Empking wrote:Yosarian2 wrote:Empking wrote:
LMP: I like the claim.
Me: LMP says he liked the claim.
Yos: No he didn't.
That's a pretty clear cut lie.
Are you scum, or are you just delibratly being obtuse?
Essentially we have two choices.
1. You forgot about LMP's post and you're scum protecting another player.
OR
2. You're scum protecting another player.
...dude, what kind of drugs are you on?
Essentially, we have one choices.
1. I forgot about that line in LMP's post, and wasn't thinking about it when I responded to you. Also, I still don't really think it's important, since the relevent post is the one where he explained himself, and you're still avoiding actually talking about the relevent stuff by pretending me forgetting one line is some kind of huge proof of conspiracy.
Nothing else makes sense. I don't even begin to understand how you can take that and assume I'm "protecting" someone.
as is you trying to sound like me "defending LMP" is somehow a strike against me.
The fact that you're defending scum while at the same time attacking (one of) his most vocal attacker is a strike against you.
If LMP flips scum, then yes, me defending him would be a rational argument against me.
What you're doing now, though, is just terrible. You made a bad argument against someone who looks mildly townish to me so far, I called you out on it, and now you're trying to say I'm "defending scum".
If you think LMP is scum, make a real case for it, try to get him lynched. If you get him lynched, and he flips scum, then you can try to look for connections. That's not what you're doing right now. What you're doing right now seems to be assuming that your horrible and illogical case is right for no apparent reason and then attacking anyone who disagrees with you by saying they're "defending scum". [/quote]
You're lying to defend LMP and your chainsawing to protect LMP. At least half your actions in this game have been indirect defense and spreading falsehoods to protect LMP. There's a connection and I'm not going to forget about that if it turns out that you were just buddying LMP.[/quote]
...again, what drugs are you on?
Actually, most of my posts this game have been directly or indirectly attacking you. I attacked your lame attack on LMP, I attacked your super scummy and lame attack on Jack, and I'm now attacking your lame OMGUS attacks on me. Because you're acting like scum.
Also, I like what you're doing here. If I defend someone and they're scum, I'm "chainsawing". If I defend someone and they're town, I'm "buddying". You don't actualyl care about facts, or about if what I'm saying makes sense, you just want to pretend that you think I'm scum so you can fake scumhunting, right? Just like you did with Jack and LMP.
Why is the cop investigating Jack when he could just come up with one more innocent and still reveal Jack as scum (by getting the doctor to claim).
You're right, the cop shouldn't investigate Jack, and the doc shouldn't claim to reveal Jack as scum. THIS IS WHY JACK'S PLAY MAKES NO SENSE AS SCUM. You're proving the EXACT point I was trying to make all along, at the same time you're calling me scum for making it.
Guys, can we please just lynch EmpKing now?
Boneheaded people especially when his scumbuddies are supporting his claim.
And it looks like you're pretty much just going to try to ignore everything I say by calling me, and anyone who disagrees with you, scum, and saying that they must be scum because they disagree with you, right? Yeah, that's a pretty standard scum tactic.
Seriously, I FoS a page ago and now I'm suddenly calling you scum because you disagree with me.[/quote]
"Suddenly?" You FOS'd me becasue I disagreed with you about LMP, right?
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie