Mini 1069 - Hospital Madness Mafia (Game Over!)

[Charnel]

ok so 3/4 of me is like NO WAY CAN UPRISING BE SCUM IT WOULD JUST BE TOO OBVIOUS

and then the other quarter of me is like I WILL NOT LOSE TO THE MOST OBVIOUS SCUM IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE

Too scummy fallacy, chess. Really. Uprising is capable of playing better, if you compare her to NS or Shotty for example. Just look at how reasonable she stays in the post I quoted.

[chesskid3]

SIGH

[Charnel]

SIGH

As I read CooLDoG, he isn't going to support your wagon. I'm not going to. Enigma (obv) isn't going to. Enigma won't be lynched.

So. You need a better case on Enigma, or, a new case on someone else, or you state why Uprising is town, or you say that you think Uprising is scum and you vote her.

That are basically all your options.

[chesskid3]

Can we lynch Enigma tomorrow?

[Charnel]

Can we lynch Enigma tomorrow?

Lol. I'm not going to setup any lynch without seeing my result (if I track someone, I'm still not convinced on that), and today's flip. It's simply not clever not to take every information into consideration.

[Lrdwhyt]

Trying to catch up, but now that Uprising has outright stated that her behaviour has not changed, I do think that she's likely lying, but that I might also be biased, and it would be nice if someone else would comment on her actual behaviour, as it seems that only a few people have.

I also think that I'm using meta reasons too much.

What do you mean, you're biased?

Confirmation bias, I guess.

[Parama]

Day 3 Vote Count #3 (again)

[2] Uprising

- Charnel, CooLDoG

[2] Charnel

- Enigma, Uprising

[0] chesskid3

-

[0] Enigma

-

[0] CooLDoG

-

[0] Lrdwhyt

-

Not Voting (2): chesskid3, Lrdwhyt

With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch. Deadline is at 8 AM CST on 11/27/10

[Uprising]

Can we lynch Enigma tomorrow?

Lol. I'm not going to setup any lynch without seeing my result (if I track someone, I'm still not convinced on that), and today's flip. It's simply not clever not to take every information into consideration.

I don't disagree with Charnel's reasoning here. Absolutely. We need to see whatever else happens.

[Uprising]

Trying to catch up, but now that Uprising has outright stated that her behaviour has not changed, I do think that she's likely lying, but that I might also be biased, and it would be nice if someone else would comment on her actual behaviour, as it seems that only a few people have.

I also think that I'm using meta reasons too much.

What do you mean, you're biased?

Confirmation bias, I guess.

That now makes perfect sense.

[CooLDoG]

UP, mind filling us in on the vote there?

[Uprising]

To me, he is the most likely scum, but I cannot word it out well. Either way, I'll be bitched out about the vote, I'm sure.

[Enigma]

I'm not convinced about Uprising, which is surprising seeing as I lead a witch hunt against her D1!

It's actually more that I still find Charnel scummy as, Lrd is now easily up there also in terms of who I'm willing to see lynched.
Charnel's play and backflip on D2 and his night target choices still scream to me as a scum with a fake claim.

I want to see Charnel lynched today.

[CooLDoG]

@up, that is not an answer, answer the question.
@enigma, so at what point will you re-consider your vote/lynch?

[Charnel]

he first has to read the whole thread. He hasn't caught up yet, seen his post. Give him a bit of time, Dog.

[CooLDoG]

Who hasn't caught up yet?

[Charnel]

I'm not convinced about Uprising, which is surprising seeing as I lead a witch hunt against her D1!

It's actually more that I still find Charnel scummy as, Lrd is now easily up there also in terms of who I'm willing to see lynched.
Charnel's play and backflip on D2 and his night target choices still scream to me as a scum with a fake claim.

I want to see Charnel lynched today.

Enigma. This above post is a summarry of his reads from half a week/ a week ago.

[Uprising]

@up, that is not an answer, answer the question.

THAT IS AN ANSWER.
I can't explain how he's scum, I just know he is.

(Besides his tunneling.)

[Charnel]

the problem is, I'm not. While you have implied that you aren't town. It really isn't so surprising that you tactically voted me (as the post before your vote showed that you didn't have OMGUS feelings, but were quite understanding), and I even don't blame you for not trying to make a case. It really isn't worth the trouble, or is it?

[CooLDoG]

So the reason behind your vote is that he's scummy, okay. That might be valid, but I'm asking why he's scummy.

[Enigma]

Charnel please inform why you backflipped from you being convinced I am scum to not even mentioning me as scummy for most of the posts today.

[Uprising]

^^

That bothered/confused me a little.
You tunneled him and gave up it seems, and now are on to me.

[chesskid3]

SO
MUCH
BUDDYNG

[Uprising]

By me?

Oh, I know.

[Charnel]

Charnel please inform why you backflipped from you being convinced I am scum to not even mentioning me as scummy for most of the posts today.

Well, the arguments on you stand. However, both Lrd's and Uprisings play are clearly worse. After massclaim, I decided I would think you are town, that Uprising is the most scummy, and that if Lrd didn't get here, he would be in trouble either tonight, or tomorrow. Because, the point on your play, is only a single one. You don't join bandwagons, and possibly (though I still think this is weird), you are quite new to the game and they told you too often that bandwagonning is bad. The simplest explanation is that you are scum, but that doesn't really make sense in-game, so chances are that explanation is actually the truth.

If you had to do the same for Uprising, you need too many excuses for the scummy things in her play. So many, that the simplest explanation by far is that she is scum.

[CooLDoG]

@up, post your case on charnel...