Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[chamber]

VI and kast should be reversed* I found korts content amazingly scummy.

[Kast]

@Mod-

Thanks!
TF-Disagree, L-4 in response to a respectable L-5 is ideal for scum. At least equally if not more likely scum-vote

Sounds like you associate
1/2

[Kast]

"bad reasons" w/ "not S/Hing". Being irrational or wrong != scummy

RF-Scummy behavior = scum. Few posts showing explicit S/Hing is a poor measure of S/Hing
2/2

[Kast]

I've got responses for Fonz 1-6, but I'll refrain posting unless requested since I don't see it advancing the game much and it's long.

[Fishythefish]

@TF: thanks. Several examples of "Tasky is town", including 2/3 calling him such for antitown behaviour. I was wrong.

[RayFrost]

I don't understand what you are saying. Full sentences, please?

[RayFrost]

Oh, nevermind. I consider little s/hing to be scummy behavior, so I don't see any disconnect?

[Fishythefish]

@TF: I felt AV jumped on Tasky's wagon for a bad reason. I think that's a scumtell, regardless of how good the wagon is. What exactly do you mean by "opportunist" here?

[The Fonz]

Kast, I don't equate bad reasons with not s/hunting. At all. Protown noob is wrong, but sincere, and makes a lot of effort.

[The Fonz]

Tasky just seems to drop in once a day or so to say I'm scum because he doesn't like my reason for voting him.

[The Fonz]

Also, your posts are hard as all hell to parse.

[The Fonz]

His reason was pretty good for that stage of the game.

[Fishythefish]

I disagree. I don't think voting for a person on V/LA is a scumtell at all.

[The Fonz]

It's at best lazy and useless, which is a better thing to vote for than a random vote.

[Kast]

@RF-
Lulz. That

is

a full sentence. Clarify how you determine if someone has "little S/Hing".

[RayFrost]

Whoops, read the first part of your post without connecting it to the previous one. Little s/hing would be when few posts are promoting the reveal of scum.

[RayFrost]

Basically, active lurking. Little content and/or lots of repeat posts that don't add to discussion or information. Things along those lines indicate little s/hing.

[Kast]

TF-You initially claimed Tas had no S/Hing, but later admit he "bad reasons". That requires assuming "bad reasons" = "not S/Hing"
1/2

[Kast]

You blur the distinction btw playing poorly & playing scummy. This is similar to distinction btw lying & being incorrect. Lying=scummy. Being incorrect=null
2/2

[Kast]

RF- How does that compare to lurkers/inactives:
-in terms of affiliation?
-in terms of identification?

[RayFrost]

It doesn't. That's why all lurkers are scum, just that some aren't mafia.

[Herodotus]

@Ray: I answered in 388, 389, and 391.

@mod: Aurorus needs a prod

[Herodotus]

Don't give me a meta pass. :raeg:

If it's true, I'll use it. I don't care about your ego as much as I care about accurate reads.

[Herodotus]

@Vi: I wasn't trying to defend rayfrost; my read on him has cycled between scummy and null/leaningtown and I was giving examples of why.

[Kast]

RF-Is Tasky a/lurker or regular lurker? How does his lurking compare with AV or CW (both have many more obviously game irrelevant posts in terms of # and %)?