Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[Equinox]

Earlier thought process: AV was rolefishing in the PoE style by trying to get me to deny allegations. If I deny vig, he crosses off vig; if I deny cop, he cross

Truncated. ~~NS

[Equinox]

Damn charlimit. EBWOP: ...if I deny cop, he crosses off cop.

[The Fonz]

Re-reading Herod, still gives me horrible feeling. Not being proactive around deadline at all.

[Equinox]

Hmm. I was going to say I wanted to mull this over because of [redacted], but I've just talked myself into doing this in 1050:

[Equinox]

Unvote, Vote: AurorusVox

Will reevaluate(!) other reads later after a meeting.

[Equinox]

Tasky: Current thoughts of AV and TF; thoughts on everyone else? You've been tunneling all game, and it's annoying.

[Herodotus]

VOTE: kunkstar
Process of elimination, lack of helpfulness, switch on tasky, tasky wagon analysis*

@kunk: if you want to live, give us a better alternative

[Herodotus]

@AV: Your 1034 is backwards. Equi meant that only scum would assume she

wasn't

lying.

[Nobody Special]

Votecount being counted as we speak. Sorry for the delay.

[chamber]

@VI:

in 758 you briefly mentioned AV, this is the only person you've shown any interest in other than RF (and maybe AH?)
Who do else you currently find scummy?

[chamber]

@VI:

Is it typical for you to vote without providing reasoning immediately? Do you think RF is the worst coaster in this game?

[Nobody Special]

Votecount 1.09

kunkstar7 - 4 - Fishythefish, Antihero, AurorusVox, Herodotus
Tasky - 3 - The Fonz, kunkstar7, RayFrost
AurorusVox - 3 - Kast, chamber, Equinox
The Fonz - 1 - Tasky
RayFrost - 1 - Vi

Not voting: ...

With 12 alive, it requires 7 to Lynch

V/LA: ...

Deadline: November 22 -- about three days

Random notes:
--Four.

[The Fonz]

OK, here's the meta point re: Tasky. I find it hard to see how he'd make that MD post if he wasn't actually using his own alignment...

[The Fonz]

as the basis for his reasoning HERE. (Which is why, incidentally, he shouldn't have posted it- influences this game).

[Herodotus]

- and you're still voting him because _____

[The Fonz]

Also, in his scum games, he both looked a ton more town than he does here, and also, he didn't omgus. So either Tasky's got worse,

[The Fonz]

or he's deliberately playing badly, but that doesn't fit his scum meta at all.

unvote,

I need to rethink this.

[Herodotus]

though I'm convinced that tasky is capable of playing much better than one-line thoughts like he's been using here

[The Fonz]

I'm probably going to go with Kunk. Agree w/AV that if one has 'bad town' read of Tasky, don't see what could have happened in 2nd half to change mind.

[The Fonz]

Time to use the time-honored OMGUS buster: Tasky, ignoring any and all actions by or toward you, who's scummiest?

[Vi]

chamber: Bluntly, I can't get a sense for scum between one-liners and post sprees.
At this point it's probably better to just play from when I replaced in.

[Vi]

Not particularly typical for me to vote without saying why, but it's also not typical for me to be playing a game with this godawful charlimit.

Fonz post-VC ge

Truncated. ~~NS

[Vi]

Still don't understand kunkstar hate beyond what Eq said.

AV reread coming tonight hopefully. Any other requests should be made now.

[chamber]

@VI:

The many issues with this mechanic should have been obvious before you replaced in yet you did so anyway because _______?

[Vi]

Because Herodotus asked me to, I had been looking to replace into a game, and I support NS-as-mod.

Also didn't expect it to be this difficult. colonslash