StrangerCoug's Worst Nightmare IIIS: The Dungeon (Game over)

BrookylnConstruction · Post Post #200 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:42 pm

Antihero wrote:
Blooderection wrote:
Antihero wrote:...still waiting on the reason for your vote that doesn't have to do with the VT claim, blooderection.
The wagon obviously escalated meaning that some if not several people saw her as scum. A VT claim is not a claim that should derail a would be valid lynch.
The fact that others do
not
want to lynch her based on that claim in my opinion is scummy
.
...and who are these "others"?

Whoever unvoted.

Parama · Post Post #201 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:43 pm

LLD's reaction = town
Blood's wagonhop = scum

Antihero · Post Post #202 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:47 pm

Blooderection wrote:
Antihero wrote:
Blooderection wrote:
Antihero wrote:...still waiting on the reason for your vote that doesn't have to do with the VT claim, blooderection.
The wagon obviously escalated meaning that some if not several people saw her as scum. A VT claim is not a claim that should derail a would be valid lynch.
The fact that others do
not
want to lynch her based on that claim in my opinion is scummy
.
...and who are these "others"?
Whoever unvoted.

I unvoted, and I don't think we should not lynch LLD because of the VT claim. I don't think we should lynch LLD because a few of her wagoners are really scummy, including you.

There's no one who doesn't want to lynch LLD because of the VT claim. Now you're just pulling stuff out of thin air.

VOTE: Blooderection

Baby Spice · Post Post #203 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:50 pm

Bhavit was just replaced in a newbie game for not picking up a prod.

Don't know what to think about LLD, but I really don't like the wagon. Don't think there's enough to go on yet.

Parama · Post Post #204 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:54 pm

Baby Spice wrote:Don't think there's enough to go on yet.

>9 pages
>Not enough to go on

???

yeah Baby Spice is also scum

Antihero · Post Post #205 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:55 pm

Parama wrote:
Baby Spice wrote:Don't think there's enough to go on yet.
>9 pages
+ a scum flip

>Not enough to go on

???

yeah Baby Spice is also scum

fixed

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #206 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:57 pm

Baby Spice wrote:
Bhavit was just replaced in a newbie game for not picking up a prod.

Don't know what to think about LLD, but I really don't like the wagon. Don't think there's enough to go on yet.

Sounds like a cop out to me.

Parama · Post Post #207 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:00 pm

Reconsidering a few things here...

Town:

The Stove
Antihero
Mafuyu
Twomz
Espeonage
chesskid3
Reckamonic

Null:

Me=Weird
Framm 18
LLD
Tasky
smargaret
Nobody Special

Scum:

sakshijain
Baby Spice
Blooderection

Nero Cain

Haven't posted:
bhavitgoyal
manho

BrookylnConstruction · Post Post #208 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:13 pm

Antihero wrote: I unvoted, and I don't think we should not lynch LLD because of the VT claim. I don't think we should lynch LLD because a few of her wagoners are really scummy, including you.

There's no one who doesn't want to lynch LLD because of the VT claim. Now you're just pulling stuff out of thin air.

VOTE: Blooderection

So why exactly did you unvote then? because of people jumping on the wagon? Specifically me?

Antihero · Post Post #209 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:16 pm

Blooderection wrote:
Antihero wrote: I unvoted, and I don't think we should not lynch LLD because of the VT claim. I don't think we should lynch LLD because a few of her wagoners are really scummy, including you.

There's no one who doesn't want to lynch LLD because of the VT claim. Now you're just pulling stuff out of thin air.

VOTE: Blooderection
So why exactly did you unvote then? because of people jumping on the wagon? Specifically me?

Yep. You, reckamonic, and Nobody special to be more precise.

Why did you think I unvoted? Because of the VT claim?

BrookylnConstruction · Post Post #210 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:17 pm

Antihero wrote: I unvoted, and I don't think we should not lynch LLD because of the VT claim. I don't think we should lynch LLD because a few of her wagoners are really scummy, including you.

There's no one who doesn't want to lynch LLD because of the VT claim. Now you're just pulling stuff out of thin air.

VOTE: Blooderection

Yo, i mean like... you jumped on and off that wagon like three times. could be perceived as non-committal scum. Just now you actually see that there could be a lynch. I dunno, I'm just saying.

BrookylnConstruction · Post Post #211 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:19 pm

I also don't even know why you got on the wagon.

Nero Cain · Post Post #212 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:24 pm

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mwen rayi ou, moun ki touye m '

Antihero · Post Post #213 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:25 pm

Blooderection wrote:Yo, i mean like... you jumped on and off that wagon like three times. could be perceived as non-committal scum. Just now you actually see that there could be a lynch. I dunno, I'm just saying.

lolwat? Yeah, I tend to not commit to wagons I realize are being ridden by scum.

