can be listed in the same category.

* Vote hops from Vezok to Furcolow quite spectacularly in his #21 iso, scummy.

* Has seemed to go after players that are easy targets since the beginning of the game ie Vezok and Furcolow. If M=W flips scum then I would be very doubtful about Furcolow being scum with him.

* pacman/Furcolow, I can't remember which one of you said it but why am I apparently 'caught scum' for getting angry and posting in caps whereas M=W isn't? That's called holding players to different standards and If M=W flips scum then I would consider the idea that he might have been bussing Furcolow as of this sentence.

* Iso's 29-34 seems very desperate.

* Decides that he doesn't want tracker results. Maybe he's scared that I'm going to track him.

I don't understand why M=W got a free ride for what the person he replaced did, whilst I am apparently scummy scum scum for what Vezo has done. I haven't committed any scumtells this game and I have been providing as much content as I possibly can. I haven't lurked. I have been active except for my V/LA and my ability is provable and I have breadcrumbed about it. So the only reason people think I'm scum is because Vezok is a newbie and can't play as well as you guys can, he had a language barrier so I am sure that he misunderstood a lot of what was being asked of him.

Iecerint · Post Post #1710 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:34 am

I'm pretty sure Furcolow is town.

SocioPath · Post Post #1711 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:32 am

curiouskarmadog wrote:
unvote, vote Iecerint..

dont tease me now.

Plum wrote:Guys.

Iec lynch is good.

I CAN GET BEHIND THIS.
HOW YOU LIKE ME NOW IEC?

UNVOTE
VOTE: IEC

POORLY PLAYED.

Iecerint · Post Post #1712 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:34 am

A cosmic force is preventing SP from ever being town while I am in the game with him.

This game is not an exception.

SP is scum.

SocioPath · Post Post #1713 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:35 am

SocioPath wrote:POORLY PLAYED.

Iecerint · Post Post #1714 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:47 am

Is that your special way of claiming scum?

Aside: people who have played with me know that I would've joined one of the wagons and made a big gross post with lots of reasons for THIS (whichever) player being scum, if I were scum. [/self-meta]

This applies to SP/CKD/Plum/maybe some other players too idk, but definitely those three.

Soooooooooo basically that is bizarre.

SocioPath · Post Post #1715 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:10 am

Iecerint wrote:Aside: people who have played with me know that I would've joined one of the wagons and made a big gross post with lots of reasons for THIS (whichever) player being scum, if I were scum. [/self-meta]

Except that doesn't work for you when I'm in your games, now does it?

Iecerint · Post Post #1716 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:17 am

No. I think I always manage to lose when you (being scum) are in the game with me, except for that one time.

Sometimes I am right about things before losing though.

Me=Weird · Post Post #1717 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:41 am

Eh. Tuesday's are really busy, but I'll

tear hayl's case to bits

respond to hayl's case tomorrow. Deadline's coming up, and a chrono lynch isn't going to happen, it seems.

Unvote, Vote: Iecerint

No reasons(yet, it's possible I'll have some reasoning tomorrow). It's just me not wanting a no-lynch and not wanting to be lynched either.

Haylen · Post Post #1718 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:54 am

You're voting to lynch someone without giving reasoning, again? O_O

This is why M=W needs to go, he's very obviously scum! It's mindless bandwagonning.

Iecerint · Post Post #1719 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:59 am

Why don't you lynch SP with me? Do you think he's town?

Haylen · Post Post #1720 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:01 am

I have a null read on SP since I haven't seen him posting much :/

Iecerint · Post Post #1721 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:02 am

I was talking to M=W but k.

Me=Weird · Post Post #1722 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:06 am

Haylen, you say "again". I believe this is the first time. And yeah, I am, but it's better than a no-lynch.

Iecerint, 1. I've been getting a slight scummy feel from your posts. 2. You're more likely to get lynched. 3. I have a complete null-read on SP, unlike you where I have gut.

Haylen · Post Post #1723 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:28 am

Incorrect, you vote hopped from Vezok to Furcolow, twice without explaining why.

Chronopie · Post Post #1724 (ISO) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:25 am

/prod dodge.

I'm already voting M=W, but I continue to endorse his lynch, based on his play since I last checked in.

Hayl is looking

far

townier than M=W, and Vezo was, bluntly, an Idiot. I'm half way inclined to just dismiss Vezo's entire play, and purely look at hayl for hayl.