Open 253: Sea Container C9++ [GAME OVER]

andrew94 · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:22 pm

no i was away the last 12 hours

jmj3000 · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:36 pm

Wait, so being away the last 12 hours, when the wagon had been building on for for way longer than that, stopped you from getting the mod to confirm you? Yeah, no, not buying it scum.

andrew94 · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:43 pm

i already got lynched. shut the fuck up

havingfitz · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:47 pm

An innocent child isn't what you claimed. I've never played in a game that had an innocent child but if the mod could have confirmed you and that is what you flip...big fail on your part (and perhaps a bit on the mod?). Similar to your Dr fakeclaim when you were town.

Maybe you shouldn't try to be so creative when you play.

andrew94 · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:49 pm

whats dr

you are an innocent child. at any time of day, you may type in bold (claim innocent child). i will mod confirm you as that role.

G thanks

Antihero · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:01 pm

Yeah, the mod had nothing to do with this. andrew didn't claim, so the mod couldn't confirm him.

havingfitz · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:17 pm

andrew94 wrote:whats dr

you are an innocent child. at any time of day, you may type in bold (claim innocent child). i will mod confirm you as that role.

G thanks

dr = doctor. You seem to like fakeclaims:

http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p2520921 - Claimed doctor when you were town

http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p2555883 - Claimed doctor when you were town

http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p2517832 - Claimed doctor when you were scum

Fakeclaiming as scum is one thing but fake claiming as town is idiotic. The trend with you getting lynched early in games should tell you something (about yourself...not the people lynching you). If you are an innocent child claiming mason was stupid as all that did was risk any real masons outing themselves.

@antihero...like I said...no experience playing in games with innocent child roles. Fine...any fault if andrew94 is

now

being honest falls on him (andrew94) and not the mod. Which BTW....

where is the flip?

andrew94 · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:19 pm

no i get lynched early in games because i talk too much like sa

talking to much = slips for some reason to ppl

sirdanilot · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:22 pm

Testing... kkkgggrrrr... testingk one two three.

andrew94 · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:23 pm

lol@ my epic twilight posts

sirdanilot · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:30 pm

Fair enough.

Votecount:
a2rudeboy (1): Alduskkel
andrew94 (6): mothrax, BlakAdder, Nexus, mongoose, havingfits, Antihero
mongoose (1): andrew94
Not Voting (2): jmj3000, a2rudeboy

As the day progressed, more and more captives became convinced of andrew's guilt. 'Pretty sure I heard him moving the other night!' 'I just don't like the look on his face! He must be man-eating scum!' Collectively, you decide to kill him and fairly divide his innards amongst all of the town.

Upon closer inspection, you reveal that he was carrying a complete set of human teeth in his pockets, as well as some heinous notes to his comrades with messages such as 'who shall we kill?' and 'i'm hungry for flesh, meet tonight at 4:00 AM'.

andrew94, Mafia Roleblocker, was lynched day 2

It is now night 2. Deadline is Thursday 28th of October at noon GMT+1. Please pm me any night actions if any.

sirdanilot · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:11 am

Day 3

Fearfully, everyone went to bed. Nobody was able to have a very quiet night's sleep, as noise during the night was constant: an annoying mosquito, one of your fellow victims snoring, and the constant startling whenever you hear a footstep. As the morning came, everyone gathered in the center of the container. "Seven, eight... nine."

It's now day three. With nine alive, it's 5 to lynch. Deadline is at Saturday 13th November, 8:00 PM GMT+1

havingfitz · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:59 am

Now there was some flavor and results worth waiting an additional 48+ hrs for.....

I was suspicious of Alduskel and Antihero yesterday
I think at least one of the three people off the scum lynch are most likely scum.
I think there is a good chance at least one scum hopped on the lynch for some bus cred.
All conjecture of course.

