Mini 1069 - Hospital Madness Mafia (Game Over!)

[Uprising]

Erm... do we normally instavote?

VOTE: Enigma for being an enigma.

[Uprising]

Why are we putting somebody at L-2?

[Uprising]

I haven't decided how I feel on anyone yet. Neutral reads for the most part.

Also, tomorrow, if I don't post a lot, I'm very sorry. It's Thanksgiving here.

[Uprising]

I'm not moving my vote until Enigma posts. If he has already posted, let me know. I must have missed it.

[Uprising]

@ Enigma, that first image was adorable.

I really don't know how I missed your post :$

The RVS doesn't make me nervous, I just have no idea what the S stands for. I'm not participating because I really see no reason for me to.


@ CooLDoG
1. I really had no idea why we were putting people at L-2. I don't understand how it is beneficial. I was just confused...

2. Is this question really directed at me?

3. I like seeing people posting and I know there was someone else who wasn't posting and I can't remember their name because of it.


UNVOTE:

[Uprising]

I had really no idea. My apologies.

[Uprising]

I have issues with random voting because I'm afraid I'll vote the wrong person and then everyone will be all like "OMG YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY SCUM NOW"

[Uprising]

chesskid3, you remind me of a child trying to guilt trip his parents into buying him a toy.

I do think you are a little scummy. I do think you are scum moreso than anyone else. However, I will not vote you yet because the day doesn't need to end yet (clearly).

[Uprising]

Yeah, you're not the only college student.

My reasons are the way you're acting. I'm not hopping on the bandwagon. I just feel you are scum, not because everybody else thinks so.

[Uprising]

@Everyone besides chesskid3
Sorry for not posting more, but I haven't found many relevant things to say.

[Uprising]

TL, are you the same TL who plays at #mafia with Xylbot?

[Uprising]

Erm... what is ISO?


I'm aware I myself am probably scummy to high heaven. Can anyone confirm this for me?
I'm having trouble reading most of you thus far.

[Uprising]

So, let's see.
ISO is the heap of posts of one given man. You can set it down:
Display post by users - > Wingless for exmaple. That'll show me my overall posts.

I thought you were scummy, because you unvoted someone and didn't vote anybody after it. I think you are new to this site(as I am too:D).

My second game here. I'm much more used to irc mafia

[Uprising]

I'm really afraid of voting incorrectly. Is there anyone we specifically want to lynch?

[Uprising]

Yeah, I have played a newbie game.

I just hate being wrong.

I'm rereading as well.

If I'm lurking between now and Tuesday it's because I have a Japanese midterm.

[Uprising]

CooLDoG isn't at L-1, is he? I can't find the current vote count. :$

[Uprising]

I have no idea who scum is. CooLDoG and Chesskid3 seem most likely to me.
UNVOTE: VOTE: CooLDoG

[Uprising]

Indeed, a claim would be lovely from you right now.

[Uprising]

TL, are you the same TL who plays at #mafia with Xylbot?

What is this stuff?

I was curious.

[Uprising]

Claiming is just lulz.

Quote Role PM please. Thanks.

This makes sense.


Where do you play irc mafia? I am interested.

I play at #mafia on irc.globalgamers.net, with Xyl's bot.

[Uprising]

UNVOTE:

CooLDoG, you better not be lying!

[Uprising]

Enigma, why are you tunnelling me? I see no reason for it, and it is quite irksome to not have an answer. I'm finding you to be scummy.

[Uprising]

In a DOCTOR THEMED GAME he could be zillions of types of doc. Now cut it out. And if he really is town, and he is more than just doc, all that his claiming will help do is help scum choose their night kill.

EXACTLY!


Enigma, you dork. Slaxx is very right. Don't make him claim.
Not d1, at least.

[Uprising]

VOTE: Enigma


Now that I've reread, I'm feeling him scum moreso than before. The tunneling isn't too kind, either.

[Uprising]

UNVOTE:

Oh, BTW, I'm a she, not a he.


VOTE: MooSpiker


You all don't want Enigma lynched SO I will go after a different scum.
MooSpiker is scum to me.

[Uprising]

I don't know how to explain WHY I think he's scum, and it isn't just because I feel he's accusing me, but there's something there.

Maybe my scumreads are off or completely inaccurate.

