Firstly, he's posted a fairly exhaustive analysis that I'm sure would comprise the bulk of any "case" on you. As an example, mod iso 48 is a vote count that puts you in a very negative light. He posted as much three days ago. Why does he have to repackage this into a "case"? Nothing is stopping you from commenting on his analysis now. He took all the work to write it in the first place; I don't see why he must also take the work of rephrasing it for your sake. And for that matter, how are things like this:Miyu wrote:Hito, please learn to read. A case does not equate to being asked questions.
I'll respond to everything once I get home. Though I do find it rather hysterical that you completely ignore me calling you out hito, but then turn around and try to bash me for not answering something. I ignored them for a reason, because I wanted ythill to post his case; rather than ask questions.
not a case?Ythill wrote:Miyu: There is no clear scumteam between the four unconfirmed players who are not Miyu. There are solid reasons why each one of them is not scum unless she is. Furthermore, there are links suggesting that she is scum with at least one of them. All four players posted while she was hovering at L-2 and being pressured by five townies. Two of them (Sand-ZF) were set up for suspicion against her; unless those two are a scumteam, the other had a hammer likely to follow an L-2 vote. While Sanx may have been scum stuck in a stance, the only other player who didn't suspect Miyu was Red, who had recently replaced in with a clean slate, and could have easily placed that L-2 vote with two likely hammers waiting. Tl;dr: Miyu is scum.
Secondly, I don't think Ythill really even needs to write a "case" today. Cases are when you're trying to get people to vote for your favorite lynch candidate. That's not needed here. Some time today, Ythill is going to call the scumteam he thinks is most probable from the sum of the evidence before us. Unless I severely disagree (and given that my analysis is part of the evidence, I highly doubt that) I'll vote with him. That person is the person who's getting lynched today. This isn't about "cases" anymore - it's about analysis. Maybe Ythill will cater to your obstinance, but he's certainly under no obligation to. If you refuse to engage the evidence or answer questions until Ythill repackages his work, there's nothing stopping us from lynching you while you remain silent. The burden of proof is on you to prove you're not scum.
Thirdly - and this applies to
everyone
- your job is not just to defend yourself, but to find the scum. Ythill's questions are both asking you for your thoughts on who the scum are. Why on earth does he have to write a case to get you to scumhunt?PREVIEW EDIT: Ythill came in and said basicially the same thing, but nicer. I guess I'm the bad cop here.
Also, Ythill:
Mallowgeno and DavidParker were both town. RC certainly isn't a clumsy player, but I can definitely see him getting complacent if he feels like the relevant mislynches are lined up. You can see from his posts on the tail end of day 5 that he's feeling a little burnt out in the game. This could be because he's a scum who feels like the win is in the bag.It fits with RC's misread/misrep that Wacka's exit was the only point against him. Red glazed over the double-bluff the same way he glazed over the other points against the slot. However, it seems really heavy-handed for treatment of an actual buddy. Does he seem that clumsy to you?
Actually, thinking about this now, I don't think RC could really be scum with anyone but Miyu. With Miyu-town, a DP lynch would have been easily achievable. They'd need only one townie DP vote besides Miyu to secure the lynch, and if either the n5 or n6 shot hit a lover that'd be game.
DP would be a knock-in-and-win mislynch if Miyu is town. Sure, killing him would help get Miyu lynched, but it'd be easier to get HIM lynched if Miyu is town.The paranoid side of me is saying that the DP kill makes the most sense as a framing mechanism for a Miyu-town lynch.
