1. You didn't address the rest of it.Knight of Cydonia wrote:Confirmation bias of smarg's read confirmed. bhavy-whatsit never even posted. That's not lurking, that's "not picking up role PM, not posting ANYTHING, not picking up prod".
The fact it's the first poitn of smarg's case worries me. Will address the rest after I go to lectures today. should be about 3PM GMT.
2. It was the first point in my case because I went through the ISOs of each player who had that role PM and grouped my thoughts individually. This sort of ties into what Fate is arguing about the best way to replace in is - I would argue that it's not to write a stream of consciousness, but rather to take notes and write a coherent post - just like I did with Fate's case. The notes can be stream of consciousness, and you maintain that fresh look at early-game interactions, but the post itself is (hopefully) organized and easy to read, and you don't waste time dealing with things like "Gee, I find BS scummy as heck" and find out three pages later she's dead and town. Also, the only other time I've seen the stream of consciousness thing, it was scum doing it.\
EBWOP: If it was scum with the delayed kill, why would there be no town/3rd party death nights 1 and 2?
EBWOPagain: Okay, so that's why no death night 2. But what about night 1? This game came with a night 0, so Tasky could have submitted an action then - unless you think BS was the scum target? I just don't see scum guessing the lynch twice. I also don't really see scum choosing to target a very scummy-looking player (BE was the second leading wagon at the end of day 1) for a delayed night kill.
