Actually, I hold the belief that your translation is wildly inaccurate.podium123456 wrote:Translation: "Post 63 pretty much junked my case."GhostWriter wrote:Fate, I've grown tired of going around and around with Podium. I know why my vote is there.
giving in? where did i give in? i said that his main point against me was ridiculous...Nachomamma8 wrote: I guess what I'm saying is why don't you hold your own against Fate right now? Like, instead of going "HERP DERP YOU SMOKE CRACK", tell him to jump in a lake or look elsewhere or something. Like, standing for your morals and beliefs and not giving in like a damned Frenchman?
That doesn't make any sense. The post is a rebuttal, and includes what you are asking for. Do you want me to rewrite it for you? This is the part in a debate where the other person rebuts it, if they disagree.Nachomamma8 wrote:Actually, I hold the belief that your translation is wildly inaccurate.Translation: "Post 63 pretty much junked my case."
If you wish to disprove my belief, then it would be wise to begin by explaining how your Post 63 explained away his case.
podium123456 wrote:Ok, just finished going through the thread. My thoughts:
@ Fate - He's pretty tunneled on me, as well as a little weird. His initial argument against me... (that i was actually scum, and was wanting to know what the bread crumb was for my benefit)... is just as dumb as me not realizing his initial comment was sarcastic. i mean, do you really think that as scum, i would genuinely be asking that? That would be pretty naive, and i would expect most people to assume that... just like most people might assume that fate was joking.
the difference is that when i realized fate was joking, i dropped it... but fate keeps trudging along with his theory, even though i explained what i was doing. i dont find him that scummy right now, though. and yes, what i said was similar to asking 'are you serious'.
now i will sit here and wait for him to yell and curse at me.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
@ Vibebox - i didnt see anything wrong with his vote.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
@ Implosion:So far this is the scummiest thing i have found so far. (which doesn't necessarily mean it's severe)implosion wrote:Excuses excuses excuses.Seacore wrote:Then again, I'm used to always being accused of scum early in Day 1, as some of you can attest to, so maybe I was just paranoid.
VOTE: Seacore
I dont see how you couldn't understand the context of this. He was explaining why he read nacho and fate's posts in a serious manner... because he is used to being accused of being scum early on D1.
How is that out of place/context?
Your rebuttal to seacore was:It doesn't amount to that at all. Not even close.It basically amounts to saying "hey guys, people always find me scummy so even if I'm scummy you shouldn't accuse me for it."
UNVOTE
VOTE: implosion
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On a related note, i want to ask seacore why you left off the argument where you did. what he said (that i just quoted) was a complete misrepresentation of what you said. Now... he might have taken something the wrong way, and not realized what you actually meant... but why didn't you correct him? Why would you back down from that argument when it is so easy (and evident) to show that he is mistaken/wrong?
Makes me wonder if that was a light distancing attempt, and seacore maybe tried to let it go as a light encounter, instead of getting into a bigger discussion over it.
And when i think about it that way, implosions inaccurate paraphrase looks like something a scum would say to another scum early in the game, as a light bus.
Wait. My heart didn't skip a beat in joy.GhostWriter wrote:Okay, this is down-right pathetic and/or scummy. Clearly, Fate is using this to make an RVS vote. Clearly. Very fucking clearly. Podium deserved the vote he got for allegedly not seeing that. Probably thought Fate would just point out that it was an RVS vote and leave it at that, though he apparently doesn't know Fate very well. "Sarcasm doesn't work well in text". Really? It's the RVS, the part of the game most likely to be filled with nothing but sarcasm and joking around. In fact, choo-choo. VOTE: Podium
25+ on this site.Zinive wrote:This is around my 9th game and I would like to know from everyone how many games he/she has already played already.
this is not a debate.podium123456 wrote:It's your turn. That's how a debate works.GhostWriter wrote:This. Do it.Nachomamma8 wrote:begin by explaining how your Post 63 explained away his case.
Here I dismiss the wagon on me as lazy and contentless, and outright refuse to answer a question.VibeBox wrote: You guys are cute.
In other news, I like to actively discourage laziness, so...no.
So, my post was shit because it was "all basically available in thread", yet you felt the need to ask a question I answeredVasudeVa wrote: VibeBox, opinions on the wagon on you.
This was anVibeBox wrote:Try not to shitpost.podium123456 wrote:wait... let me pull a fate
OMG guys, he just told us he's going to be lurking... and... SCUM LURK.Fate wrote: I have other games I replaced into that take precedent.
HOLY GOD!! Wagons! Big WAGONS! NAO!
derpaderpa derp.
edit: ninjad
u r a fail.podium123456 wrote:*facepalm*Fate wrote: HERAPDERPA IM GONNA MOCK FATE INSTEAD OF TRYING TO GET A READ ON HIS ALIGNMENT BECAUSE IM SCUM
If i'm scum then why do i need to try and get a read on your alignment, dumbass?
