Mafia 121 -- Picking Simplicity Game Over

[Antihero]

/confirm

[Antihero]

bark bark

VOTE: Haylen

[Antihero]

Vote: antihero

clearly someone isn't reading the game. I checked back and he's the only person who didn't comment in any way, shape, or form on the Jack situation so it's a good place to start.

I don't want him lynched but I think I need to see where this goes.

I had to make that random vote. In a previous game, Haylen gave me a post restriction where I could only post in barks. I needed revenge. And no, I didn't read the thread before I posted.

As for Jack, I'm with UK on that issue.

UNVOTE:

Glork: If you're town, do you think it was a good idea to go around telling everyone what a great idea it would be for scum to shoot Jack tonight?

Crap flinging much?

Post 57 = deflection fail

VOTE: Nikanor

What's up with this, Jack?
And why is LMP nitpicking at the most minor point in what makes Nik scummy?

[Antihero]

LOL! Quote tags.

Vote: antihero

clearly someone isn't reading the game. I checked back and he's the only person who didn't comment in any way, shape, or form on the Jack situation so it's a good place to start.

I don't want him lynched but I think I need to see where this goes.

I had to make that random vote. In a previous game, Haylen gave me a post restriction where I could only post in barks. I needed revenge. And no, I didn't read the thread before I posted.

As for Jack, I'm with UK on that issue.

UNVOTE:

Glork: If you're town, do you think it was a good idea to go around telling everyone what a great idea it would be for scum to shoot Jack tonight?

Crap flinging much?

Post 57 = deflection fail

VOTE: Nikanor

What's up with this, Jack?
And why is LMP nitpicking at the most minor point in what makes Nik scummy?[/quote]

[Antihero]

Xine is scummy (response to both the above posts)

*looks at thread title*
*doesn't see "20 Questions Mafia"*

[Antihero]

This is what we call an appeasement. You attacked him for his behavior, and he went out of his way to change his behavior based on your vote. And then there is blending with the "I'm with UK on that issue".

Appeasement?! It's a joke that only Haylen and I understand, I just explained it!

And yes, I do agree with UK on the Jack issue (you apparently "like it," whatever the f%$# that means). What now?

Parrot others-much?

Yes, I think it's weaksauce to say "OMG, look at Glork telling scum to kill power roles" like scum aren't thinking that already.

Why indeed! What is the purpose of this question? It looks like filler, and it is purposely vague, as well as more parroting (

others

were already "attacking" me for this). If he wants to come down on the LMP-scum side, he can. If he wants to come down on the LMP-town side, he can. This question is blending with town and not taking a stance. Which is hilarious, seeing as its the same position he is taking in regards to the Jack situation.

Who are these others?

[Antihero]

These two off the top of my head. I think there may have been others. Are you paying attention to the game?

Yeah, I don't see anything about nitpicking in either of those posts.

Please try again.

@Nik:

Glork calling you down on your BS logic of:

Not posting it doesn't mean that nobody else is thinking it. Don't even try this sort of non-logic with me.

elicited this response:

I wasn't thinking it and UK wasn't thinking it. If neither of us were thinking it, then nobody was!

I don't know if this is some kind of joke or what, but this doesn't address Glork's point. At all.

Who at the present time is the most scummy to you all? and Why?

Nik for the crappy attacks, and LMP for both nitpicking and crappy attacks.

Will you be happy with lynching Jack if both of those power roles are lynched/night killed?

I don't see how continued discussion about this right now is pro-town in any way.

Needless to say, I will certainly be reading himin iso during the night.

This is bizarre. Why are you waiting until then? Do you mean RL night or game night?

[Antihero]

Oh. Jack is right. Xine is scummy.

P edit: Damn you, ninja Jack!

[Antihero]

However, now that Empking admits that he has no knowledge of Jack's meta, myep that's a scum attack alright.

Epic non sequitur makes me lol

[Antihero]

5) Azazel and Antihero lurk like pros. Also, in case anyone forgot, look at their interactions earlier in the day. At least 1 of them is scum, possibly both.

So not voting on Emp because he posts a lot? I think you'll find posting a whole lot is actually a scum tell as they tend to overcompensate to try and make themselves look like town by being an active 'scum hunter' then there's the other end of the scale where the lurkers avoid posting to keep their neck out of the noose and be forgotten about.

This is a pretty flawed argument because it ignores the fact that not all VTs are apathetic. The burden of proof is on you to show us that Empking is acting.