At the moment I favor the off the lynch option as 1-2:3 is better than 1-2:5 (fmpov) so VOTE: Alduskel

havingfitz · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:35 am

Bored/board inactivity bump.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

sirdanilot · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:02 am

Votecount
Alduskel (1): havingfitz
Not Voting (8): jmj3000, a2rudeboy, mothrax, BlakAdder, Nexus, mongoose, Antihero. Alduskkel

It's now day three. With nine alive, it's 5 to lynch. Deadline is at Saturday 13th November, 8:00 PM GMT+1

mothrax · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:35 am

Sorry, I am here. I need to reread but I would be fine with an ald lynch.

Nexus · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Sun Oct 31, 2010 5:28 am

mothrax · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:14 am

I've seen scummines in his play. The RVS overreaction etc. There should have been an "I Think" in my last post because I need to reread to make sure I don't have my facts mixed up.
Your turn: who do you suspect and why?

Antihero · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:33 am

After some review of the game, I've changed my opinion of a few people. Most notably havingfitz.

Scum: jmj, Alduskkel
Town: havingfitz, BA, Nexus

jmj: There was absolutely no reason to not believe andrew in the twilight of yesterday. I think you overdid your bussing, there.
Alduskkel: Reasons already stated in my catch-up post.

I'm /in for an Ald lynch today.

VOTE: Alduskkel

jmj3000 · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:04 am

Really? Absolutely no reason to not believe andrew when he is claiming a role that can be mod-confirmed, and claiming that he didn't have the mod confirm him because he wasn't there for 12 hours, when he could have had the mod confirm him any number of days before? Also, did you not notice that I did not vote at all yesterday? Either we have different definitions of bussing, or you are throwing any accusation at me to see what sticks.

Antihero · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:57 am

Oh, please, don't try to nitpick at semantics with me. You can bus and not vote.

And if you've played with andrew before, you know to expect anything from him.

jmj3000 · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:43 am

Actually, to the best of my knowledge, I have never played a game with him. I had absolutely no idea what to expect. Now if you will excuse me, I have to get ready to go work a haunted forest.

mongoose · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:46 pm

I dont like te looks of the Ald wagon. I just checked his iso and nothing jumps out to much. Iso #8/9 confuse me slightly. #15 seems a bit off, since he doesn't understand irony. Otherwise he looks fine. Why are you guys voting him again?

BlakAdder · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:22 am

My notes on Ald's iso.
#2: This one strikes me as odd. He calls out SA and jmj for behavior that would, under most circumstances, would be counted as scummy to some degree. But then he goes on to excuse this behavior for them. When I look at this, I see one of three things happening. 1) Buddying up and/or protecting scumbuddies. SA flipped town, so that dispels this one a bit, but he still could have been trying to give jmj some breathing room if they're scumbuddies. 2) Trying to start a wagon on one of them without officially being on said wagon. As I said before, it's phrased along the lines of "Here's something they did that can be seen as scummy. But

I

don't really think it's scummy." Scum scheming at worst, manipulative at best. 3) Null tell. This could be completely innocuous and I could be reading too much into it.
#3-9: All of these, except for 4, where responses to the clusterfuck that was Mothrax's massclaim suggestion. I'm not really sure what to take from this, but the fact that a quarter of his posts are devoted to this topic is pretty significant.
And... that's really the only posts that I can see something significant in. He seems pretty heavy on calling out lurkers, though I can't blame him given how slow this game's going. He only really commented on Andrew at one point, aside from generally gawking at his cluelessness.
That's all I've got for now.

havingfitz · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:41 am

mongoose wrote:I dont like te looks of the Ald wagon. I just checked his iso and nothing jumps out to much. Iso #8/9 confuse me slightly. #15 seems a bit off, since he doesn't understand irony. Otherwise he looks fine. Why are you guys voting him again?

I ISO'd Alduskel and I'm retracting my vote. I still think at least one of the remaining scum would have not bussed A94 which leaves a pool of Ald, a2rudeboy and jmj3000. I need to look over jmj and a2rudeboy more closely but I'm leaning towards one of them. I also still think Antihero/looker/katsuki are suspicious and is a good candidate to have bussed A94. Antihero didn't need a lot of convincing to get on the Ald wagon either...which supports both a town read on Ald and scum read on AH. I'd prefer to focus on jmj and a2rudeboy (who seems to have disappeared) at the moment.

UNVOTE: