Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[RayFrost]

I'm definitely

not

seeing a fishy wagon at the moment.

Unvote

for the moment... thinking.

[Equinox]

Antihero: I'm no longer in support of the Tasky wagon (though his playstyle makes me want to policy lynch him SO BAD).
NS: And now it's windy.

[Antihero]

Equinox: I hate policy lynches with a psychotic passion.

[AurorusVox]

Anti #236: I'm not voting him for PL reasons due to playstyle, so I wouldn't call my vote an easy parking spot (I assume this is what you're implying)

[AurorusVox]

Tasky #240: See above. Also, you would do it to --- not slip up, whilst appearing to contribute without giving people too much to read of you!

[AurorusVox]

Anti #252: If I may hold up a mirror; "what are you getting at?" In other words, what does Equi's desire to PL tell you about her alignment?

[Antihero]

AV 253: OK, your turn. YOU give me one good reason for the Tasky wagon.
AV 255: Meh, nothing.

[The Fonz]

Anti,How is attacking someone for not scumhunting (ie, scumhunting) hypocritical?

[The Fonz]

I don't have enough characters to go into depth, but look at say the way Korts presses ppl on anything that looks like it might be a lead vs Tasky's passivity.

[Herodotus]

I had a busy weekend and have more to do today, but I plan to catch up in <12 hrs.

[AurorusVox]

Anti: we obviously disagree about the validity of his Kunk wagon vote as a scumtell. It's only minor at this stage, but it's the best thing I got.

[Korts]

Fonz, tell me, how many semi-exp. VTs have you seen professing the same playstyle as Tasky? I'd rather have him interact than be the butt of a policy lynch.

[Korts]

The town's made the ultimatum requesting contribution from him. If he continues to be passive I'm happy to lynch him, but beforehand I want to see him do stuff.

[AurorusVox]

Tasky, do you have any scum games you can show us?

[crywolf20084]

I dont get this fishy lynch at this time. Im gonna have to re-read him. I also dont want to lynch tasky at this time. I still am demanding contribution however

[Fishythefish]

@AV 205: if he had a good explanation, say that you didn't find it scummy any more. If he didn't, push it. IGMEOH just does nothing, keeps you flexible.

[Fishythefish]

@AV 207: ok. I was mostly thinking of the “You could be onto something”, but I suppose the legitimate enquiry actually makes this fine. Retracted.

[Fishythefish]

@AV 208: it seems surprising you wouldn’t think that Tasky didn’t realise kunk was on V/LA. Seems a bad reason for a hop.

[Fishythefish]

@Korts 243: you seem to have become “increasingly sure” about me in a period when I didn’t post. Why?

[AurorusVox]

FtF 265: Scum can argue out of tight spot. Just b/c sth. sounds reasonable =/= true.

Wanted

2 leave option open 2 pursue later; accept expln, but still watching

[AurorusVox]

FtF 267: Lookin @town games, likely it was innocent mistake after all. Still thinks skimming is good, despite missing V/LA = bad. Waiting on linked scumgames.

[AurorusVox]

Unvote

since entirely possible he missed V/LA (if skimming as in linked town games, likely chance), and my theory could simply be paranoia.

[Antihero]

Fonz: Because you haven't been doing any yourself.

[Antihero]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: The Fonz

[Herodotus]

Equi and antihero: town/town as of page 2
minor fos: Korts's reaction

Auror scummy on pg 3. Active lurking
fos: Auror. Not a vote b/c I'm still catching up