Mini 1069 - Hospital Madness Mafia (Game Over!)

chesskid3 · Post Post #1025 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 1:59 pm

Also if my theory is correct, I am an insane doctor, 50% protect, 50% kill. Which makes more sense than any other explanation that has been offered, so I am going to operate under this assumption at night.

CooLDoG · Post Post #1026 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:11 pm

okay... Other then a lack of content I find chesskid a better target. Ups posts don't seem to give off a huge scum read as some people implied. I have another post comeing....

CooLDoG · Post Post #1027 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:26 pm

@chesskid, your theory, as you call it, is flawed at the core. No doc has ever said that they have protected wingless. I looked up all of enigmas posts and none indicate that s/he (sorry if your trans) protected wing. You said you didn't protect wing. You take credit for a scum kill that you haven't made and yet you fail to answer to the wingless kill. Did you or did you not protect in any shape, form, or fashion wingless? If you did not protect wingless and Enigma didn't protect wingless then we know that one of you is lying.

confirm vote: chesskid

I have a strong sk/scum vibe from chesskid atm. Looking at his posts he hasn't really posted much content at all and active lurked throughout most of the game. Sorry peeps but my votes on this guy.

@enigma, did you protect wingless? You never said that you did, is there any change in that?

Also, do I kill tonight? I'm gonna figure that out if I have time.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1028 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:33 pm

CooLDoG wrote:@chesskid, your theory, as you call it, is flawed at the core. No doc has ever said that they have protected wingless. I looked up all of enigmas posts and none indicate that s/he (sorry if your trans) protected wing. You said you didn't protect wing. You take credit for a scum kill that you haven't made and yet you fail to answer to the wingless kill. Did you or did you not protect in any shape, form, or fashion wingless? If you did not protect wingless and Enigma didn't protect wingless then we know that one of you is lying.

who'se your crack dealer? I'd like to get my hands on some too.

My theory: Doctor kill flavor is Euthanized. Exe killed Wingless, I killed Exe.

Your rebuttal of my theory: No doctor protected Wingless and he died. Therefore you aren't a doctor.
Logic is tech.

CooLDoG wrote:
confirm vote: chesskid
I have a strong sk/scum vibe from chesskid atm. Looking at his posts he hasn't really posted much content at all and active lurked throughout most of the game. Sorry peeps but my votes on this guy.

My 10 page ISO suggests I am active lurking? Really?

CooLDoG · Post Post #1029 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:40 pm

yes it does boy, I could run the percentage of one-liners that you make to posts... I just don't have the friggin time.

CooLDoG · Post Post #1030 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:41 pm

if we mis-lynch I can't kill. If we correctly lynch then I

can

kill.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1031 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:43 pm

CooLDoG wrote:yes it does boy, I could run the percentage of one-liners that you make to posts... I just don't have the friggin time.

Active lurking as defined by CooLDoG: 25% of the posts in a game.

CooLDoG wrote:if we mis-lynch I can't kill. If we correctly lynch then I
can
kill.

Uh no, it's MYLO, so if we misslynch you have to shoot. Clearly you should let people who actually understand how MYLO works and know how to play this game do the talking.

Charnel · Post Post #1032 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:14 pm

the reasoning why it must be 9-2-1 was simple. 8-3-1 would more then likely have a BP SK, and would already be lost by the town. 9-2-1 is winnable, so we have to take that chance.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1033 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:23 pm

Or you know it could be 9-3 derp?

Charnel · Post Post #1034 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:40 pm

that would need changing kill flavors, or a percentage role for you. Percentage roles barely exist on MS. Only newbies try to put them into their setups, and parama isn't a newby.

chesskid3 wrote:Charnel, are you mad?
We can't lynch the SK today, that's handing mafia a win unless our vig kills correctly. Really?

and you don't seem to be that convinced yourself. CooLDoG really has a point about you.

Charnel · Post Post #1035 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:42 pm

CooLDoG wrote:okay... Other then a lack of content I find chesskid a better target. Ups posts don't seem to give off a huge scum read as some people implied. I have another post comeing....

If you weren't that convinced of yourself, and you would get the SK role, what would you do?

chesskid3 · Post Post #1036 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:42 pm

It's a bastard mod >_< Sigh. So your theory is that mafia kill got blocked n1, there's an SK, and my protect did nothing because someone blocked me?
Meeeeeep. It's a long shot. We'll see, I guess.