And you do realize this post is hypocritical, right?

BE wrote:I also don't even know why you got on the wagon.

You haven't been reading the thread, then.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #214 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:26 pm

Nero Cain wrote:NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mwen rayi ou, moun ki touye m '

ITT Nero Cain hates us all.

BrookylnConstruction · Post Post #215 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:27 pm

Antihero wrote:
Blooderection wrote:Yo, i mean like... you jumped on and off that wagon like three times. could be perceived as non-committal scum. Just now you actually see that there could be a lynch. I dunno, I'm just saying.
lolwat? Yeah, I tend to not commit to wagons I realize are being ridden by scum.

And you do realize this post is hypocritical, right?

Lol, so three out of nine players is ridden by scum. nice

Antihero wrote:
BE wrote:I also don't even know why you got on the wagon.
You haven't been reading the thread, then.

yea, you said it was because she OMGUS'd someone. AMIRITE?!

BrookylnConstruction · Post Post #216 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:28 pm

Antihero wrote: And you do realize this post is hypocritical, right?

Howso? I'm voting because i don't like the claim.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #217 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:30 pm

Blooderection wrote:
Antihero wrote:
Blooderection wrote:Yo, i mean like... you jumped on and off that wagon like three times. could be perceived as non-committal scum. Just now you actually see that there could be a lynch. I dunno, I'm just saying.
lolwat? Yeah, I tend to not commit to wagons I realize are being ridden by scum.

And you do realize this post is hypocritical, right?
Lol, so three out of nine players is ridden by scum. nice

Did you read the massive post Antihero made? Outlining his take on all 10 people involved in my bandwagon?

More than 3 people he suspects. The three he named for you are just his main three, if I am interpreting correctly.

Baby Spice · Post Post #218 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:32 pm

Parama wrote:
Baby Spice wrote:Don't think there's enough to go on yet.
>9 pages
>Not enough to go on

Nice quote out of context there Parama. In your case though there's plenty to go on.

VOTE: Parama

Espeonage · Post Post #219 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:33 pm

Yeah K. LLD is town.

Parama · Post Post #220 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:34 pm

Baby Spice wrote:
Parama wrote:
Baby Spice wrote:Don't think there's enough to go on yet.
>9 pages
>Not enough to go on

Nice quote out of context there Parama. In your case though there's plenty to go on.

VOTE: Parama

Thanks for telling me all your evidence against me.

Also that's not out of context what are you talking about

Baby Spice · Post Post #221 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:35 pm

Bah, forgot to close a tag

StrangerCoug · Post Post #222 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:36 pm

VOTE COUNT

Blooderection (2): Parama, Antihero
Baby Spice (1): The Stove
chesskid3 (1): sakshijain
Espeonage (1): Tasky
Framm 18 (1): Lady Lambdadelta
Lady Lambdadelta (7): Mafuyu, Me=Weird, Twomz, Reckamonic, Nobody Special, chesskid3, Blooderection
Nobody Special (1): smargaret
smargaret (1): Espeonage
Not voting (5): bhavitgoyal, Framm 18, manho, Baby Spice

With

19

players alive, it takes

10

votes to lynch.

Baby Spice gets her first strike for post #190, which breaks her post restriction. #218 is just a broken tag, so I'll fix it.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #223 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:37 pm

Baby Spice wrote:
Parama wrote:
Baby Spice wrote:Don't think there's enough to go on yet.
>9 pages
>Not enough to go on

Nice quote out of context there Parama. In your case though there's plenty to go on.

VOTE: Parama

You're not helping your case at all with this. This is bordering on an OMGUS vote.

Antihero · Post Post #224 (ISO) » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:37 pm

Blooderection wrote:
Antihero wrote:
Blooderection wrote:Yo, i mean like... you jumped on and off that wagon like three times. could be perceived as non-committal scum. Just now you actually see that there could be a lynch. I dunno, I'm just saying.
lolwat? Yeah, I tend to not commit to wagons I realize are being ridden by scum.

And you do realize this post is hypocritical, right?
Lol, so three out of nine players is ridden by scum. nice

What's the point you're trying to make here?

BE wrote:
BE wrote:I also don't even know why you got on the wagon.
You haven't been reading the thread, then.

yea, you said it was because she OMGUS'd someone. AMIRITE?![/quote]
Um, no.

AH wrote:I don't see anything except for quasi-OMGUS self defense and active lurking. This is a good wagon.

This is what I said earlier. The "OMGUS" was referring to LLD attacking parama for his list.

BE wrote:Howso? I'm voting because i don't like the claim.

1) That's an aweful reason to vote.
2) It was hypocritical because you were accusing me of being noncommittal scum while making a post that sounded very noncommittal ("I dunno, I'm just saying")