[Uprising]

[rant]@wing, lets say I kill every night and I mis-kill all of those times, that would lead the town into a pretty bad mess wouldn't it. Killing every night is not an option, however confirming myself as town is very good for the town. It lowers the number of targets from 12 to 11, or after this night 11 to 10 (note: if I don't kill). I will only kill a scummy player, I won't take your attitude to just kill the first person on the player list because it’s good. In fact it isn't good and if anyone suggests that type of play again I will be obliged to vote him or her d-2 (NS should be lynch today).
@Exe, I agree about the ending of wingless' plan, or any plan it is now over I won't talk about it anymore due to the fact that it gives scum info. Also sorry for not catching the vote thing...[/rant]
@Up, other then moo's lack of content/lurking what is your reason for voting him (your vote atm looks very omgusy, moo is correct on that one). Also we understand you are new at this, try not to keep useing it as a semi defense if you mis-lynch...

Then explain me why the town does always lynch someone. It is terrible if the town mislynches, so why don't you complain about that? Why don't you vote for no lynch?
Have you ever tried to make this game's mathematical model?
If you had, you'd know it is worth to kill anybody at random. Anybody.

He is quite right. Kill, CooLDoG, kill!

[Uprising]

However, if I'm not lynched today, I'm sure I'll die tonight.

Also, I haven't seen much of Zang and/or I've a null read on him.


I'll post more of my beliefs after my accounting class.

[Uprising]

However, if I'm not lynched today, I'm sure I'll die tonight.

Also, I haven't seen much of Zang and/or I've a null read on him.


I'll post more of my beliefs after my accounting class.

Why are you sure?

I didn't forget Zang.
I think it is very strange that he has only 7 votes here with a 3 post/day number. I found Enigma scummier. Zang, when he wrote, wrote content. Mainly about Tasky and a bit about chesskid.

Oh, I just figured that a lot of people will want town to kill me, because apparently I'm clearly scum.

[Uprising]

Parama is defmod

Agreed.

Wingless is town.
Slaxx is town.
Exe is town.
TL is probably town.
ChessKid3 is town.
Unsure about NS.
Unsure about Tasky.
Unsure about Zang.
Moospiker is likely scum.
CooLDoG apparently isn't scum, but I'm still feeling he is.
Enigma may be scum, but apparently isn't. But I still think so.

Fixed tag.

[Uprising]

Agh, I fail.

[Uprising]

Enigma is deftown, Moospiker is probscum, NS is probVI.
Tasky is a nullread.
Exe is probtown but he's really good so :/
TL is probscum
Cooldog is probtown
Slaxx is definactive
Zang is a nullread
Parama is defmod
Uprising is probtown

Wingless is town.
Slaxx is town.
Exe is town.
TL is probably town.
ChessKid3 is town.
Unsure about NS.
Unsure about Tasky.
Unsure about Zang.
Moospiker is likely scum.
CooLDoG apparently isn't scum, but I'm still feeling he is.
Enigma may be scum, but apparently isn't. But I still think so.

This is another ridiculous post. Uprising thinks CoolDog and Enigma are scum, but decides to just follow chesskid because he wants to buddy with him. And the only reason he thinks Enigma is scum is because of Enigma's vote on him. Uprising is a joke.

And wow, NS fails.

I DIDN'T READ HIS READS BEFORE I POSTED.


I'm not a joke.
Ugh. You're ridiculous.

[Uprising]

Also, how the hell was I following chesskid3 when I posted my thoughts on people?

[Uprising]

Is it far too early to put NS at L-1?

[Uprising]

I don't think lynching a claimed PR is a good idea right now.
Also, don't forget that even if a scum is faking to be a PR, he has to provide us with results. all those results are always very valuable information in one way or another.
therefore I think it is extremely hard to keep a fakeclaim up for the whole day
therefore even if a PR is fakeclaiming, delaying his kill is very valuable for us since we can make a better decision on who to kill, since mislynching a PR on day one is pretty disastrous for us.
additionally, delaying the lynch get's us much more information:
if we lynch scum now (unless we lynch CooLDoG), scum will get rid of the other informative role and we will have no information at all from both the roles. If however we lynch the same scum (with a higher hitting percentage) later, we will have gotten some nights worth of results, and if the mafia kills one PR, we will have an even easier task at spotting the lying scum.
and, don't forget, that there is the option that there is no fakeclaiming scum. I think we should absolutely not underestimate this possibility. Just because it is unlikely that three claims turn out to be three PR's, it doesn't mean it is impossible.

I'm not entirely sure if I understand exactly what you're trying to say. I'm really sorry.

