Agreed.holycon wrote:i think we should wait for replacement
If they are a newbie and are indeed a bad ass then there's a reasonable chance they'll say something stupid and expose themselves anyway.
You are not allowed. This is a very STRICT rule.nameloc1986 wrote: @mod: How much can I actually refer to that game since it is ongoing?
Now that you bring it up, it's not really the way I meant to word it. What I meant to say was that if you questioned anything that Doubtful has said, I'll try my best to address your concerns on him. I went back and ISO'd him just in case of such questions. Since I'm filling in his shoes, I want to know everything he's done and try to think why. It was more of a "just-in-case" thing.Ellibereth wrote:HI^^^don't like this.try my best to explain why I think Doubtful played the way he did.
Noted!Robocopter87 wrote:You are not allowed. This is a very STRICT rule.nameloc1986 wrote: @mod: How much can I actually refer to that game since it is ongoing?
Especially in this game.
This game was originally Newbie 1004, until this exact rule was broken. We had to restart it all. And thus, Newbie 1013.
So please, Don't even think about ongoing games in this game.
I'm not. That's just one place I started. I will do more investigating, ISOing and finger pointing in a little bit.Ellibereth wrote:Why are you more interesting on working through an ISO of a player know the alignment as compared to the several here you probably don't.
Ummm........how is defending one's self scummish?MAD Scientist wrote:2) Holycon's right, you are acting defensive. I find that scummish
I'm pretty sure the someone wouldn't be THAT stupid to hammer this early on Day 1. Granted that's sorta WIFOM but who's gonna put themselves in that position? Scared to put someone at L-1 because it will make you suspicious?MAD Scientist wrote:I don't want to vote for you yet, because I think that would put you at L-1 (too lazy to check right now) and that's too dangerous with the lurkers around, but right now I'm essentially voting for you. (I guess that's FOS?)
This was said by ACM to MAD. I think ACM makes a good point here.AClockworkMelon wrote:The point was that you were accusing me of having not many any arguments despite having not done so yourself. Do you hold other players to a higher standard than you hold yourself?
A) Why are you invoking WIFOM on purpose? B) The bolded part disturbs me. Why is she singling herself out like this? C) Explain what Elli had to do with any of what you've said.MAD Scientist wrote:Clock: If you want a good WIFOM here's a great one: based on last game, you would be the easiest player for the scum to convince others that you are scum. I thought of this, unfortunately, after I posted that argument against you.So now I have to wonder if the scum are playing me for a fool(and I have a good idea what your answer would be =P). This thought, combined with what Elli is doing, is very disturbing...
Can you explain your reasons for suspecting Elli and ACM?MAD Scientist wrote:Oops, didn't notice this. Well, Elli, first. Probably still you second, because I really don't know about the others. Maybe holycon, since she has occasionally defended ElliAClockworkMelon wrote:@MAD - Who are your top two suspects and why?
If this ain't scumtell I don't know what is.MAD Scientist wrote:I really want to lynch him to deathhhh
Hmm i missed this or ignored it but anyways when i said ACM sounded defensive i never said it was scummy i belive i said he sounded the same as when i was in my first game with him were he was town?nameloc1986 wrote:2
MAD Scientist wrote:2) Holycon's right, you are acting defensive. I find that scummish
Probably some Abstract Math problems. When I took that course in college, I believe I had to go to therapy.Civil Scum wrote:Apparently Parnourie's role was so confusing and mind-boggling, that anyone who reads the PM is instantly stymied, and unable to comprehend what they've read, and even more unable to play the role. I wonder...what's written in that PM...though once you see it...you can never go back, and you are never the same.