Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[Herodotus]

I feel a little uncomfortable about this white-knighting. It's unclear to me what your reason for defending me is.

I'm in the AV-is-town camp.

[The Fonz]

True and I stand by it. Not a misrep at all.

[The Fonz]

Calling this scummy is laughable, dishonesty is always scummy, not mudslinging but obvious scumhunting.

[The Fonz]

To elaborate on the first point in last post: Anti is like this bizarro mafia player. Everything he calls scummy is protown, everything he calls townish is scum

Truncated. ~~NS

[Herodotus]

Votes mothrax at the height of the wagon, L-2

I believe it was L-3.

Did you notice my 3 unanswered questions to you? Please respond.

[Herodotus]

3rd: For me, no reason.

Reasons in this doublepost.

[The Fonz]

Did you miss the second half of that post where I say 'later explains it was distancing?'

[The Fonz]

Your questions in order: 1) She was active lurking before she announced the deadline, and pressuring lurkers to come back ASAP never hurts.

[Herodotus]

That was earlier, not later.

Seems like you gave up the opportunity to test her alignment for that, though.

[The Fonz]

2) I just answered this. You seem to be 'missing' an awful lot.

[Nobody Special]

Searching for two replacements.

Votecount coming later this afternoon.

[The Fonz]

I don't understand the second half of 658 at all.

[The Fonz]

Hero is doing something that scum do a lot here: nitpicking about precise timings of votes/number of votes on a wagon, whilst ignoring the real point of what is said.

[Herodotus]

@mod: do you want help finding replacements?

@fonz: If cry had tried to keep lurking, it would probably mean she was scum.

[Nobody Special]

Please, yes; if you know anyone that is interested, have them PM me.

[Herodotus]

What real point did I ignore? You said I was L-3. You said I gave no reason. False statements that you made,

[Herodotus]

apparently with the intent of implicating me.

Of course I'm going to "nitpick" (i.e. correct) them

.

[The Fonz]

Fine, except the A/lurking that she had already done already made me think she was the most likely scum at that point.

[The Fonz]

Firstly, it is CORRECT to say that you gave no reason in your voting post, and it's irrelevant anyway, since not giving reasons isn't scummy.

[The Fonz]

I then went looking for reasons (as I recalled you had said it was distancing) and found them. I found them later, so i thought you'd made them later. As for l-

Truncated. ~~NS

[The Fonz]

My sole mistake there was forgetting a mini needs 7 t/l, not six.

[Herodotus]

Fair enough. Now, about that game Tasky dismisses. Did you read it? If so, how did tasky's play differ in that game from here? Less lurky? More aggressive?

[The Fonz]

Not just the 1 he dismissed, the ones he linked show him to be willing to apply pressure on small things early on. In Mini love, his 3rd vote is a serious vote.

Truncated. ~~NS

[Herodotus]

Did he do that in the game he dismissed?

[Herodotus]

And again, what is the "real point" that I ignored? Wagoning mothrax? Do you think a 4-vote wagon is scummy? That there were reasons to think mothrax was town?