[Uprising]

I'm not satisfied enough yet to change my vote. Sure, NS does have a beneficial role, regardless of alignment, but who's to say that isn't a fakeclaim role PM?
Charnel is giving me scumvibes, although I'm aware I'm too inexperienced to know anyone's meta. (This is partly why I dislike meta.)

[Uprising]

I really don't understand how I am

obvious

scum...

Please explain this to me.

[Uprising]

Charnel is giving me scumvibes, although I'm aware I'm too inexperienced to know anyone's meta. (This is partly why I dislike meta.)

Does this have anything to do with him voting you?

Vote: Uprising

Charnels case on him is good and he's the only person besides Tasky that I think is scummy.

No, it has nothing to do with him voting me.


I'm more than aware I can't talk anyone out of voting me, maybe because I'm not great at defending myself at this high of a number of players.

Sorry if I lurk in the next two days, I have a large assignment due.

I'll take this as a V/LA announcement, then.

[Uprising]

If he's town, he could check claims.

Only if we massclaimed. Which would again be anti-town. Am I the only one thinking this through?

Gotta say I agree with this.

MC won't be the best option in the next day, I feel.

I'm used to a different system, so I'm unaware of some of the protocols here. My apologies.

[Uprising]

I'm sorry I have a hard time not seeming scummy, I always do. I'm pretty sure you guys will call mostly anything I say about who scum is or isn't OMGUS/buddying/followingeveryoneelse, which is a little disheartening. I really can't do much else except run amok with my average role. I'm only really willing to lynch either Charnel or NS at this moment. This is clearly subject to change.

AND STILL no one has given me reasoning that I've actually understood to be reasoning as to why

I

am scum.

[Uprising]

My vote stays where it is.

Only 3 more Charnel votes to avoid nolynch, guys, come on.

WTF. You want to convince people to vote for me, not because you think I'm scummy, but because "the deadline is coming"?

The fact that NS leaves his vote to force a deadline lynch on me is scummy as hell.

confirm vote NS

This is NS as a pure survivalist, he doesn't bother with looking for scum.

I honestly managed to miss him saying that


I agree with Charnel's interpretation of this.

I do not like this at all.

[Uprising]

I don't disagree with you, chesskid.

Betting scum won't kill him.


TL isn't making sense to me anymore.
He may be scum, and is likely a good lynch. I want to see if he replies to it before I vote him.

And yeah, I don't think Charnel is scum anymore.
My vote and feelings on him had NOTHING to do with the fact he voted me, just for the record.

UNVOTE:


Sorry I haven't posted since the 26th, I feel bad about that.
Also, I'm sorry I say sorry a lot. It's a bad habit.

[Uprising]

So, at this rate, pretty sure we'll force a nolynch. Just sayin'.

I've been reading.

[Uprising]

It is formatted a little confusingly, I'll admit that.
But still, there must be a way to decipher it.


VOTE: TL

[Uprising]

nope, this relies on nothing. Uprising has acknowledged my point, while his vote is a pure bandwagon vote.

Means that something isn't right here.

and why are you posting my argument in your words when you clearly didn't understand it?

another question. Why did you try to make the case on Uprising and NS look bad right after your far from stunning pbpa on TL?

I didn't say NS is /the/ lynch for today.
I don't want to lynch him today.

Jesus, people.

[Uprising]

Erm...
What is vig fishing?

[Uprising]

Vig shoots whoever he thinks is scum, regardless of what other people say, imho. <3


Swearing on your signature isn't very effective...

[Uprising]

IMO, avatar bets are pointless and distracting, and at times, against the rules.

Against the rules?


I'm sorry, I've never heard of avatar bets or anything and have no idea what they mean.

[Uprising]

Okay, chesskid3, you're kinda now giving me scum vibes. You seem far too overeager for my liking...


Wingless isn't scum, guys, just FTR.


Enigma probably isn't either.

[Uprising]

I cannot explain my behaviour.

My suspicions...
I don't think chess is scum because he thinks I'm scum, ftr.
He is being overly eager about getting TL lynched ASAP.
I'm probably wrong, but it's fine. If he dies and I'm wrong, I'm sorry.

Wingless isn't giving me scumvibes and his recent posts don't show him as scum to me.
Ditto for Enigma.

[Uprising]

So you can mock me, chesskid? </3

[Uprising]

Erm... is it unnatural for a single day to go on this long? 30 pages, I mean...

