Call me Vas, ;D A little less active than I used to be due to IRL. Hoping to be back up to speed soon-ish!
VV if you're not voting Podium or doing anything but dickin around on some side angle with someone that's posting more reads and thoughts than half the playerlist then...VasudeVa wrote:Well, Vibebox, now that you are actually explaining what you meant with your #65, it's not at all IIoA now isn't it? Your #65 alone is fillyed shitty unexplained statements on stuff happening in thread that I couldn't even understand what you meant by them. It may be partially my fault that I didn't understand it and saw it as shitposting, but it is also partially your fault that you didn't even bother to explain what you meant with some of those statements because you choose to be the that one guy with lame one liners that he thinks universally understandable.
Hehe, nobody has, because there isn't one.Fate wrote:I still have a wary eye on Seacore though, who I feel may be difficult to catch as scum (haven't seen his scumgame yet).
you are a f'ing spaz, and this doesn't even make sense.Fate wrote:So you tailor your responses to the cases against you and NOT to what your play and motivations were at the time?
I'll slog through your 'case' when I'm in a mood to read your posts(Date TBA) and get right back atcha.Fate wrote:VV if you're not voting Podium or doing anything but dickin around on some side angle with someone that's posting more reads and thoughts than half the playerlist then...VasudeVa wrote:Well, Vibebox, now that you are actually explaining what you meant with your #65, it's not at all IIoA now isn't it? Your #65 alone is fillyed shitty unexplained statements on stuff happening in thread that I couldn't even understand what you meant by them. It may be partially my fault that I didn't understand it and saw it as shitposting, but it is also partially your fault that you didn't even bother to explain what you meant with some of those statements because you choose to be the that one guy with lame one liners that he thinks universally understandable.
GOOD TO HAVE YA BACK VV.
Call me Vas, ;D A little less active than I used to be due to IRL. Hoping to be back up to speed soon-ish!
do you guys realize how much i am being freaking hit with right now? i get started on a response, and click the thread and see four or five more posts that i have to respond to. and with fate acting like an idiot and just talking to hear himself talk, it's a freaking challenge to stay on top of things. so please stop asking me to respond to things.Seacore wrote: While you're waiting for that, can you please respond to the inconsitencies that fate has pointed out.
This is a precise example of "debating the tells" that I'm talking about. Your defence is all about other people's arguments, not about your actions and alignment.
Its not about my case, its about having READS on OTHER people in the game besides this little sandbox fight with Vibe you're having.VasudeVa wrote:I'll slog through your 'case' when I'm in a mood to read your posts(Date TBA) and get right back atcha.Fate wrote:VV if you're not voting Podium or doing anything but dickin around on some side angle with someone that's posting more reads and thoughts than half the playerlist then...VasudeVa wrote:Well, Vibebox, now that you are actually explaining what you meant with your #65, it's not at all IIoA now isn't it? Your #65 alone is fillyed shitty unexplained statements on stuff happening in thread that I couldn't even understand what you meant by them. It may be partially my fault that I didn't understand it and saw it as shitposting, but it is also partially your fault that you didn't even bother to explain what you meant with some of those statements because you choose to be the that one guy with lame one liners that he thinks universally understandable.
GOOD TO HAVE YA BACK VV.
I think that's pretty disingenuous. My action was that i mistook fate's initial post as a serious comment, when it was a joke. I said that from the very beginning, and there's not much else that could be said about it.Seacore wrote: Your defence is all about other people's arguments, not about your actions and alignment.
The only example here that involves discussing whether or not something is a justifiable scum tell, is the third quote about me comparing what i did, to asking if it was a serious vote. And that doesn't even involve an accusation that was directed at me... that was me using an analogy, and asking if my analogy was a scumtell.Seacore wrote:Here are some examples:
podium123456 wrote:If i'm scum then why do i need to try and get a read on your alignment, dumbass?
podium123456 wrote: What exactly was i caught doing?
.......................