Really? Well UK your dumber than I thought then. Why exactly is it another reason? You still are yet to provide anything of worth to back that up. However I do agree with Emp looking the scummiest. I go back to my previous over posting theorem.

1) The ad hom = not cool
2) Agree with whom?

Funny you should say that Jack, yes Glork.

Wow... how predictable.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: SnakePlissken

[Antihero]

fos:mothrax
fos(again):xine

I (think) I see what you see with xine (mere quoting + jump on bandwagon).

What do you find suspicious about mothrax?

[Antihero]

The hardcore AtE + the continued refusal to scumhunt = scumSnake; I like my vote.

It doesn't make CJ scum, it just makes him absent for the past week. Regardless of whether you blame him, the mod or the players (or a combination of the three) for letting him get this far his absence isn't a scumtell.

No, his absense isn't scummy, and no one said it was. The fact that all he did was pop in and say "I'm not getting anything from my reread except Vote: snake" is scummy because it is, in all likelihood, not true.

I agree with the general sentiment "how the hell did you get to page 12 without posting?" but I think all of these CJMiller votes are being made out of annoyance that the player has not made a single post up until now rather than because they think he is scum. Glork's reason is slightly different but is still just a variation on the theme.

I don't think this is true.

Do not misrep me. It's scummy. And in this case it was obvious.

FoS Mothrax In happy with my vote for now. Would go with a mothrax lynch if asked.

lolwat? We've gone 13 pages, not heard a peep from you about mothrax, and now all the sudden you would "go with" a mothrax lynch?
This reeks of OMGUS.

Preview Edit: I'm not seeing an ounce of misrep from Agar.

[Antihero]

Yeah, maybe OMGUS wasn't the best description for what I meant. My point was that it's weird that Haylen is good with a mothrax lynch from one post when there's 13 pages of content, and this comes after mothrax points out that what Haylen said is clearly not true.

From what I can gather hes:

A) accusing me of being scum because I wasn't on the Snake wagon
B) accusing me of being scum because I apparently fence sat on the snake wagon when i never even mentioned it in thread. Can't fence sit if you don't acknowledge something.
C) accusing me of being scum because I Voted CJ, which to me would suggest a chainsaw defence of CJ regardless of if he was attacking him earlier.

First off, nice job in isolating all those points off from each other. And C never really occured, AFAIK.

Antihero, I never OMGUS'd Mothrax because what I said about him was completely valid and I never voted for him anyway.

Vote, Finger of Suspicion, Toe of Suspicion, whatever. The semantics aren't important, here.

[Antihero]

So, Antihero, basically what you're saying is that I only commented on Mothrax's post because it was about me?

Couldn't have said it better myself.

[Antihero]

I'm looking at the votecount and I don't recall being the first on the Snake wagon (not that I have a problem with it, it's a good wagon, but that's kind of weird).

Jack, why the spastic vote switching? Neither Snake nor mothrax posted between your change of votes.

[Antihero]

I'm looking at the votecount and I don't recall being the first on the Snake wagon (not that I have a problem with it, it's a good wagon, but that's kind of weird).

*PING* We've got scum contact off the starboard bow!

Are you trying to distance yourself from this wagon before we've seen the flip?

Nope, just something I noticed in the vote count, Mr. Hay Factory.

[Antihero]

LMP's case = hilarious epicfail.

nacho, I eagerly await the UK case.

[Antihero]

Wow, I didn't realize I let myself go 6 days. Sorry everybody, and thanks RC for giving me a kick in the pants.

I see a few UK votes, which I don't understand. Reading nacho's case.

[Antihero]

LMP, you're still harking on about that stupid appeasement bullshit? For the last time, I was explaining an inside joke between me and Haylen to Azazel, who obviously didn't get the reference and voted me based on it.

LMP is so full of it, it's gushing out his ears.

VOTE: LynchMePls

Xine's points on Haylen and Agar fail pretty badly (not to mention they're kind of fencesittish), as does the soft attack on Jack.

nacho, I disagree with your assessment of UK's play, but I do think she needs to learn yoga or breathing exercises or something to calm down.

[Antihero]

And then LMP picks the worst reason to go after Antihero. These guys are firing blanks at each other. -_-

So, LMP crapattacks me, and I'm implicated because ...

scum only fling poop at their buddies?

If so, there's a larger scum team then 4.