Mafia 119: MURDER AT HOTEL DEATH(GAME OVER)

[Jack]

I don't suspect ckd...he's almost confirmed town

unvote, vote:a2rudeboy

[a2rudeboy]

I am still massively surprised we haven't lynched Jack yet.

And oh, look, Pom disappeared again

[a2rudeboy]

because clearly your fos:CD/vote other doesn't look scummy when the person you fos isn't scum.

Sarcasm?

I may have asked this before but I'll ask it again: If that post in question read exactly the same way, minus "fos:CD" Would you still be voting me?

[LimMePls]

I'm not voting you.

[LimMePls]

Post by post analysis of a2rude

RVS self-vote + admission to lurking.
RVS.
Votes scum. However, enters a wifom loop to get there, and admits its bandwagonning "bandwagongogogo".
This is actually not bad posting.
This is. First prod.
Then prod avoidance.
Actually, more good posting. I hated the HOS along with the vote, but CD has flipped town, so it wasn't distancing from a buddy.
Not much to say here, here or here. I will note that this would have been more scummyness if CD had flipped scum.
Back-tracking when pushed by vollkan.
@a2rude: What is your read of vollkan?
Why is this question just for Snake? Don't get me wrong, it's a good question, but why is it just to snake?
More good posting.
As I've already said, I didn't like this post.
Not sure what this post was about. I'd have to go back and look at context.
I've already stated my opinions on this.
Not a shock.
Pot, the kettle is calling.
Not sure I copy. I'm not voting you. I expressed suspicion over your "vote/HOS" post. I've since said I didn't like the way you came in and were like "is that the only thing you guys are voting me for". It reads like you knew CD was going to flip town, so if you can establish that this is the only reason people are voting you, then when CD flips town, their votes should go away.

I'm not sure what to make of this pbpa. According to my notes I was really down on a2rude, but this read has actually improved my opinion of him a little bit.

[Pomegranate]

I am still massively surprised we haven't lynched Jack yet.

And oh, look, Pom disappeared again

Since when have you suspected me this game? IIRC, the answer is never.

[LimMePls]

This game's activity is excruciating.

[PranaDevil]

I agree, however so far I'm wondering what the hell is going on, we have Jack making no attempt at actually playing the game, horrordude being useless, Pacman deciding that lynching scum is a second priority behind lynching someone when he dislikes their (exceptionally pro-town) playstyle, and thus far it's horrendously ridiculous. Throw in that Looker was being completely worthless and nonsensical yesterday, and it's like half the game don't even want to win.

At this stage, I want Jack or Pacman lynched, not only has Jack been acting worthless all game, but he and Esp were buddy buddy at the start of the game, and he's just being allowed to slide by being useless and scummy.

Pacman on the other hand has entered the game, and his first action is to push Vollkan for... well, nothing at all in actual fact, as his entire case is "I don't like his playstyle, policy lynch him". Absolute bullshit.

[SnakePlissken]

I'm just bemused by the whole thing right now. Jack is the oddest of a odd bunch. Nothing personal people, but what are we trying todo here? Root out scum or sit on our hands?

[Jack]

That doesn't sound like something Snake Plissken would say. "Nothing personal people" ???

[silverbullet999]

you know jack... this isn't how I last remembered you.

[SnakePlissken]

Jack you want me to get in character then and only respond in Plissken quotes? Thanks for adding yet something else that's really helpful to this game.

unvote. Vote Jack

[Pomegranate]

I dunno, Jack feels a lot like he usually does to me. I mean, it's undoubtedly a scummy playstyle IMO, but he plays town like that.

[Pomegranate]

But I think CKD is also town. Town vs. Town, I think it is.

[curiouskarmadog]

This game's activity is excruciating.

explain

[horrordude0215]

This is jack's play Every. Single. Game. Seriously look it up. I will not be apart of a policy lynch on someone scummy because scum is to lazy to put up a real case on someone.

V/LA until saturday

I'll catch up then

Noted

[silverbullet999]

Jack seemed moreee... serious when he was a serial killer in my one game... granted I replaced... and why he doesn't remember me :'(

[Jack]

Jack seemed moreee... serious when he was a serial killer in my one game...

waiting for you to put 2 and 2 together here...

Also of course I remember you

[vollkan]

This is actually not bad posting.

You're referring to this?

cooldog I claim scum, I'm scum with espeonage, your move

See. It's stuff like this and that exchange earlier that make me think that I would stand by a lynch on either of you guys, even if you turned up town. Because, at this point, if you aren't scum, you surely aren't pro-town (and it's not as if it's in your meta to play the VI) And that's enough of a reason for me.

If so, I don't agree.

Aside from the fact that it is Jack's playstyle (not that not being aware of that can be held against a2 at first instance), it's muddying the waters between a suspicion lynch and a policy lynch

I agree, however so far I'm wondering what the hell is going on, we have Jack making no attempt at actually playing the game, horrordude being useless, Pacman deciding that lynching scum is a second priority behind lynching someone when he dislikes their (exceptionally pro-town) playstyle, and thus far it's horrendously ridiculous. Throw in that Looker was being completely worthless and nonsensical yesterday, and it's like half the game don't even want to win.

At this stage, I want Jack or Pacman lynched, not only has Jack been acting worthless all game, but he and Esp were buddy buddy at the start of the game, and he's just being allowed to slide by being useless and scummy.

Pacman on the other hand has entered the game, and his first action is to push Vollkan for... well, nothing at all in actual fact, as his entire case is "I don't like his playstyle, policy lynch him". Absolute bullshit.

This is Jack's playstyle. Every game I have been in with him, he has played like this; and in every one of those games at least person inevitably does what you are doing and pushes what is essentially a playstyle lynch.

[curiouskarmadog]

so is what I am hearing is jack is just a poor player?

I found the FoS curious, when he backtracked, couldnt explain why, and lied...that is what made him scummy in my eyes....so he does all of that in other games?

[vollkan]

so is what I am hearing is jack is just a poor player?

I wouldn't say "poor" so much as chaotic/idiosyncratic.

[silverbullet999]

waiting for you to put 2 and 2 together here...

So.. jack not playing more serious = jack is SC... no wait... if jack is not playing more serious... =... jack is... not... Serial Killer!?
Am I right do i win!?

Also of course I remember you

Yay!

[Jack]

We've played together like 4 times ckd : (

[LimMePls]

This game's activity is excruciating.

explain

I make posts, come back 12+ hours later and there is like 1 new post. It's frustrating. Is that hard to understand?

[vollkan]

waiting for you to put 2 and 2 together here...

So.. jack not playing more serious = jack is SC... no wait... if jack is not playing more serious... =... jack is... not... Serial Killer!?
Am I right do i win!?

The fact that Jack has been serious once as SK does not logically suggest that non-serious Jack is not SK. All it indicates is that, if Jack was being serious, then it would not be a SK-tell.