Scum do not deserve a win in this game, you know that.

Charnel · Post Post #1037 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:47 pm

chesskid3 wrote:It's a bastard mod >_< Sigh. So your theory is that mafia kill got blocked n1, there's an SK, and my protect did nothing because someone blocked me?
Meeeeeep. It's a long shot. We'll see, I guess.

Scum do not deserve a win in this game, you know that.

You can't excuse everything with "bastard mod". nothing in this game has given any reason to think that Parama would introduce percentage roles. They aren't necessary from a modding point of view, and in general are bad modding because it gives the players a random element to cope with. In this case a random element that might very well be decisive in this game.

I really don't understand what information you have to makes you think it is a 50/50 kind of role.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1038 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:57 pm

The part where the person I protected died and was mafia? That's usually kind of suggestive of something.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1039 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:57 pm

What's your definition of bastard mod?

Charnel · Post Post #1040 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:01 pm

chesskid3 wrote:What's your definition of bastard mod?

Don't know actually. VT's don't imply percentages roles. It doesn't make sense.

Wait, CooLDoG, why are you voting for a semi confirmed player?

Charnel · Post Post #1041 (ISO) » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:01 pm

VOTE: uprising

obvscum.

Enigma · Post Post #1042 (ISO) » Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:43 am

CD: I didn't protect Wingless, I claimed who I protected when I quoted my role PM.

Chesskid is just herpaderpa and I think his more stupid than he is likely to be town.
However he does not impress me in the sense that he is much to worried about defending himself, than he is trying to identify scum.

I'm still happy to maintain my vote on Charnel after careful consideration.
Has anyone noticed his change of playstyle towards me?
Just yesterday he was trying to push forth a case on me, now that by some freak accident, his partner has died he is trying to connect with me (given I do have a tendency to attack on people who attack me, this is exactly what he is trying to avoid). I'm not satisfied with his night investigation choices, nor am I with his play from yesterday.

I would really like to actually see Uprising and Lrdy deliver some content about who they actually find suspicious instead of just fluff.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1043 (ISO) » Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:45 am

Just for laughs I'm going to try to kill Enigma tonight, because I don't like him.

Enigma · Post Post #1044 (ISO) » Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:09 am

EBWOP (I think, hopefully you get what I'm trying to say it's a bit confusing):
Chesskid is just herpaderpa and I think he's more stupid, than he is likely to be

scum

.

DW CK, I don't mind you not liking me. Quite humorous (and trivial) really.

Uprising · Post Post #1045 (ISO) » Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:51 am

chesskid3 wrote:The part where the person I protected died and was mafia? That's usually kind of suggestive of something.

How do we know there isn't a kill that essentially vetos a protect?
How do we know you're not just a quack?

Uprising · Post Post #1046 (ISO) » Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:52 am

I'll post more after class.

Charnel · Post Post #1047 (ISO) » Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:55 am

Enigma wrote:I'm still happy to maintain my vote on Charnel after careful consideration.
Has anyone noticed his change of playstyle towards me?
Just yesterday he was trying to push forth a case on me, now that by some freak accident, his partner has died he is trying to connect with me (given I do have a tendency to attack on people who attack me, this is exactly what he is trying to avoid). I'm not satisfied with his night investigation choices, nor am I with his play from yesterday.

Can you please stop tunneling on me?

Every single thing I do is scum in your eyes. I think Uprising is scum, you come to the conclusion that must have something to do with Exe dying. It's absurd.

Now, and I know this is out of your character, but could you try to go to a lynch? Either make a case on me and try to convince people, or move to somewhere else where you might get a lynch. Cause what you post till now (I don't like him attacking me yesterday!) isn't going to convince anyone.

Cause I won't have you voteparking again.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1048 (ISO) » Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:01 am

Could be a strongman SK, but idk, I don't see it.

mykonian · Post Post #1049 (ISO) » Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:09 am

One more possibility that I have seen in themed games:

a action manipulating SK. Now I think of it more, that must be it.

It is an SK that can't kill by himself. He targets someone else and the action of that person changes into a kill. Flavour wise this would fit as a SK who changed the injections the doctor used. Another marker for these types of games is the use of trackers and watchers to "catch the killer", who in this case would be an innocent town PR, who got targeted by the SK. It makes perfect sense, it is a bastard role, it is intelligent, it fits the roles we have seen, and it explains why chess his target died, and it fits the kill flavour and the theme. Such a role would explain everything.