Civilization Mafia - Town Wins!

SinisterOverlord · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 2:25 pm

Bamboomancer has already been prodded. He is next in line of players to be replaced.

Thok · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Sat Nov 19, 2005 7:06 pm

Much as I hate to break order, shall we assume Bamboo forgot to send in choices and go to d_rouge next?

rajrhcpfreak · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Sat Nov 19, 2005 7:16 pm

yes lets assume

inHimshallibe · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Sat Nov 19, 2005 7:18 pm

I hate to break order as well, but my activity will be spotty (as I expect will be the case for most) throughout this week.

I have nothing to give.

Mr. Flay · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:43 pm

Waiting for d_rouge (and glaring at the out-of-order-ness)....

VisMaior · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Sun Nov 20, 2005 7:03 pm

We might wan t look at people who broke the order, later.

Tyfo · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Sun Nov 20, 2005 9:44 pm

Btw, I replaced ... someone.

Tyfo · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Sun Nov 20, 2005 9:55 pm

Wouldn't the "evil" civilazations want to have as much control as possible? Or is the list just for easiness of claiming?

VisMaior · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:12 am

What do you mean?

VisMaior · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:12 am

Also, please make sure you know who you replace, get all relevant information, whatnot, before you post.

Tyfo · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:27 am

I know who I am replacing, just forgot the name when I posted.

VisMaior · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:27 am

Could you elaborate about your comment then? I dont understand what you mean.

Tyfo · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:51 am

Just got a quick thought about if the mafia (evil civs) could manipulate with the control of the list.

VisMaior · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 am

Thats why we chose a random list.

d_rouge · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:07 am

Sorry I made you wait, I hadn't seen that the order was changed for the replacing of Bamboo.

Anyway, I do have new information.

How much of that should I reveal?

VisMaior · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:13 am

WTF. If its an innocent result, you already said too much. If its a guilty result, I dont see why you should withhold it.

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:18 am

yeah. the list is guaranteed random using the forum's dice function.

d_rouge · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:20 am

For example because since scum are probably lying about their result, they could adjust it depending on what I say.
I'm not sure what's better.

If anyone has an idea of what's better for the town, I will gladly comply.

Puzzle · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:30 am

@ D_rouge :
I think you should say if it's a guilty or an innocent result. At this point, say the name if it is a guilty but if innocent, I'd rather wait and proceed to the next claims and then do our normal wagonning / lynching process.
At some point, we'll ask someone for a claim. If it is the innocent result you got, tell us so and we won't ask for any info from this person, saving the info for possible counter-claims.
If not, let the claim go but we'll still need to know the full result before the end of the day even for the guy you cleared, just in case you get night-killed next.

Once again, I would have preferred to do our normal stuff before claiming results but hey...

VisMaior · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:34 am

no, wait.

VisMaior · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:39 am

You might want to withhold even a guilty result until everyone claimed. Here is why: the scum will not know if you have an innocent result or a guilty one. That is benefical, because he pretty much has to assume you got a guilty result. He might want to counterclaim your result, and f you happen to have an innocent result that might out a scum still.

Puzzle · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:46 am

Not anymore now that you've said it + I doubt scums would like to get down that road so early anyway.

VisMaior · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:52 am

Well, that I said it still does not say if it is a guilty result or an innocent, so no, its still valid. And there will be tomorrow too. If we agree to just out guilty results and withhold innocent ones, scum will kjnow if tomorrow someone has an innocent result if he claims to have a result and withholds it. But if we agree to do it the belated way scum will have the least information possible to adjust their fake results.

d_rouge · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:45 am

Having heard your views on the thing, I guess the best thing is to reveal informations little by little in order not to give scum any advantage.
I would say that we go on with claiming result/no result and after everybody has said that, people with informations will share it.

What do you think?

Mr. Flay · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:47 am

Well, at least we know Sinister Overlord wasn't lying to us about the abilities we all have... I'm fine with revealing information incrementally, but I still think all (useful) information should be revealed before we get to the end of the day. This is an excellent way to avoid any lurkers, however, so I say we proceed through the list.