Succession Mafia (OVER!)

[ReaperCharlie]

Lynching recruits is a waste of valuable time

, and it also dangerously shifts the balance of power. If one cult gets repeatedly culled while the other goes unchecked, it will end up too numerous for the town & opposing cult to combat, and they will win outright even if they lose their recruiter. Obviously, we don't want this to happen.

Thank you Captain Obvious.

But if it'll help you sleep at night, I'll vote RC because I still think he is a legitimate lynch choice today.

Aim: ReaperCharlie

wait, after what you just said...LOL?

Gandalf is the greatest lynch.

Aim: Gandalf

Quick before Flay notices.

Yarrrr... this is absolutely incredible. keep throwing that sh*t around to see where it sticks.





I would actually be down for a Darox lynch if we can't push the ooba one through.

Though I believe we can, and I believe it is the best lynch.

[xvart]

It's pretty obvious that the large cult wants Ooba eliminated, but it's not enough for them to win, or they would have hammered already. That's good. I'm more inclined to lynch Gandalf since he's third in popularity and I don't think Quag is particularly a better lynch.

I actually would think the opposite: that the large cult doesn't want ooba dead and has the numbers to practically necessitate everyone that is not in their cult to coordinate against them. Anyone town and everyone not in ooba's cult that has not voted needs to put a vote on ooba now.

The fact of the matter is that ooba has evidence against him (whether or not you think that is good evidence is beside the point now). The other suggested people that might be recruiter are Erg0, Prozac, Gandalf, and for pretty much the same reason: lurking, flying under the radar, etc. So... with three options there, you want to take a chance that one of them is more likely the recruiter based on what? Where is the distinction? Why vote gandalf over Erg0 or Prozac and vice versa?

ooba has more evidence against him than the three that are all guilty of possibly being a recruiter based on similar playstyle.

xvart.

[Lord Gurgi]

So then why haven't they lynched Quag already, xvart? If you think the Ooba wagon is town driven, then you should believe I'm scum. Since this doesn't seem to have occured to you since you argue as if speaking to a townie....

[ReaperCharlie]

^ This relies on the supposition that all town will vote the same way and agree with each other.

[Lord Gurgi]

No it relies on the supposition that the scum do. Either the ooba wagon has a lot of scum on it, or very few.

[Lord Gurgi]

Oh yeah, and the increasing unpopularity of the gandalf wagon over time makes me suspicious that he isn't recruiting new people.

[Lord Gurgi]

Oh yeah, and the increasing unpopularity of the gandalf wagon over time makes me suspicious that he isn't recruiting new people.

Not to be confusing with people, I think Gandalf is scum

[Darox]

Lynching recruits is a waste of valuable time

, and it also dangerously shifts the balance of power. If one cult gets repeatedly culled while the other goes unchecked, it will end up too numerous for the town & opposing cult to combat, and they will win outright even if they lose their recruiter. Obviously, we don't want this to happen.

Thank you Captain Obvious.

But if it'll help you sleep at night, I'll vote RC because I still think he is a legitimate lynch choice today.

Aim: ReaperCharlie

wait, after what you just said...LOL?

Gandalf is the greatest lynch.

Aim: Gandalf

Quick before Flay notices.

Yarrrr... this is absolutely incredible. keep throwing that sh*t around to see where it sticks.





I would actually be down for a Darox lynch if we can't push the ooba one through.

Though I believe we can, and I believe it is the best lynch.

Yup, saying lynching recruits is a waste of time and then voting someone I think is a recruiter is a total contradiction.

Now that we have marginally enough time to not try for bullshit rushed lynch, can we lynch RC already?

It's pretty obvious that the large cult wants Ooba eliminated, but it's not enough for them to win, or they would have hammered already. That's good. I'm more inclined to lynch Gandalf since he's third in popularity and I don't think Quag is particularly a better lynch.

I actually would think the opposite: that the large cult doesn't want ooba dead and has the numbers to practically necessitate everyone that is not in their cult to coordinate against them. Anyone town and everyone not in ooba's cult that has not voted needs to put a vote on ooba now.

