Fate, I'mma let you finish, but Smarg has had one of the most misinterpreted events of all time. OF ALL TIME.
Let me help you get from A to B here, since I'm fairly confident in both of my reads on you two.
Smarg calls Tasky scum.
You enforce the idea of running up wagons on Tasky, Chrono, Parama until they claim, and if you can't validate the claims, you want them lynched.
Smarg calls rolefishing on the basis that you want to run up wagons until you find something your satisfied with.
You blow up because she calls you for rolefishing on Tasky.
You see what you're missing here?
Honestly, you can't tell me you honestly believe 100% that there is no rolefishing involved in offering to run up 3 wagons to claim in order to get what you want.
Rolefishing ain't completely negative, dog. I agree that we should get claims of people, force them into a stance that they might be uncomfortable taking but then forcing them to stay the course or be lynched if they deviate.
Antihero wrote:Stove, I don't think parama has a problem committing to reads.
His lists without any apparent reasoning give him free reign to change things whenever it is convenient to his cause without really furnishing any reason why. When he does provide any kind of reasoning, it is extremely weak and on the spot for being called out, like when you were told you were moved because of "tone" and "baseless accusations," neither of which he was actually able to provide a concrete example of. When pressed on the issue he skirted it and moved on to doing nothing else. He has frequented this behavior. It gives him an escape should he be on a town wagon and people begin to analyze it later on, and should he be lynched (like should happen today), he leaves little to no connections with any of his scumbuddies.
Woah, now we're calling Fate a brain tumor? Do explain, good sir.
Tremble in fear. AGar and Zito are near.