TL, Charnel isn't scum. Do you intend to leave your vote there?

[Uprising]

quick (very quick) iso of UP reveals that she has never given a reason for any of her votes...

!) why haven't you given a reason for any of your votes?
@) why are you so indecisive?
#) what are your town+scum reads?

I may have given some reason, however it may have not sounded like it. If I didn't given reasons, it was because I was uncertain.

I'm always extraordinarily indecisive, regardless of alignment (and in real life).

I'm positive I posted my reads not long ago, I'll reread and come up with them again.


Enigma is not scum.

Tasky is not a VI.

[Uprising]

@Zang: Those two quotes are not contradictory at all.

During Day 1

, I thought you seemed pro-town for most of it. Now that we have more information, it reads differently. No contradiction there.

And your "2 votes is not a wagon" is a semantics argument that strawman's the point. You still heavily sheeped two people as the day went on longer. That's scummy.

As strange as it feels for me, I agree completely.

Zang saying Exe was contradictory confused me a fair bit, to be honest, especially after I reread them.

[Uprising]

Uprising town -> Exe scum

I'm pretty sure Exe isn't scum.

[Uprising]

Guys, I'm sorry. I'm sorry for lurking and making excuses. I'm really sick right now and trying to study for midterms. It's become hard to do anything for more than ten minutes at a time. I'm rereading what we have of today.

I deeply disagree with chesskid. Enigma is not scum.

[quote="chesskid3]also who else notices how all of the sudden there's a push for a switch to Uprising, and I'm being accused by (TL/Tasky/Uprising) for sticking with TL?[/quote]

I don't remember accusing you, however, I don't think I was making all that much sense.



Scum to Null to Town

Zang
Lrdwhyt
---
Chesskid3
Charnel
Tasky
---
Exe
Enigma
CooLDoG

As for explanations,

CooLDoG - is town. His revealed role PM did say that the victim would die of a heart attack, right? I'm sure a fake role PM probably wouldn't have the same flavour of a kill (I'm hoping).
Exe - is town. Although he did express a willingness to hammer, it took him longer than I'd've expected him to as scum. I know not everyone plays scum the same way I do.


---
I have to go now, I'll finish these up as soon as I can, which will probably be closer to my dinner time today.

[Uprising]

Also, I apparently fail at quoting.

[Uprising]

What is strawman?
I've never heard that.

[Uprising]

My god guys.
I'm horrible at putting what I mean into words.
You'll misconstrue it anyways.

SO GUYS, if I'm scum, who's my buddy.

I mean that I don't know how the hell to explain my behaviour, okay?

You never answered this. Stop avoiding it, Uprising.

I thought I'd answered it, but apparently it didn't post.
No, I did not think there was a change in behaviour.


Exe isn't scum because his aura in general doesn't feel scummy. That's not the only reason, though...

Yeah, Tasky, the problem is that another wagon is not going to help. There is no alternative to your proposed scenario.
If we wagon someone else, and they are town PR - we will not lynch them, most likely.
If we wagon someone else, and they are town vanilla - you're saying we should lynch them instead. This both reduces the chances of scum hitting a vanilla (and increases chances of hitting a PR) with their kill, as well as pretty much guarantees a townie lynch.
If we wagon someone else, and they are scum - they will claim town PR, and we will be in the same situation as the first one.
See how wagoning another person isn't going to help? When you've gotten as many claims as we have, it's the best idea to lynch the one that is most scummy. Which one do you think that is?

These sorts of things he says do feel legitimately town to me.
This has nothing to do with the fact he, at one point, said I seemed VI to him.


Oh, and I'm a little confused as to why CooLDoG is still alive (unless someone has protected him and not informed us of such).
Though I don't necessarily agree with his kill target, it's likely better that way (however, if I were him and not me, I'd've shot myself, seeing as many people seem to think I'm scum).
I'm not intentionally "sheeping" on other people's reads. My apologies for doing so.

More to come after I finish studying for management.

[Uprising]

...did Uprising basically claim that she tried to kill CoolDoG last night?

If that's what it sounded like, that wasn't my intent.

He claimed vig.

Would scum not kill the vig?

That's the only reason I said that.

Seems a little illogical to me, is all.

[Uprising]

CooLDoG - is town. His revealed role PM did say that the victim would die of a heart attack, right? I'm sure a fake role PM probably wouldn't have the same flavour of a kill (I'm hoping).