HOO BOY... we in for a good one here folks.
This is me providing my current reads, including two players as yet unmentioned (one of them being you, and you admit that I was right to say so because of your contentless post)VibeBox wrote:Ghost is AOKAIE by my.
Vas and Zinive are not.
VasudeVa wrote:VibeBox wrote: What,precisely, in my post you were referring to meets this criteria?
Why don't you tell us why these comments are...VasudeVa wrote:Yourwhole#65.
VasudeVa wrote:stale shit openly available in thread
If you couldn't understand what I was saying why did you assume it was a negative comment, thus making my remark about you and Zi positive ones?VasudeVa wrote: Soo, because I misunderstood your fancy-shmancy hip version of 'Okay', thinking that you were calling me and Zinive not fail when you had little reason to say so, I'm automatically calling for brownie points?
It was actually "Null-Fail" before, but I wanted to push a wagon to keep us from relapsing into RVSishness. Now, idk, but he is definitely still some kind of fail.VasudeVa wrote:Because podium is a 'fail', what's your read on him? Do you think he's Town-fail or scum-fail?
I don't know who you're referring to here, or why you are addressing it to me.podium123456 wrote:
@ Vibebox - i didnt see anything wrong with his vote.
For now, he is still ok, but losing points for not posting.Nachomamma8 wrote:Vibe, is Ghost still A OK with you?
Consequences Scum only suffer if they make the decision that it is positive EV for them to do so, but w/e, this isn't the place for the discussion. If you don't agree with my opinion, making a pointless post about it isn't going to do much good.MagnaofIllusion wrote:And both the options you mention here have consequences. If you don’t like the site meta calling it awful isn’t going to do much good.Vibebox wrote:Allowing an unclaimed player to reach L-1 seems awful. It allows for quicklynching and self-hammering.
Yes it does.MagnaofIllusion wrote:It has nothing to do with confusing me. Nice try Tex.Vibebox wrote:I'm sorry that a little intrawebs lingo is enough to confuse you.
Please point out a specific inconsistency in my opinion.MagnaofIllusion wrote: It has everything to do with consistency in your opinion and posting.
It would...if I had shitposted. You can answer the same rebuttal I gave Vas above if you want to continue to assert that I shitposted.MagnaofIllusion wrote: You call someone out for crap posting and then post what is basically crap yourself. That borders on Cognitive Dissonance.
Correction: It was clear he wasMagnaofIllusion wrote:It’s clear he failed to get the reference.Vibebox wrote:He completely failed to understand Fate's point. Are you really saying you couldn't tell that's what I was referencing?
You say "cute" (to make me look bad), I say "acting with some degree of subtlety".MagnaofIllusion wrote:If your statement doesn’t indicate he is scum for doing so why did you post it? If it does indicate he is scum why didn't you just call him scummy as opposed to being cute?
It is quite early in the game, and at this point "gut" is half of it. Given the low number of posts by each of them at that point, you really couldn't deduce the reasons I didn't like either of them? (oh gee, I didn't directly call you scummy, oh noooo000! Now answer.)MagnaofIllusion wrote:I looked at your ISO. Your only mention of Zini is to call him one of the ‘funny’ guys and you only interacted with VV at ISO 4. So unless you are going purely on ‘gut’ here some support would be great.Vibebox wrote:Vas & Zinive = not
THAT. IS YOUR ENTIRE REBUTTAL. JUST THAT.podium wrote: i mean, do you really think that as scum, i would genuinely be asking that?
Remind me again what your case is on anyone, because I trashed your implosion one and that's about the closest you've actually come to scumhunting.podium123456 wrote:Remind me again what your case is against me. Because so far all you have done is admitted that you are sheeping fate.Nachomamma8 wrote: Podium's wagon is excellent. I wish it would hurry to a lynch already.
I think your *being cute* card is just about used up.
cute as in laughy-jokey-i'm gonna be the cool funny guy, and no one will suspect a thing.Nachomamma8 wrote:Cute?
MY AVATAR IS FUCKING SMOKING. THAT'S NOT CUTE, THATS FUCKING DANGEROUS MAN.
This is the third time i have said post 63... why haven't you got it through your thick head that that is the rebuttal in question?Nachomamma8 wrote: And yeah. I'm all for lynching your ass. Cuz GW was all like "here's a case", and you were like "WIFOMWIFOMWIFOMWIFOM", and that's not a rebuttal at all. Try harder, brosky. Try harder. Oh, you still don't know what I'm talking about? Here:
THAT. IS YOUR ENTIRE REBUTTAL. JUST THAT.podium wrote: i mean, do you really think that as scum, i would genuinely be asking that?