Open 258 --- Night Watch --- Game Over

PogoStick · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:24 pm

Antihero wrote:
HopOnMyJoystick wrote:I watched shotty last night actually, I just felt like if he was town, he would be targeted by mafia
LOL

shotty, you're cool and I like you, and I'm not trying to be mean. But Joystick, you honestly think shotty (assuming he's town) would be the prime target for a N0 mafia kill?

joystick wrote:I only recognize 3 names in this games so basically it came down to picking one of the 3. I picked him cause we just won together as maf so his name was freshest. I didn't think mafia would target Andrew as he is typically an easy lynch in games.
Who was the third?

1. I am sort of new to the site so while I am aware of shotty's reputation, I have not seen it so I am unable to tell if he would or would not be a target by mafia night 0. I can tell you than on the site I play normally, I am often accused of being a VI (although I don't fake claim when I am townie) and I am often killed the first night, one game I was targetd by mafia group 1, mafia group 2, the SK, and the town vig all in the same night.

2. I have played with Andrew twice, shotty once, and nameloc once as for the rest of the people I never heard of you.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:18 pm

HopOnMyJoystick wrote:Wow, isn't that interesting you show up and put me at L-1

I still do not feel this wagon on me is a good one, the reasons are iffy at best.

Yeah I thought lynching Andrew today isn't the best idea but I never said I would not lynch him, nobody else shared my view point on it so I just moved on. I thought what shotty said made sense and put my vote back on him

I am a watcher

Die scum!!!!
I am the F'ing watcher!!!!

Antihero · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:21 pm

^There are 2, shotty.

*facepalm*

PogoStick · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:22 pm

drmyshottyizsik wrote:
HopOnMyJoystick wrote:Wow, isn't that interesting you show up and put me at L-1

I still do not feel this wagon on me is a good one, the reasons are iffy at best.

Yeah I thought lynching Andrew today isn't the best idea but I never said I would not lynch him, nobody else shared my view point on it so I just moved on. I thought what shotty said made sense and put my vote back on him

I am a watcher
Die scum!!!!
I am the F'ing watcher!!!!

first I don't believe you

second, there are 2 you moron

SETUP

3 Mafia Goons --- the enemy faction, gets to kill 1 person per night
2 Watchers --- Choose someone each night. I will tell them who visits that player
1 Hider --- Chooses someone to hide behind. If mafia try to kill the hider, unsuccessful. If mafia kill person who hider is behind, both target and hider die.
1 Role Cop --- Investigates someone. Will get a yes if the person is a Watcher or Hider, no if the person is vanilla town or a goon
5 Vanilla Townies --- they vote. and stuff. well, pretty much just vote.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:22 pm

Antihero wrote:^There are 2, shotty.

*facepalm*

you ruined my gambit!!
I'm not a watcher, I just wanted to see how he would react

PogoStick · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:48 pm

yet another gambit? like I said, gambits are run by scum not by town

nameloc1986 · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:14 pm

HopOnMyJoystick wrote:yet another gambit? like I said, gambits are run by scum not by town

Not necessarily true, but I do think shotty's gambits aren't that well thought out.

@shotty: What kind of reaction were you expecting to get from Joystick?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:36 pm

nameloc1986 wrote:
HopOnMyJoystick wrote:yet another gambit? like I said, gambits are run by scum not by town
Not necessarily true, but I do think shotty's gambits aren't that well thought out.

@shotty: What kind of reaction were you expecting to get from Joystick?

I was hoping for him to
A) Either say no bull shit I am!
or
B) Slip up and say, I was just kidding.

Also I still think that he is scum, because this is the only thing that scum would fake claim as correct?
Hop remember back to double cop?
We were scum buddies remember?
Ya we used the same tactic, and fake claimed the only double power role!
I still like my vote

andrew94 · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:47 pm

dude, i am a rolecop.
i investigated hoponymjoystick randomly
i got a 'non power role' aka vanilla (so he can be vanilla townie/vanilla goon)

he just claimed watcher.
he is not a power role
i am the rolecop
he is lying

vote hop

andrew94 · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:49 pm

nameloc1986 wrote:So if Andrew is VT and he just "fakeclaimed" RC, he just risked the counterclaim of the "real" RC. The fact that Andrew has faked claimed at least once before goes to show that he's capable of doing it again. "Stupid is as stupid does." We need to be really careful with this and how we handle it.

stop defending your scum buddy hop.
why would i randomly claim cop. i was trying to get hop to L 1 at the start (hence my pick on his minority post) so he coudl claim something
and bravo- he claims a power role, when he is NOT A power role. = scum