This is really naive. Please don't.

Okay, I understand. So... he may not be town, then?

I know scum could have killed him, but that he could have been protected....

[Uprising]

chesskid3, in all honesty, you just baffle me. Words cannot describe it. Well, they can. You're silly.

[Uprising]

I really like Exe's play and his overall mentality, including his sig. I feel I could learn from that.


I'm sorry I haven't participated much in the past 24-48 hours... been so sick and had a migraine that felt like someone was extracting my brain..



FTR, Zang may actually be a good lynch for us today. I'll come up with more after my two exams today.

[Uprising]

However, on chesskid. He softclaimed. That means he doesn't have to fullclaim, but gets the benefits. Scummy as hell. The fact that he tried to talk the TL lynch straight while he was already covering for himself when TL didn't even flip is even scummier. I'm quite convinced on Chesskid, and lets be honest, Zang would just be a lurker lynch.

Can't we force him to fullclaim or would that be futile at this point?

[Uprising]

I think I agree with tasky there.

[Uprising]

@Uprising: Your comment about Charnel not liking being called scummy would be better applied to you.

This isn't actually directed at me, right?

If it is, I can't remember saying that.

[Uprising]

LrdWhyt fell off the planet.

I want to hammer Zang.

Is this an awful idea?

[Uprising]

I just don't want to hammer with /someone/ not being around, like, at all.

[Uprising]

So, do we just claim or do we have an order to do such in?

[Uprising]

Guys, this is so awesome.

Uprising

, you are a

Doctor

.

You may protect another player, preventing any attempted kills on them. You will not be notified if your protect stops a kill.

You win when all threats to the town are eliminated.

Please confirm via PM with a paraphrase of your role's abilities.

First night I protected CooLDoG, cause, well, someone had to.

Second night I protected Enigma 'cause I was positive he wasn't scum.

Now I'm not so sure.

Who do we have left to claim?

[Uprising]

BECAUSE THE PERSON I PROTECTED DIED OMG LOLZ THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE IF I AM NOT AN INSANE DOC OK THANKS BYE

Maybe you're a quack?

[Uprising]

Lrdy does need to claim now.

So, uh... Charnel = mykonian?
Was there a point for the switch to and back?

[Uprising]

Chess, that doesn't explain who killed the other guy. x.x

[Uprising]

So you two have the same goddamn kill flavour even though he was a different alignment?

[Uprising]

I really don't think you both had the same kill flavour, to be honest, but if it makes you feel better to believe that, I suppose you can.


I don't think Parama'd make it the same for both alignments...

[Uprising]

The part where the person I protected died and was mafia? That's usually kind of suggestive of something.

How do we know there isn't a kill that essentially vetos a protect?
How do we know you're not just a quack?

[Uprising]

I'll post more after class.

[Uprising]

That makes a lot of sense, actually.
I like that explanation a bit more.

[Uprising]

People call me obvious scum as town as well. x.x
I'm sorry school is taking a lot of time. My partner did NOTHING on our assignment so I had to do it all just now. I'm very sorry.


I need to spend time rereading. I didn't expect Exe to be scum.

Because of how Enigma and Exe were acting, I'm feeling that was not a bus. LrdWhyt has still fallen off of the planet so I cannot possibly judge him at this moment. This is partly because the other two people who were him confused the hell out of me. CooLDoG is town imho.
Chesskid may be scum, but I'm not positive. I do not know his meta and he appears to be jumping about a fair bit.
Charnel is likely a scum but I cannot put it into words.

[Uprising]

Wait a second... Exe and Enigma could have been bussing each other hard...

[Uprising]

I see.

Enigma and Chess are most definitely not of the same alignment because of:

I will hammer, if Charnel revotes. Zang's disappearance is horrible.

People I will not be protecting tonight:
Enigma

AND

I wouldn't mind being rid of you tbh.

At least in my opinion. So this means one is scum and one is not.

Now that chesskid has informed me that that was coaching, I'm not so sure whether or not Enigma is town anymore.


Charnel, you've been tunnelling like a mad man. It's fun to watch.
Really, that's the only thing I've got on you and I'm aware it's awful and I'm aware it's not always a scumtell.

I don't like how LrdWhyt hasn't been here. I want to get a read on him soon.

[Uprising]

Maybe you both can be, but part of me feels you're not both town.

Wait, sorry, I'm stupid.