The fact of the matter is that ooba has evidence against him (whether or not you think that is good evidence is beside the point now). The other suggested people that might be recruiter are Erg0, Prozac, Gandalf, and for pretty much the same reason: lurking, flying under the radar, etc. So... with three options there, you want to take a chance that one of them is more likely the recruiter based on what? Where is the distinction? Why vote gandalf over Erg0 or Prozac and vice versa?

ooba has more evidence against him than the three that are all guilty of possibly being a recruiter based on similar playstyle.

xvart.

This is awful terrible awful and makes me suspect you are part of the cult. "It doesn't matter if you don't think there is a good case on Ooba, lynch him anyway because hey, everyone on Ooba is town because I said so."

Ooba has bugger all evidence against him that isn't outweighed by the evidence that he's a LC.

[ooba]

Ooba has bugger all evidence against him that isn't outweighed by the evidence that he's a LC.

---

LG jumped to gandalf over Quag so made me suspicious a bit but I guess if he was scum, he would have just hammer'd me .. Back to gandalf then ..

Holster. Aim: Gandalf

[ReaperCharlie]

Lynching recruits is a waste of valuable time

, and it also dangerously shifts the balance of power. If one cult gets repeatedly culled while the other goes unchecked, it will end up too numerous for the town & opposing cult to combat, and they will win outright even if they lose their recruiter. Obviously, we don't want this to happen.

Thank you Captain Obvious.

But if it'll help you sleep at night, I'll vote RC because I still think he is a legitimate lynch choice today.

Aim: ReaperCharlie

wait, after what you just said...LOL?

Gandalf is the greatest lynch.

Aim: Gandalf

Quick before Flay notices.

Yarrrr... this is absolutely incredible. keep throwing that sh*t around to see where it sticks.





I would actually be down for a Darox lynch if we can't push the ooba one through.

Though I believe we can, and I believe it is the best lynch.

Yup, saying lynching recruits is a waste of time and then voting someone I think is a recruiter is a total contradiction.

Now that we have marginally enough time to not try for bullshit rushed lynch, can we lynch RC already?

It's pretty obvious that the large cult wants Ooba eliminated, but it's not enough for them to win, or they would have hammered already. That's good. I'm more inclined to lynch Gandalf since he's third in popularity and I don't think Quag is particularly a better lynch.

I actually would think the opposite: that the large cult doesn't want ooba dead and has the numbers to practically necessitate everyone that is not in their cult to coordinate against them. Anyone town and everyone not in ooba's cult that has not voted needs to put a vote on ooba now.

The fact of the matter is that ooba has evidence against him (whether or not you think that is good evidence is beside the point now). The other suggested people that might be recruiter are Erg0, Prozac, Gandalf, and for pretty much the same reason: lurking, flying under the radar, etc. So... with three options there, you want to take a chance that one of them is more likely the recruiter based on what? Where is the distinction? Why vote gandalf over Erg0 or Prozac and vice versa?

ooba has more evidence against him than the three that are all guilty of possibly being a recruiter based on similar playstyle.

xvart.

This is awful terrible awful and makes me suspect you are part of the cult. "It doesn't matter if you don't think there is a good case on Ooba, lynch him anyway because hey, everyone on Ooba is town because I said so."

Ooba has bugger all evidence against him that isn't outweighed by the evidence that he's a LC.

Read this post.

Try not to facepalm.

It's impossible.

[gandalf5166]

Yeah, ooba-recruits found. Darox, LG, and possibly Yos. In fact, if Yos posts without hammering, I will assume they're in the same cult.

[Lord Gurgi]

Yeah, ooba-recruits found. Darox, LG, and possibly Yos. In fact, if Yos posts without hammering, I will assume they're in the same cult.

If I'm a recruit, then you believe that the entire Ooba wagon is composed of town and the smaller cult, and that almost everyone not on the wagon is scum.