ORLY? Explain to me how my comment showed that i was concerned for seacore.To me, these are reading increasingly more as you engaging in a discussion as to why the 'scum tells' are justified, rather than why you aren't scum.podium123456 wrote:
But hold on... i just realized something... what ibasicallysaid was 'is this a serious post'... i just said asked it in a different way. You are acting like i made some big case about Fate and voted him or said he was scummy or something... all i basically did was ask if it was a serious post. When i found out it wasn't, i dropped it. You're telling me that is a scumtell?
Sheesh... i just solved everything you have against me right there.
Next dilemma.
You still have to respond, if only because of this sass.podium123456 wrote:ok that's like 2 hours ive wasted on this site just now. im taking a break, ill address the rest later tonight.
and i hope fate pisses all in his pink ruffly panties because i haven't answered him yet.
So the part where I direct your attention precisely to my points? This is the part where i was hoping you wouldn't notice?podium wrote:Almost as if you thought you could slip in quickly with a vague comment like that, and think i would be too overwhelmed with everything else to notice and/or defend against it.
You prefaced your vote (that you had just said you were going to think about over the weekend) with one of those vague comments. When i asked you for an example, you made another general comment. Only after i asked you a second time did you provide specifics.Seacore wrote:So the part where I direct your attention precisely to my points? This is the part where i was hoping you wouldn't notice?podium wrote:Almost as if you thought you could slip in quickly with a vague comment like that, and think i would be too overwhelmed with everything else to notice and/or defend against it.
Well, I was actually already going through your posts prior to you asking me the second time, but there's no way for me to prove that, so fair enough.podium123456 wrote:You prefaced your vote (that you had just said you were going to think about over the weekend) with one of those vague comments. When i asked you for an example, you made another general comment. Only after i asked you a second time did you provide specifics.Seacore wrote:So the part where I direct your attention precisely to my points? This is the part where i was hoping you wouldn't notice?podium wrote:Almost as if you thought you could slip in quickly with a vague comment like that, and think i would be too overwhelmed with everything else to notice and/or defend against it.
My very first time as scum, it's slightly marred since the setup was probably unbalanced against town (though perhaps over favoring the independent win condition). In any case, Day 1 ended with me and fellow scum semi-oldguy bussing our third scumbuddy who had basically managed to step in it right out of the gate. I suffered some early suspicion for ending the RVS too early and being town-leaderish (which also had other players calling me town for it, so take that with what grains of sodium you choose). The next few days had town hunting down the independent win condition, which worked out nicely for scum, and also had two vigs that ended up killing town both times. In the end town had mostly drawn battle lines between two separate possible pairings and there was only one scum amongst either pairing so that worked out pretty well. Mostly I ended up feeling guilty for being scum because I think I discovered I'm a town player at heart, probably more evidence is needed for that conclusion though. Still, a mostly fun game, some interesting discussion, meeting a couple new players I definitely want to play with again, and a win after a couple of losses makes this one an overall positive experience.
That's twice you've said that. Just because fate craps out of his mouth and says it's me being inconsistent, it doesn't mean it actually is. Where have i been inconsistent, since you seem so eager to hear me address it.Seacore wrote: This is with the exception of podium responding to his inconsistencies.
degenerated? where did i degenerate from? i'm not following you.Fate wrote: Clarification: my case on you isn't that you thought i was serious, its that you had a gut scumreaction to my post and asked what breadcrumbs. NOW you have degenerated into this bullshit reasoning: "because i knew that whatever 'breadcrumb' you thought you found was nothing more than a made up scummy move on him... "
Uh... yeah, because i did.* When have i said that i DIDN'T think you were serious?Fate wrote: ^^ This implies that you DID think I was serious, as in scumserious. AKA you thought it was scum move. Which is just you retroactively justifying why you asked me in such a weird way.
??Fate wrote: So your stories are:
1. I thought you were being scum Fate making up shit, so I wanted to know what kind of BS you would come up with as a breadcrumb.
2. I was asking you if you were serious in a roundabout way by asking what the supposed breadcrumb was.
SO WHICH, FUCKIN, IS IT?