We for sure have one mafia left.
We also likely have a third party.
2/6.
One of you is likely one of those, however, I'm pretty sure you are not SK, nor is he.

Sorry for the comma splicing.

I'm going to reread CooLDoG's case on you before I find more for what I said above.

[Uprising]

Oh wait
He unvoted you.

[Uprising]

Just for laughs I'm going to try to kill Enigma tonight, because I don't like him.

That's kind of mean to say.


Also, if you think Exe was coaching Enigma, what does that make him?

[Uprising]

People call me obvious scum

as town as well.

x.x

I didn't at first notice what was wrong with this sentence, but now I found it. The bolded is a scumslip. She talks from the point where she knows she isn't town here.

Clearly, that's NOT what I meant.

[Uprising]

Trying to catch up, but now that Uprising has outright stated that her behaviour has not changed, I do think that she's likely lying, but that I might also be biased, and it would be nice if someone else would comment on her actual behaviour, as it seems that only a few people have.

I also think that I'm using meta reasons too much.

What do you mean, you're biased?

[Uprising]

I know I keep posting excuses.


I have no excuse for my behaviour. I'm aware I'm scummy as hell. Also, I'm not going to disagree with Charnel's case on me. Everything he says is true except the fact I'm scum. However, I cannot prove that.

As for now, I'm going to avoid a blatant OMGUS vote.

[Uprising]

my name is enigma lurk lurk lurk

To be honest, part of me forgot he was here.

[Uprising]

Omg, I just meant that he's right about my behaviour. x.x

[Uprising]

Also, I intend to vote now.

VOTE: Charnel

[Uprising]

Can we lynch Enigma tomorrow?

Lol. I'm not going to setup any lynch without seeing my result (if I track someone, I'm still not convinced on that), and today's flip. It's simply not clever not to take every information into consideration.

I don't disagree with Charnel's reasoning here. Absolutely. We need to see whatever else happens.

[Uprising]

Trying to catch up, but now that Uprising has outright stated that her behaviour has not changed, I do think that she's likely lying, but that I might also be biased, and it would be nice if someone else would comment on her actual behaviour, as it seems that only a few people have.

I also think that I'm using meta reasons too much.

What do you mean, you're biased?

Confirmation bias, I guess.

That now makes perfect sense.

[Uprising]

To me, he is the most likely scum, but I cannot word it out well. Either way, I'll be bitched out about the vote, I'm sure.

[Uprising]

@up, that is not an answer, answer the question.

THAT IS AN ANSWER.
I can't explain how he's scum, I just know he is.

(Besides his tunneling.)

[Uprising]

^^

That bothered/confused me a little.
You tunneled him and gave up it seems, and now are on to me.

[Uprising]

By me?

Oh, I know.

[Uprising]

CooLDoG

I SAID I DON'T HAVE A PROPER CASE. x.x
Stop pushing for that.



LRD NEEDS TO TALK MORe

[Uprising]

x.x


lrd may not be an awful lynch, tbh.

[Uprising]

Okay, that's going to be misconstrued.

He has be a lurkaholic and therefore unreadable.

I'm content with my vote, however.

[Uprising]

To be honest, I don't understand what he's asking you.

[Uprising]

Guys, I'm really sorry if I don't post for the next day. I spiralled off the road into a ditch during a freak snow storm. I'll post tomorrow or the next day. Trying to make sure I'm all fine.

[Uprising]

Mafia died.

2/6 chance we lynch scum.

Up to three kills tonight most likely, unless the vig doesn't shoot.

Scum can/may cross kill. I mean, unless, of course, there's a kill-immune scum in play (which would just be mean).

[Uprising]

CooLDoG, I think you should kill tonight.

You'll have a 1:2 chance of hitting correctly, unless we lynch correctly. This is only if there actually IS the third party we've spoken about.

It isn't impossible that only one scum is left.

[Uprising]

Oh... Okay. Well, I'm wrong then.

[Uprising]

Okay, I'm done.

VOTE: Lrdwhyt

Charnel, I'm sorry for even voting you in the first place now.


Voting him because I'm most certainly not voting myself.

[Uprising]

Exe, I'm sorry I killed you.

[Uprising]

Chesskid, I wanted to kill you so badly.

[Uprising]

How would you have won with Tasky?

[Uprising]

To be honest, I was thoroughly convinced Charnel was town.

[Uprising]

That makes sense.

GG everyone.

[Uprising]

I wanted it to be a prisoner's dilemma.