read cont'd from page 5...
Nexus votes for absent Jack. Weak/safe play. If ever questioned he could say "I am just pressuring him to add to the conversation".
Farcry jumps on to the demonhybrid wagon literally one post after Thor votes him. Provides no real reasoning other than "A wagon needs to be started, and we need to start talking."
Demonhybrid then claims vanilla townie. Demonhybrid also continues to defend farcry, saying that he understands why Farcry voted him.
Farcry believes the claim...but does not unvote.
Farcry then omgusses Jimfinn. Here is his post:
Far_Cry wrote:I find this game pitiful. No wants to do shit, no one wants to say shit. Instead, we are resorting to voting each other for some ridiculous reasons. I have yet to find one good case against anybody, one that's reasonable and makes sense. Here, we have jimfinn, who mind you, has been actively lurking, going out and calling me scum trying to spring up activity. While it is true that I said it would be ridiculous to vote and then unvote so soon (and it would be), he failed to notice that the reason of my vote was just for the sake of actvity, and then goes around and twists the meanings of my actions.
Now I would like you to tell me who's scummier. UNVOTE: DemonHybrid, VOTE: jimfinn
Farcry: it is frustrating that you seem to not be able to objectively look at your own situation and logically look at why people are voting for you. You say yourself that this is a difficult game to get a read on people, but then attack people when, in your opinion, they have less than watertight cases against you. I can see from the number of posts in your profile that you aren't new here, so surely you understand that in any given mafia game people are going to attack you and vote for you.
In any case the arguments for voting you are fairly sound.
@ thor: could you please direct me to one of Jack's better games. I have never played with him and want to see what all the fuss is about.
Demonhybrid claims that sarcasm is a scumtell (?) in regards to Thor.
Singersigner also thinks that thor is being anti-town and confusing the town with sarcastic remarks.
Andrigan wrote:Thor665 wrote:We might need to make a list of who isn't buddying with me in this game - why is that part of so many cases? Do I have a known meta for succumbing to buddying I should be aware of?
The buddying I am referring to is from this quote:
redtail896 wrote:@Thor, I'm not voting DH because I'm deciding between him and signer. The "case" against you is so absurd that, if I didn't know better, I would consider it RVS.
The emphasis here seemed a bit stark for me. Even though I believe Thor is town, I'm not sure the case against Thor that Redtail is referring to is totally absurd or deserving of quotes around the word. This kind of certainty would seem characteristic of a cop had it been day 2, and the cop had already received a town reading for the person. Since it is day 1 and no cop investigations have taken place, I find Redtail's dismissal suspicious (as scum trying to score town points).
I disagree. The case against Thor was indeed lacking in any substance.
singersigner wrote:DemonHybrid wrote:He's replacing out. Is there any reason for you to say this?
She's new and was rather embarrassed about replacing out. I know her IRL (she goes to the same college as I do).
Then you can be the one to console her IRL, not make excuses for her here. People replace out all the time. It's not your job to make excuses. To me, it sounds like you're just trying to protect someone. I really don't like this. You're not sitting well with me at all anymore. Thor's responses to my questions have been acceptable, but you're still making excuses for someone who's not even here anymore.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DemonHybrid
This is a massive stretch. It makes perfect sense for someone to try to support a friends reputation on a site like this.
As demonhybrid later stated: "me asking everyone to not be pissed that she's replacing out HAS NOTHING TO DO with my view on what her alignment could be."
Summary and suspects:
I think farcry is very lucky to not have copped much heat today; wishy-washy in the beginning, refusal to admit to hypocrisy, then admitting to hypocrisy but asking everyone to just move on, omgus voting, the "unvote would be ridiculous" thing, and jumping on two wagons fairly shamelessly.
I am suspicious of singersigner as well (mainly for weak cases that seems nothing better than excuses to vote for people), but out of the two I would say farcry is the more likely to be scum as his wagon died while signersigner is seemingly on -1 and very close to a lynch.
vote: farcry
There is still a few days to get this lynch through but everyone has to make up their minds quickly.