The thing is of course that you can't come out of lurking to denounce us for joining your wagon without actually doing anything else. RC's defense before you even post only reassures me.

[Yosarian2]

Yeah, ooba-recruits found. Darox, LG, and possibly Yos. In fact, if Yos posts without hammering, I will assume they're in the same cult.

I've been saying for most of the game that Ooba doesn't make any sense as a cult recruiter, and he still doesn't. Almost any lynch is better then no-lynch, and ooba might be a recruit, so I might hammer him if it comes to deadline; but I'd much rather we lynch someone else here.

[ReaperCharlie]

Since you're browsing the forum Yos, what is your opinion on Darox?

[Porochaz]

It's pretty obvious that the large cult wants Ooba eliminated, but it's not enough for them to win, or they would have hammered already. That's good. I'm more inclined to lynch Gandalf since he's third in popularity and I don't think Quag is particularly a better lynch.

I actually would think the opposite: that the large cult doesn't want ooba dead and has the numbers to practically necessitate everyone that is not in their cult to coordinate against them. Anyone town and everyone not in ooba's cult that has not voted needs to put a vote on ooba now.

The fact of the matter is that ooba has evidence against him (whether or not you think that is good evidence is beside the point now). The other suggested people that might be recruiter are Erg0, Prozac, Gandalf, and for pretty much the same reason: lurking, flying under the radar, etc. So... with three options there, you want to take a chance that one of them is more likely the recruiter based on what? Where is the distinction? Why vote gandalf over Erg0 or Prozac and vice versa?

ooba has more evidence against him than the three that are all guilty of possibly being a recruiter based on similar playstyle.

xvart.

Why are you totally discounting evidence for him? I really dont understand this at all.

[ReaperCharlie]

*notes AGAIN the surprising number of people unwilling to hammer ooba*

*realizes that it's just because they just don't want to hammer their recruiter*

*chuckles quietly to himself and waits patiently for somebody to hammer*

...

[Flameaxe]

*realizes that RC's case is horrifically tinfoil-y and doesn't feel like lynching a claimed PR at this point over said tinfoil-y-ness.*

[Andrius]

*realizes that RC's case is horrifically tinfoil-y and doesn't feel like lynching a claimed PR at this point over said tinfoil-y-ness.*

OK, I AM CONFUSED.

OOBA IS JUST A LOOSE CANNON, YES?
IF NOT PLEASE TELL ME OTHERWISe.

[Flameaxe]

*realizes that RC's case is horrifically tinfoil-y and doesn't feel like lynching a claimed PR at this point over said tinfoil-y-ness.*

OK, I AM CONFUSED.

OOBA IS JUST A LOOSE CANNON, YES?
IF NOT PLEASE TELL ME OTHERWISe.

I AM CONFUSED AT YOUR CONFUSION.

I have no reason to believe ooba is a recruiter. I have said this. (perhaps I'll reword my original post to "..lynching a claimed pr at this point regarding said tinfoil-y-ness*"

[Andrius]

No, you called him a PR.
Assuming that he's STILL only a Loose Cannon, that means he's just a VT now.

[Flameaxe]

PR as in, has a different role than goon. Yeah, he's essentially a VT now, but he claimed a PR in my book at one point in time. Recruited, yes. Recruiter, probably not.

[Darox]

Hey guys, how about that RC lynch?

I don't know about all of you, but it sounds like an excellent idea to me.

[Chronopie]

No. Ooba is not a good lynch.

No. RC is not a good lynch.

Can we get an Erg0 lynch now that we have moar time plz kthx.

Holster, Aim: Erg0

[Lord Gurgi]

No. Ooba is not a good lynch.

No. RC is not a good lynch.

Can we get an Erg0 lynch now that we have moar time plz kthx.

Holster, Aim: Erg0

Good to know you're paying attention.

[Flameaxe]

No. Ooba is not a good lynch.

No. RC is not a good lynch.

Can we get an Erg0 lynch now that we have moar time plz kthx.

Holster, Aim: Erg0

Good to know you're paying attention.

^^^