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:50 pm

shit andrew got our most powerful PR... SHIT!

andrew94 · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:52 pm

@jason
i prob fake claimed about 3/4 or more times as town.
i investigated hop because i felt like it

predit edit: dr, how is it the most powerful pr...
the only way i t hought to make use of it was to force a lynch on hop and force him to claim. if he claims pr then hes scum

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:54 pm

andrew94 wrote:@jason
i prob fake claimed about 3/4 or more times as town.
i investigated hop because i felt like it

predit edit: dr, how is it the most powerful pr...
the only way i t hought to make use of it was to force a lynch on hop and force him to claim. if he claims pr then hes scum

that's why it's powerful
Also just a point, Andrew usually(When I've seen him do it) only fake claims when L-1 or L-2

andrew94 · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:55 pm

HopOnMyJoystick wrote:yet another gambit? like I said, gambits are run by scum not by town

i know your not a pr. u say ur a watcher. if your a townie, you dont make the gambits i usually make. SO...

ur scum

MOAR VOTES LA

me genius at scumhunting

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:01 pm

andrew94 wrote:
HopOnMyJoystick wrote:yet another gambit? like I said, gambits are run by scum not by town
i know your not a pr. u say ur a watcher. if your a townie, you dont make the gambits i usually make. SO...

ur scum

MOAR VOTES LA
me genius at scumhunting

your lucky ass, got lucky. You are NOT good

andrew94 · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:03 pm

O WHAT , HOW DO U KNOW I JUST CAUGHT HOP THE SCUM

2nd scum right there...
im so awesome

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:05 pm

andrew94 wrote:O WHAT , HOW DO U KNOW I JUST CAUGHT HOP THE SCUM

2nd scum right there...
im so awesome

WOW!! REALLY!>!>!???
Because for once I believe you andrew and if you are telling the truth then by default he=scum

Antihero · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:11 pm

*sigh*
The fail quotient of this game is nearing 100%.

nameloc1986 · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:12 pm

andrew94 wrote:
nameloc1986 wrote:So if Andrew is VT and he just "fakeclaimed" RC, he just risked the counterclaim of the "real" RC. The fact that Andrew has faked claimed at least once before goes to show that he's capable of doing it again. "Stupid is as stupid does." We need to be really careful with this and how we handle it.
stop defending your scum buddy hop.
why would i randomly claim cop. i was trying to get hop to L 1 at the start (hence my pick on his minority post) so he coudl claim something
and bravo- he claims a power role, when he is NOT A power role. = scum

How am I defending Hop? I never said you did fakeclaim, that situation was completely hypothetical. I just made the point that you have fakeclaimed before, so you liable to do it again. Though your trap for Joystick makes sense. I don't like the fact you outed yourself so early, but at least we caught a liar. I think I'm willing to believe you though.

I'm gonna check how many votes he has before I vote back Joystick.

Antihero · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:16 pm

UNVOTE:

VOTE: CKD

andrew, I think I now know why some people are in favor of policy lynching.

Dry-fit · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:16 pm

The most telling thing post andrew's claim is that Hop didn't do anything in his posts to deny andrew's claim. He isn't even voting for andrew...

unvote.

I want to give everyone a chance to catch up and give their thoughts before we lynch.

Antihero wrote:Still not liking CKD.

Just because he's under the radar? Or is there more to it than that?

nameloc1986 · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:20 pm

If I vote Joystick that will put him at L-1. I'm not comfortable with that just yet. I just hope to GOD that Andrew is not shitting us.

@Antihero: You think Andrew was lying about being RC? If so, do you think he is scum or townie?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:22 pm

Antihero wrote:UNVOTE:

VOTE: CKD

andrew, I think I now know why some people are in favor of policy lynching.

anti and all
HE IS COMEFIRMED SCUM(HOP)

nameloc1986 · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:24 pm

drmyshottyizsik wrote:
Antihero wrote:UNVOTE:

VOTE: CKD

andrew, I think I now know why some people are in favor of policy lynching.
anti and all
HE IS COMEFIRMED SCUM(HOP)

Why aren't you taking into consideration that Andrew might be lying?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:28 pm

nameloc1986 wrote:
drmyshottyizsik wrote:
Antihero wrote:UNVOTE:

VOTE: CKD

andrew, I think I now know why some people are in favor of policy lynching.
anti and all
HE IS COMEFIRMED SCUM(HOP)
Why aren't you taking into consideration that Andrew might be lying?

Because although he is umb and fakes claims when pressured, he doesn't name claim out of no where.
And if we lynch Hop and he is town, then all that has to happed is we lynch andrew tommorow and it's worth it